Striking back against anti-Semitism: New laws, new leadership, and a lasting legacy

 Police Chief Anthony Sizemore on April 24, announcing the arrest of Maron Raymon, who allegedly attacked Cape Coral’s Chabad Jewish center. (Image: NBC2 News)

June 6, 2023 by David Silverberg

While anti-Semitism continues to be a problem in Florida and elsewhere, the president, governor, legislators and police are pushing back against hate-driven actions on the ground.

The day after the shooter of 11 Jewish worshippers in Pittsburgh, Pa., went on trial, the US House of Representatives unanimously passed a bill condemning anti-Semitism. President Joe Biden’s administration has issued a new national strategy to combat anti-Semitism and the state of Florida has a new law against hate propaganda.

There is a tendency, especially among those who are the targets of ideological hatred, to concentrate on threats and dangers while overlooking countermeasures and successes. When it comes to anti-Semitism the stakes are particularly high and the reaction particularly acute, given that anti-Semitism demonstrably leads to murderous violence and only 80 years ago it gave rise to state-sponsored genocide by Nazi Germany.

But a clear-eyed, objective, evaluation of the overall situation is necessary for a rational—and effective—response.

So what is the state of anti-Semitism today nationally, in Florida and in its Southwest corner? And what is being done about it?

The national response

On May 25, President Joe Biden’s administration issued the US National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism. The strategy “represents the most ambitious and comprehensive U.S. government-led effort to fight antisemitism in American history,” according to its introduction.

“The Strategy outlines a whole-of-society effort to combat antisemitism, including unprecedented, coordinated, and bold actions that will be implemented across government agencies, as well as calls to action for public officials, private sector leaders, and Americans from every sector, industry, and walk of life,” it states.

Fundamentally, the Strategy rests on four pillars:

  • Pillar 1: Increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America, and broaden appreciation of Jewish American heritage;
  • Pillar 2: Improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
  • Pillar 3: Reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination, and;
  • Pillar 4: Build cross-community solidarity and collective action to counter hate.

As part of its overall approach, the Strategy orders over 100 specific actions, including protecting places of worship, launching an education campaign, and conducting annual threat assessments by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Counterterrorism Center.

In addition to that executive action, on May 31, the US House of Representatives passed House Resolution 382. The bill celebrates Jewish American Heritage Month but also “calls on elected officials, faith leaders, and civil society leaders to condemn and combat antisemitism.”

Introduced on May 9 by Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-25-Fla.), who represents a district covering Miami, the bill passed by 429-0 in an otherwise fractious and contentious House.

Florida’s new law and a new leader

Flanked by state Reps. Randy Fine and Mike Caruso, who sponsored the legislation, Gov. Ron DeSantis signs House Bill 269 on May 1 during a visit to Jerusalem. (Photo: Rep. Randy Fine).

On Jan. 19 of this year, before the start of the legislative session, state Reps. Mike Caruso (R-89-Palm Beach County) and Randy Fine (R-33-Brevard County) introduced House Bill (HB) 269, aimed against the kind of leafletting that had become a feature of anti-Semitic activity in Florida.

The bill made it a first degree misdemeanor “to intentionally dump litter onto private property for the purpose of intimidating or threatening the owner, resident, or invitee of such property. However, if such litter contains a credible threat, the violation is a third degree felony.”

It also:

  • Prohibits willfully and maliciously harassing, threatening, or intimidating another person based on the person’s wearing or displaying of any religious or ethnic clothing or insignia;
  • Creates a new prohibition against displaying or projecting, using any medium, an image onto a building, structure, or other property without the written consent of the owner of the building, structure, or property;
  • Creates a new trespass offense if any person who is not authorized, licensed, or invited willfully enters the campus of a state college or university to theaten or intimidate another person, and is warned by the institution to depart and refuses to do so; and
  • Prohibits willfully and maliciously interrupting or disturbing any assembly of people meeting to acknowledge the death of an individual [i.e., tributes, memorials or funerals].

The bill made its way through the Florida House and Senate, receiving final passage on April 26 in a unanimous vote of the Florida Senate—and providing Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) the opportunity to sign it on May 1 with a flourish during a trip to Israel. (More on this below.)

On May 16 there was a particularly significant election for Florida when Democrat Donna Deegan was elected mayor of Jacksonville.

Beginning in October 2022, Jacksonville began gaining a reputation as a center of anti-Semitism due to the actions of a small number of activists, calling themselves National Socialist Florida. They hung banners and projected anti-Semitic slogans and symbols on prominent buildings. During celebrations associated with a Georgia vs. Florida football game, the message “Kanye was right about the Jews” was projected across the stadium and banners stating “End Jewish Supremacy in America” and “Honk if you know it’s the Jews,” were hung from an overpass. (An excellent inside look at the Jacksonville group is in the NPR article, “In Florida, far-right groups look to seize the moment.”)

The anti-Semitic messaging was denounced by Jacksonville’s outgoing mayor, Lenny Curry, and numerous other prominent residents, including Shad Khan, owner of the Jaguars football team.

In November, Deegan made a point of condemning the overt anti-Semitism in Jacksonville. She won her primary in March and went on to final victory. While hardly her only issue, the election put a solid opponent of hate in office and expressed residents’ rejection of the anti-Semites’ message.

At street level in Southwest Florida

In Lee County, police were active in investigating and pursuing a case of overt anti-Semitism in Cape Coral.

On March 11 a man threw bricks at the glass entrance doors at the Chabad Jewish Center of Cape Coral while worshippers were inside. The vandal also toppled an image of a menorah and smashed a car window when he couldn’t damage the center’s doors. On April 20, Cape Coral police arrested Maron Mark Raymon, 51, for allegedly committing the crime. Raymon had a record of numerous prior arrests and legal proceedings.

Maron Raymon (CCPD)

“I’m very pleased with the attitude of our department and our community, that we came together, that we realized that this was a horrific act and shook confidence in the core of our community, that this isn’t something that happens in Cape Coral but we can’t say this anymore,” said Cape Coral Police Chief Anthony Sizemore at an April 24 news conference announcing the arrest.

“I think it sends a message that if you do something, you’ll get caught,” observed Rabbi Yossi Labkowski in an interview on NBC2 News. “It might take a little long, it might take a little time but you’ll get caught.”

Raymon was held in custody and arraigned on May 22 and pleaded not guilty. There is no indication that he has bonded out of custody. A hearing is scheduled for 9:00 am on July 5 in courtroom 8-B before Judge Robert Branning in the Lee County Judicial Center, 1700 Monroe Street, Fort Myers, Fla.

To the south, in Collier County, things have taken a different turn.

Last October, the county issued a proclamation that “condemns any call to violence or use of violence for any purpose at any time; and resolves to actively and vigorously oppose, investigate, and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law any advocacy of violence, acts of violence, or crimes manifesting hatred against any person, property, or institution based on faith, race, gender, creed, sexual orientation, or national origin.”

That statement of principles is now being put to the test.

One incident occurred on May 3 at a meeting of the Collier County School Board when the Board met to vote on a new superintendent of schools. The climate was highly charged and emotional between supporters of an experienced candidate already serving as interim superintendent, Leslie Ricciardelli, and a more fundamentalist candidate, Charles Van Zandt, who among other statements, called for reaching out to “unchurched students” and teaching Christian values.  

There were five hours of public comments at the meeting and Rabbi Adam Miller, head of Temple Shalom in Naples, spoke about concerns that Jewish and non-Christian students might be isolated if the schools became overtly religious.

The atmosphere “was unlike anything that I had experienced up to that point in a public forum like that,” Miller recounted in an interview with WGCU Public Radio. “A number of the speakers who were there, particularly many of those who were speaking in favor of the district engaging with Mr. Van Zandt, spoke in language that was extremely hateful in nature.”

He continued: “They talked about teachers as being indoctrination agents on behalf of some agenda that they don’t agree with. They spoke hatefully of those who were not identified as Christian. One speaker got up and talked about Satan being among us. So that became something that ramped up more and more inside the meeting, that sense of hatred or fear of the ‘other,’ of those who might be different than ourselves.”

Ultimately, in a surprise move, the Board voted 3 to 2 to appoint Ricciardelli superintendent, a decision that infuriated Van Zandt’s supporters and religious fundamentalists.

After the meeting Miller had one conversation that he described as “respectful,” with a member of the opposing camp. But when in the parking lot, “as I was walking towards my vehicle, a couple of men who had been talking in a group left their group and started to shout at me as I walked across the parking lot. They were shouting louder and louder and walking toward me in a way that was very aggressive, shouting things like, ‘Judaism is wrong,’ I’m on the path to sin. They were talking negatively and denigratingly of Judaism and of me as a rabbi. And it was clear that these two individuals wanted a confrontation. And it was very alarming.”

Miller went back into the building and the incident ended when the men left in their car. He said the experience left him “quite shaken” and shocked him. He spoke about the incident publicly and observed that “I think for some it’s become a wake-up call.”

The next incident came on May 15 when 70 flyers were distributed to homes in the middle-income Naples Park neighborhood. The flyers, in plastic bags weighted with white rice, announced simply that “It’s okay to be white” with a picture of a mother and child. They also carried the death’s-head (Totenkopf) logo of the Aryan Freedom Network, the Web address “white-power.org” and the final line: “Distributed randomly without malicious intent.”

A flyer distributed in Naples Park. (Image: WINK News)

As its website reveals, the Aryan Freedom Network (AFN) is an overtly racist, neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic organization. According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an organization that works to combat anti-Semitism, the group, based in DeKalb, Texas, began as a white supremacist website in 2018 and became a membership organization in January 2022, working to unite a variety of white supremacist groups.

The ADL states: “AFN is led by Tonia Sue Berry (aka Daisy Barr) and Dalton Henry Stout (aka Brother Henry). Berry’s father was the late Indiana Klan wizard Jeff Berry, while her brother, Anthony Berry, was the Indiana state leader (Grand Dragon) for the now defunct Confederate White Knights. Stout’s father, George Stout, was a speaker at the 2018 ‘Arklatex White Unity Conference’ organized by Dalton and in 2021, the elder Stout was outed as a member of the Church of the Ku Klux Klan. Tonia Berry and Dalton Stout married in 2020 but appear to have divorced in April 2022.

“AFN is just the latest white supremacist group Dalton Stout has promoted or established in recent years,” it states.

Most recently, the AFN held a demonstration in Centerville, Texas, on June 4, replete with swastika flags and Nazi salutes.

An AFN demonstration in Centerville, Texas last Sunday, June 4. (Image: Twitter)

In Naples, a spokesman for the Collier County Sheriff’s Office told Naples Daily News reporter Tayeba Hussein that what they termed the “suspicious incident” of leafletting did not target “specific people.”

The random distribution and stated non-malicious intent is designed to get the leafletting around the prohibitions of HB 269, which makes it a crime to target specific individuals or make credible threats.

If the leafletting was intended to mobilize residents of Naples Park, all evidence indicates that it failed, instead sowing confusion and disgust.

“It’s what’s in your heart, you know, it’s your character. It’s not the color of your skin. And to have something like this is just offensive to me. I don’t agree with it,” resident Pam Haffener told WINK News. “It seems like it’s something that somebody just wants to stir up some trouble or something like that. I don’t know what any other reason somebody would drop something like that in the driveway.”

Analysis: Having an impact

Resolutions, legislation and a federal initiative may not seem very effective against acts of hatred on the ground but in fact they cumulatively bring considerable weight against bigots.

Anti-Semitism remains socially repulsive in American society. That’s not only evidenced by personal expressions and disapproving media coverage but in the legislation that has passed. All the most recent laws and resolutions were approved unanimously in their respective bodies. It shows bipartisan agreement and broad ideological commitment against anti-Semitism.  

Further, the whole body of American law continues to prohibit criminal expressions of hatred and threats against groups of people and individuals.

The Biden Strategy in particular is a broad, detailed, whole-of-society effort to contain, diminish and punish anti-Semitism. With its over-100 specific actions at the federal, state and local levels it is likely to have an incremental but profound impact over time. No government action can end blind bigotry but eventually such broad initiatives can make a difference and the prioritization of hate crimes means they will be prosecuted as effectively as possible.

The pity, of course, is that such a government strategy is necessary at all and that previous social mores, education and disapproval are no longer sufficient to keep this kind of hatred at bay.

Additionally, no candidate on the presidential campaign trail is espousing anti-Semitism as part of his or her official platform. However, both former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) have used anti-Semitic tropes to add to their appeal to Republican primary voters. DeSantis, however, made a pilgrimage to Israel, addressed the Museum of Tolerance Jerusalem and signed HB 269 while there.

Based on historical experience, the key tipping point in societies comes when government and the forces of civil order go over to the side of extremism, hatred and rage. In Germany that occurred in 1933 when Adolf Hitler was made chancellor and began implementing Nazi ideology in law and official policy. In the United States, it was Donald Trump, as President, who expressed approval for this kind of hate in 2017 with his remarks accepting the Charlottesville, Va., neo-Nazis and extremists. It has taken the two years since he left office to try to correct the imbalance he created.

Today, as distressing as anti-Semitic groups and activities are, it needs to be kept in mind that they are still small, fragmented, illicit and widely condemned. National and state law remains firm against them and the anti-Semitism they espouse. With the support of all people, that can continue to be the case.

When it comes to Florida, what seems likely to happen up until the election of 2024 is that the state’s government and Republican politicians will proceed in an extreme rightward direction. While this may play well with an aging, hard-core Make America Great Again (MAGA) base (which is what counts for the Republican presidential nomination), it’s likely to be rejected by the rest of the country. Culturally, Florida is likely to be left an isolated, remote anomaly among the states. If anti-Semitism is part of the Florida MAGA, anti-woke mix, then the Florida way is likely to be rejected by the rest of the country as well. It will leave the Sunshine State a cold, dark self-absorbed shadow of its former self.

The case of Collier County

Politically, these are tense times in Collier County and intense passions are in play. The county’s conservatism and Trumpism has emboldened far-right activists to try a variety of extreme experiments. These have included attempting to nullify federal law and enacting an anti-vaccination ordinance and resolution. This is driven by the activism of a small group of religious zealots, anti-vaxxers, anti-abortionists and MAGA adherents (or MAGAdonians, as Trump has termed them) who claim to speak for “we the people.”

Their efforts have been defeated, rebuffed or diluted to the point of ineffectiveness. In a particular setback, despite electoral success in electing MAGA candidates in the 2022 county School Board election, the MAGA choice for superintendent was narrowly defeated, a defeat that grocer and MAGA activist Francis Alfred “Alfie” Oakes III is trying to overturn through litigation. It was at the meeting where this vote took place that Rabbi Miller was accosted.

The anti-Semitism displayed in Collier County is partially driven by religious zeal, partially the outgrowth of ideological frustration, and partially an effort to exploit the area’s reputation for extreme conservatism. This may very well be the case with the Aryan Freedom Network’s efforts. It is entirely possible that only a single person is promoting the organization. He performed the leaflet drop in Naples Park trying to gain publicity and recruit new members. All evidence indicates that he failed.

To date, there has been no violence and no prosecutable hate crimes committed in Collier County, at least as publicly discernible.

Residents have to presume that if a chargeable crime is committed, the Collier County Sheriff’s Office will swiftly, effectively and impartially investigate and prosecute it. As long as there is confidence in unbiased and professional policing to keep public order and a willingness to pursue hate crime perpetrators, something of a lid can be kept on more dangerous actions.

However, given the political passions of the presidential campaign, especially at its center in Florida, residents simply have to expect more extreme rhetoric, more threats and more incidents in the days to come.

Legislation cannot change people’s hearts. There will always be hatred, prejudice and rage and that will include hatred against Jews for simply being Jews. But maybe, if Jews are active, stand firm, don’t panic and if democracy can be preserved in Collier County and the nation, the hatred, prejudice and rage can be contained and confined to the extreme fanatics and fringe fools where it usually resides.

None of this conflict manifests itself in Florida daily life or in Collier County. The sun shines, the shops are open, people are friendly and waves languidly lap the beautiful beaches.

But it’s worth remembering that on this day 79 years ago on a different beach in Normandy, France, American and allied forces had to fight to protect democracy from the danger posed by Fascism’s hatred, prejudice and rage. They won the fight then but the struggle hasn’t ceased. And here at home it needs to be won again today.

US forces land at Normandy on D-Day, June 6, 1944. (Photo: US Army)

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Debt bill passage saves SWFL vets, seniors, economy; Reps. Donalds, Steube vote to risk fiscal ruin; Diaz-Balart dissents, votes yes

The final vote on the debt ceiling bill. (Image: US House)

May 31, 2023 by David Silverberg

Southwest Florida (SWFL) veterans and seniors will have their benefits preserved thanks to passage of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (House Resolution (HR) 3746) by the US House of Representatives tonight. (The full 99-page text can be read here.)

The 9:21 pm vote on what is commonly known as the debt ceiling bill was 314 to 117.  It was the product of protracted negotiations between President Joe Biden and House Speaker Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-23-Calif.)

Some 149 Republicans voted for the bill, while 71 opposed it. Among Democrats 165 voted for it and 46 opposed it. Four members did not vote.

Southwest Florida Reps. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.) and Greg Steube (R-17-Fla.) voted against the bill.  Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-26-Fla.) voted for it.

Numerous experts, analysts and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that if the bill does not also pass the Senate by June 5, the United States could default on its debts, bringing an economic crash and collapsing the global financial system. SWFL, like the rest of the country, would suffer severe consequences, especially to its veterans and seniors.

“If Congress fails to increase the debt limit, it would cause severe hardship to American families, harm our global leadership position, and raise questions about our ability to defend our national security interests,” Yellen warned congressional leaders in a May 1 letter.

Potential consequences

Had it not passed, SWFL veterans were particularly at risk of losing their promised benefits. SWFL has a considerable veteran population. According to 2021 US Census figures, the latest available, there were 53,265 veterans living in Lee County, 22,747 in Collier County, and 20,413 in Charlotte County.

The bill maintains full funding for veterans’ health care. It increases support for the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act’s toxic exposure fund by nearly $15 billion for fiscal year 2024. The PACT Act is a law passed in the last Democratic-dominated Congress to benefit veterans exposed to harmful chemicals during their service.   

An important impact of the bill was not spelled out but is vital to SWFL: if approved, Social Security recipients will receive their checks without interruption or delay. Some 12,547 Lee County residents, 3,984 Collier County residents, and 2,945 Charlotte County residents were Social Security recipients as of December 2021, according to the Social Security Administration. Nationally, 65 million Americans receive Social Security benefits.

The bill changes eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known by its earlier name of food stamps. The bill changes the eligibility of people to receive SNAP assistance to the age of 54 where before it was 50. States will also be required to ensure that a higher percentage of welfare beneficiaries are working at least 20 hours per week under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.

As of 2022, according the Federal Reserve of St. Louis, there were 105,288 SNAP recipients in Lee County, 25,748 in Collier County and 17,257 in Charlotte County.

Other effects are much more spread out across the nation. They include:

  • Suspending annual passage of the debt ceiling for two years until after the 2024 election;
  • Keeping funding for most domestic programs flat for the remainder of Biden’s term in office;
  • Rescinding or “clawing back” $20 billion for modernization and expansion of the Internal Revenue Service;
  • Giving slight funding increases to the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments;
  • Ending student loan forgiveness 60 days after June 30 (i.e., Aug. 29);
  • Approving the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a natural gas pipeline from West Virginia to Virginia, which was added at the last minute as a concession to Sen. Joe Mancin (D-WVa.).

SWFL Republican reaction

Rep. Byron Donalds, along with other members of the Freedom Caucus, denounces the debt ceiling bill at a press conference on Tuesday, May 30. To his left is Rep. Lauren Boebert, to his right Rep. Andy Biggs. (Image: CSPAN)

Before the vote, on Monday, May 29, Donalds tweeted: “After I heard about the debt ceiling deal, I was a NO. After reading the debt ceiling deal, I am absolutely NO!!”

Donalds joined other Freedom Caucus members yesterday, May 30 in a press conference to denounce the bill, where he told his audience, “Washington is doing it again. While you were celebrating Memorial Day, [The Swamp] was cutting another crap deal, more debt with no real changes whatsoever.” Donalds argued that deal reached by Biden and McCarthy made insufficient cuts and did not return US spending to pre-pandemic levels.

He also denounced Biden administration environmental funding that was unaffected by the deal.

“The people of SWFL sent me here to get this place back on track,” Donalds tweeted prior to the vote last night. “This deal doesn’t do enough. We must get serious because interest on the debt will soon outpace all other spending.”

“I’m a no,” declared Steube in a formal statement prior to the vote. “While I was originally optimistic about some of the conservative wins found in the negotiated debt ceiling package, I have read the bill, heard from hundreds of my constituents, and ultimately cannot in good conscience vote for this legislation.”

As of this writing Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart’s (R-26-Fla.) only comment was tweeted on May 22, before the deal was announced.

“Reminder: Biden ignored the debt ceiling issue for 97 days, and this last-minute crunch time could have been avoided,” he tweeted. House Republicans “are the only ones that passed legislation to responsibly raise the debt ceiling and address our country’s debt crisis. We have done our part.”

Francis Rooney, the former 19th District Republican representative weighed in as well: “Default would not be in the best interest of our country and the Fiscal Responsibility Act would avoid that while getting some spending reductions,” he tweeted yesterday. “The bloated spending bills I voted against in Congress and the obscene spending the last 2 years are the real problem.”

At the state level, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), a candidate for the 2024 presidential nomination, denounced the deal. “Prior to this deal … our country was careening towards bankruptcy. And after this deal, our country will still be careening towards bankruptcy,” DeSantis said on “Fox & Friends.”

The bill now goes to the Democratic-majority Senate where it is expected to be swiftly approved and sent on to President Biden for signature, although there could be amendments that change its provisions. However, numerous senators have pledged not to delay its consideration. The United States is facing default if the bill is not finalized.

The United States Capitol. (Photo: Architect of the Capitol)

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Don or Ron? It’s time for SWFL politicians to choose sides

Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis in happier times. (AP/Brynn Anderson)

May 22, 2023 by David Silverberg

It can’t be put off any longer: Florida’s Republican politicians will have to choose between former President Donald Trump and Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to be the next Republican presidential nominee.

That choice will represent the biggest issue facing the Florida Republican Party between now and the primary. Voters won’t have to make their decisions until the Republican Florida presidential preference primary on March 19, 2024. But state Republican politicians have to make their choice now, as DeSantis’ formal declaration draws near and both sides demand oaths of fealty. By and large they have already done so.

In Southwest Florida (SWFL), declarations of loyalty came early and initially favored Trump, who declared his candidacy last November. However, at the state level the endorsements favored DeSantis.

Team Don

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.) was the first SWFL politician to endorse Trump, doing so on April 6. In a lengthy statement he said that Trump would get the country “back on track, provide strength and resolve and make America great again.” He has been actively campaigning for Trump ever since. Rumors are swirling that he is considering a gubernatorial bid in 2026.

Donalds was followed by Rep. Greg Steube (R-17-Fla.) who endorsed Trump during an appearance on Newsmax on April 17, saying “he’s the only person who can reverse on day one all these disastrous policies of the Biden administration.”

Also in the Trumpist column is Collier County Republican Committeeman Francis Alfred “Alfie” Oakes III, the grocer and long-time Make America Great Again (MAGA) activist. Oakes was present at Trump’s campaign announcement on Nov. 15 at Mar-a-Lago.

Team Ron

DeSantis has lagged behind on endorsements largely because he hasn’t been a declared candidate.

Nonetheless, state Senate President Sen. Kathleen Passidomo (R-28-Naples) endorsed DeSantis on May 16, in a statement calling him, “exactly the kind of leader we need for our country, and I look forward to supporting him for President.”

In the state House of Representatives SWFL Reps. Spencer Roach (R-76-DeSoto and Charlotte counties), Tiffany Esposito (R-77-Lehigh Acres), Jenna Persons-Mulicka (R-78-Fort Myers), Mike Giallombardo (R-79-Cape Coral), Adam Botana (R-80-coastal Lee County), Bob Rommel (R-81-Naples) and Lauren Melo (R-82-Hendry and Collier counties) have all endorsed DeSantis.

DeSantis was also endorsed by Florida House Speaker Rep. Paul Renner (R-19-Flagler and St. Johns counties).

What to watch

SWFL politicians to watch in the days ahead include Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-26-Fla.), who has not yet declared.

Neither of Florida’s senators, Republicans Marco Rubio or Rick Scott, have endorsed either candidate. Scott has stated that he is remaining neutral in the contest.

As of this writing, 13 Florida legislators had not made their commitments known.

Also unclear at this point are endorsements at the county and city level.

Endorsements are important indicators of Party support for candidates. The website FiveThirtyEight.com has an excellent, constantly updated interactive page on endorsements: “Which 2024 Republican Presidential Candidate Has The Most Endorsements?” It assigns different point values to endorsements based on the prominence and position of the endorsers. It currently shows Trump far ahead overall.

Clearly, Trump’s lead will change after DeSantis makes his announcement.

Below is the full list of state officeholders (arranged alphabetically by last name) who endorsed DeSantis as of May 17, courtesy of NewsChannel 8, Tampa.

Florida Senate

  • Senate President Kathleen Passidomo
  • Sen. Ben Albritton (Senate District (SD)-27))
  • Sen. Bryan Avila (SD- 39) 
  • Sen. Dennis Baxley (SD-13)
  • Sen. Jim Boyd (SD-20)
  • Sen. Jennifer Bradley (SD-6)
  • Sen. Jason Brodeur (SD-100)
  • Sen. Douglas Broxson (SD-1)
  • Sen. Danny Burgess (SD-23)
  • Sen. Colleen Burton (SD-12)
  • Sen. Alexis Calatayud (SD-38)
  • Sen. Jay Collins (SD-13)
  • Sen. Nick DiCeglie (SD-18)
  • Sen. Gayle Harrell (SD-31)
  • Sen. Travis Hutson (SD-7)
  • Sen. Blaise Ingoglia (SD-11)
  • Sen. Jonathan Martin (SD-33)
  • Sen. Debbie Mayfield (SD-19)
  • Sen. Keith Perry (SD-9)
  • Sen. Corey Simon (SD-3)
  • Sen. Jay Trumbull (SD-2)
  • Sen. Clay Yarborough (SD-4)

Florida House

  • Speaker of the House Paul Renner
  • Rep. Shane Abbott (House District (HD)-5)
  • Rep. Thad Altman (HD-32)
  • Rep. Danny Alvarez (HD-69)
  • Rep. Adam Anderson (HD-57)
  • Rep. Alex Andrade (HD-2)
  • Rep. Jessica Baker (HD-17)
  • Rep. Douglas Bankson (HD-39)
  • Rep. Webster Barnaby (HD-29)
  • Rep. FabiánBasabe (HD-106)
  • Rep. Melony Bell (HD-49)
  • Rep. Kimberly Berfield (HD-58)
  • Rep. Adam Botana (HD-80)
  • Rep. Robert Brackett (HD-34)
  • Rep. Chuck Brannan (HD-10)
  • Rep. James Buchanan (HD-74)
  • Rep. Jennifer Canady (HD-50)
  • Rep. Mike Caruso (HD-87)
  • Rep. Ryan Chamberlin (HD-24)
  • Rep. Linda Chaney (HD-61)
  • Rep. Chuck Clemons (HD-22)
  • Rep. Wyman Duggan (HD-12)
  • Rep. Tiffany Esposito (HD-77)
  • Rep. Tom Fabricio (HD-110)
  • Rep. Juan Fernandez-Barquin (HD-118)
  • Rep. Randy Fine (HD-33)
  • Rep. Alina Garcia (HD-115)
  • Rep. Sam Garrison (HD-11)
  • Rep. Mike Giallombardo (HD-79)
  • Rep. Karen Gonzalez Pittman (HD-65)
  • Rep. Peggy Gossett-Seidman (HD-91)
  • Rep. Michael Grant (HD-75)
  • Rep. Tommy Gregory (HD-72)
  • Rep. Griff Griffitts (HD-6)
  • Rep. Fred Hawkins (HD-35)
  • Rep. Jeff Holcomb (HD-53)
  • Rep. Berny Jacques (HD-59)
  • Rep. Sam Killebrew (HD-48)
  • Rep. Traci Koster (HD-66)
  • Rep. Chip LaMarca (HD-100)
  • Rep. Tom Leek (HD-28)
  • Rep. Vicki Lopez (HD-113)
  • Rep. Randy Maggard (HD-54)
  • Rep. Patt Maney (HD-4)
  • Rep. Ralph Massullo (HD-23)
  • Rep. Stan McClain (HD-27)
  • Rep. Lawrence McClure (HD-68)
  • Rep. Fiona McFarland (HD-73)
  • Rep. Lauren Melo (HD-82)
  • Rep. Kiyan Michael (HD-16)
  • Rep. Jim Mooney (HD-120)
  • Rep. Toby Overdorf (HD-85)
  • Rep. Bobby Payne (HD-20)
  • Rep. Daniel Perez (HD-116)
  • Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka (HD-78)
  • Rep. Rachel Plakon (HD-36)
  • Rep. Alex Rizo (HD-112)
  • Rep. Spencer Roach (HD-76)
  • Rep. Will Robinson (HD-71)
  • Rep. Bob Rommel (HD-81)
  • Rep. Joel Rudman (HD-3)
  • Rep. Michelle Salzman (HD-1)
  • Rep. Jason Shoaf (HD-7)
  • Rep. Tyler Sirois (HD-31)
  • Rep. David Smith (HD-38)
  • Rep. John Snyder (HD-86)
  • Rep. Paula Stark (HD-47)
  • Rep. Kevin Steele (HD-55)
  • Rep. Cyndi Stevenson (HD-18)
  • Rep. John Temple (HD-52)
  • Rep. Josie Tomkow (HD-51)
  • Rep. Dana Trabulsy (HD-84)
  • Rep. Chase Tramont (HD-30)
  • Rep. Keith Truenow (HD-26)
  • Rep. Kaylee Tuck (HD-83)
  • Rep. Taylor Yarkosky (HD-25)
  • Rep. Brad Yeager (HD-56)

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Southwest Florida and entire state likely to feel labor, economic woes from anti-immigration measures

Farm laborers load freshly picked produce. (Photo: Coalition of Immokalee Workers)

May 17, 2023 by David Silverberg

A pair of recently-passed anti-immigration and border restriction measures appear set to do significant economic and labor damage to Southwest Florida.

At the state level, on Wednesday, May 10 Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed Senate Bill 1718 into law, imposing new restrictions on immigration in Florida. At a Fort Myers news conference last Friday, May 12, he stated: “The border should be shut down. I mean, this is ridiculous what’s going on. You shut it down. You do need to construct a wall.”

At the national level, Southwest Florida Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-26-Fla.) led the Republican effort in the US House of Representatives to put new restrictions on immigration and revive the building of former President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall.

That measure, the Secure the Border Act of 2023 (House Resolution (HR) 2), passed in the House last Thursday, May 11, by a narrow vote of 219 to 213.

However, the bill is unlikely to make any headway in the Democratic-dominated Senate and President Joe Biden has promised to veto it.

(A note on terminology for this article: By definition, an “immigrant” is a person who has entered and/or settled in a country legally. All immigrants are, ipso facto, “legal” and technically there is no such thing as an “illegal immigrant” or “illegal immigration.” By contrast, a “migrant” is someone who is migrating from one place to another, whether or not over international borders. An “undocumented migrant” is someone who lacks proper documentation and permissions to travel or settle in a place. An “alien” is someone from another country, whether traveling or in residence, documented or not.)

State restrictions

According to its official summary, Florida’s new state law restricting immigration does the following (the tense has been altered to reflect its passage):

“Prohibits counties and municipalities, respectively, from providing funds to any person, entity, or organization to issue identification documents to an individual who does not provide proof of lawful presence in the United States; specifies that certain driver licenses and permits issued by other states exclusively to unauthorized immigrants are not valid in this state; requires certain hospitals to collect patient immigration status data information on admission or registration forms; requires the Department of Economic Opportunity to enter a certain order and require repayment of certain economic development incentives if the department finds or is notified that an employer has knowingly employed an unauthorized alien without verifying the employment eligibility of such person, etc.”

It appropriates $12 million to an Unauthorized Alien Transportation Program to transport migrants out of Florida.

The bill was introduced by state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia (R-11- Citrus, Hernando and Sumter counties) on March 7 and passed 27 to 10 on April 28. When considered in the state House, 17 amendments to alter it were all defeated and it passed on May 2 by a vote of 83 to 36.

Warning that there would be “huge, huge problems” when the pandemic-restrictive Title 42 lapsed, DeSantis said, “You are going to see a massive surge of illegal aliens, you have a duty to ensure that these borders are secure. This is a huge disaster on our hands,” when he signed the bill in Jacksonville on May 10. Ingoglia called it “the strongest state-led anti-illegal immigration bill ever brought forth.”

“Ron DeSantis’ legacy will forever be rooted in the fact that as the governor of the state of Florida, he signed into law the most brutal, inhumane, and anti-American immigration legislation that we’ve seen in the last 30 years of U.S. History,” Andrea Mercado, director of Florida Rising, a state voting rights organization, declared in a written statement. “It is a life-threatening, intimidating, and dangerous political stunt.”

The Hispanic Leadership Fund, a pro-business group based in Washington, DC, also slammed the new law, stating it “has a very serious potential to promote racial profiling and infringe on the rights of not just immigrants, but American citizens and their families,” according to Mario Lopez, the organization’s president.

The law takes effect on July 1.

The federal bill

On the national level, HR 2 does the following:

  • requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;
  • prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;
  • limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;
  • authorizes the removal of a non-US national to a country other than that individual’s country of nationality or last lawful habitual residence, whereas currently this type of removal may only be to a country that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;
  • expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person’s serious bodily injury or death;
  • authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-US nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;
  • prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;
  • authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;
  • imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and
  • requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.

“Border security is national security,” tweeted Diaz-Balart after its passage. “[House Republicans] passed my bill HR2 to take back control of the border while the Biden Admin keeps saying the border is secure. Biden admin needs to get its head out of the sand.”

On May 2, the National Migration Forum, a pro-immigration advocacy group, in an extensive analysis of the bill, called it “an expansive proposal [that] represents an enforcement-only approach to migration-related challenges at the United States-Mexico border and beyond.”

It continued: “In practice, the bill package would severely restrict the right to seek asylum in the US, curtail other existing lawful pathways, place unnecessary pressure on border communities, intensify labor shortages faced by small businesses and essential industries, establish new criminal penalties, and make other significant changes to U.S. immigration law.”  

A date for consideration of HR 2 by the Senate had not been set as of this writing.

Impacts on Southwest Florida

While much of the population of Southwest Florida resides on the coast, most of the region’s land is either protected from development or used for agriculture. The agricultural sector is heavily dependent on seasonal migrant labor. The new state restrictions will undoubtedly affect Southwest Florida’s economy, especially in agriculture, construction, hospitality, tourism and services.

When it comes to agriculture, major local crops include tomatoes, strawberries, melons and citrus. Ranching and livestock breeding are also part of the mix. An estimated 6,626 people were employed in Southwest Florida agriculture, according to the US Census as quoted by Florida Gulf Coast University’s 2022 Agriculture Southwest Florida Economic Almanac Series. Most field workers are migrants, whether documented or not, and work seasonally, depending on the crop.

 “Everybody is in a panic because nobody knows what’s going to happen,” immigration attorney Gina Fraga told WPTV in Palm Beach.

Denise Negron, the executive director of the Farmworker Coordinator Council of Palm Beach County, told the TV station: “I’ve been hearing that probably they will not be sending their kids to school, and they are afraid to go to work, and it’s sad,” she said.

The stresses on the agricultural labor force come on the heels of the devastation to crops and the agriculture industry in the area caused by Hurricane Ian. Directly in the storm’s path were roughly 375,000 acres of citrus; over 200,000 acres of vegetables; more than 180,000 acres of hay; as well as 95,000 acres of other field crops, like sugarcane, cotton, and peanuts, according to Growing Produce, an industry website.

One local voice calling for a balance between border security, immigration reform and agribusiness is the area’s former congressman, Francis Rooney, a Republican conservative.

“Congress must balance the need for border security with the need for workers. Secure the border, fix our visa and asylum systems, and finally solve the immigration issue instead of using it as a political football,” he tweeted on May 11.

In contrast, the sitting member of Congress representing coastal Lee and Collier counties, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.), has been relentlessly on the attack about border security, hammering Republican talking points and raising money for his own reelection, without addressing the impact on the district.

“Democrats ALWAYS wanted this massive surge at the border with no checks or balances AT ALL,” he tweeted on Monday, May 15. “What’s going on now is due to Biden’s recklessness & desire to end all Trump policies that ACTUALLY secured our border. Now they’re scrambling to find fixes to the problem Biden created.”

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers, a local farm labor advocacy group, put out a statement on HB 1718 that goes into detail about its possible effects on both labor and the economy. It merits quotation in full:

“We stand firmly against SB 1718, and against the fear, division, and economic hardship it will bring to Florida.  The malicious provision requiring public hospitals to ask for immigration status will cruelly discourage people in need of medical attention, including young children, from seeking the care they need.  The transportation provision will criminalize everyday Floridians – including travel team coaches and commercial bus drivers, parent chaperones on field trips, and small businesses keeping the state’s fragile economy running – for innocently traveling in and out of our state.  The law is inhumane, impossible to fairly enforce, and leaves our communities less safe and more divided than ever.  

“When it comes to the law’s inevitable economic impact, lawmakers in Tallahassee have missed critical lessons from recent history.  One need only look to the agricultural fields in Georgia, Alabama, and Arizona in 2010 and 2011, full of rotting peaches, peppers, and watermelons, to see the disastrous impact of anti-immigrant legislation on labor supply and tourism. In addition to the contribution immigrants make to our state’s economy every single day, which is easily measurable in ever-rising labor productivity and millions of tax dollars, the authors of this bill also entirely neglect the immeasurable gifts of immigrant families in our schools, our sanctuaries of faith, and our communities everywhere across our state.”

There has been discussion of boycotts of Florida, especially by truckers, particularly in Hispanic social media, although no protests or boycotts have been formally announced by established organizations.

Commentary: Putting the border in perspective

Southwest Florida has a direct stake in the situation on the US southwestern border and US immigration policy but the situation has been overly hyped and politicized to the point where a clear picture is not being presented to the public.

The Republican mantra is that the border is “open,” meaning completely uncontrolled and unregulated. That is simply not true. The United States has considerable controls both at its ports of entry and between them and is adding to them by surging its own resources.

There are “open” borders around the world and one of the most open used to be in Mexico’s south, where there were virtually no controls between Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. People would simply cross the river marking the boundary with Mexico on rafts, while truckers on the bridge crossing the river would bribe guards to let unexamined loads go through. That border has now been tightened up, thanks to US-Mexican agreements.

Migrants from Latin America cross into Mexico on rafts during a migration surge in the mid-2010s. (Photo: Author’s collection)

The purpose of rational border control is to facilitate legitimate trade and travel and keep illegal goods and unauthorized people out. US trade with Mexico was worth $614.5 billion in 2019, a commercial flow that neither the United States or Mexico want to cut off, which is what would happen if DeSantis had his way and closed the border.

While tensions between the United States and Mexico date back to Mexico’s independence in 1821, they were deliberately ratcheted up by Donald Trump during his candidacy in 2015.

In his very first speech as a candidate he accused Mexicans of “sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” He painted a picture that has persisted to this day and has not changed for his followers or in the minds of millions of Americans.

Trump’s solution was a brick and mortar wall along the US-Mexican border, which he proved unable to build during his time as president, even with a Republican-controlled Congress. The sections that were erected are already crumbling and corroding.

However, the mirage of a completely sealed, impermeable, walled border through which not a molecule passes continues to mesmerize MAGAs, Republican lawmakers as well as Trump, DeSantis and Diaz-Balart (whose parents came to the United States as refugees from Castro’s Cuba and whose aunt was Fidel Castro’s first wife). This delusional vision is being promoted in HR2 and on the campaign trail as candidates jostle for the 2024 presidential nomination.

What is happening at the border with Mexico is a surge of migrants seeking asylum that has overwhelmed many existing border resources. It needs to be pointed out, though, that asylum seekers are not migrants attempting to cross the border illegally or covertly. They are applying for asylum through procedures the United States has established. When Title 42 ended, contrary to the apocalypse that was feared, the number of applicants dropped by half and applicants were required to apply through an online application or face stiff penalties.

Asylum-seekers are now being processed and sent around the country for adjudication. Illegal border crossers are facing five-year penalties if caught.

Ultimately, the issues of border security and immigration are inextricably intertwined. Until there is comprehensive immigration reform, including a rational guest worker program that works for both labor and business, the crisis will continue. The US Congress came very close to bipartisan agreement on reforms in 2007 and 2013 but both failed in the face of intransigent opposition. The day may come when another effort is made.

The current surge needs to be put into context because the United States is not unique. About 2.3 percent of the world’s population—184 million people, including 37 million refugees—live outside their country of nationality, according to the World Bank.

There is a global south-to-north movement of people seeking better lives, simple refuge, or fleeing climate change and life-threatening situations. In an effort to enter Europe, waves of African migrants have attempted to overwhelm the border controls of the two remaining Spanish possessions in North Africa, the cities of Ceuta and Melilla. In the Mediterranean Sea, migrants from the Middle East and northern Africa have set out on rickety, overcrowded boats to reach Spain, Italy, Greece, Cyprus and Malta. In Asia, poverty in Bangladesh and oppression in Myanmar have led people to flee those countries. Wars in Ukraine, Syria, and Sudan have led to massive refugee flows that directly impact neighboring countries, which try to cope as best they can while providing humanitarian aid.

Around the world, people are on the move toward better lives, greater freedom and simple safety. The United States is no exception.

What is complicating the American situation is the continuing MAGA view of migrants as criminals and rapists threatening the white population physically, politically and demographically.

It also reflects a deliberate attack on American confidence in the power of rationality and the strength of American values. In the past, Americans had confidence that their democracy, their values and their freedoms were so compelling that they could absorb and convert immigrants into loyal, productive Americans. Now, they want to exclude them on the basis of race and national origin. They no longer believe that America is an idea all can embrace; to them it’s a club that should exclude everyone but themselves.

In the short term, Florida’s attempted exclusion of immigrants will work to its detriment and at a cost to its economy and businesses. It is only with time that it will learn just how deep, painful and costly it will prove—and soon, Southwest Florida will be among the first regions to feel those effects.

________________

Editor’s note: From 2004 to 2012 the author served as editor of the magazine Homeland Security Today, which extensively covered border security and policy. A three-part series on Mexico’s drug cartel wars, their history and causes that he conceived, organized and edited, “Savage Struggle on the Border,” won the 2010 National Gold Award for Best Feature Series from the American Society of Business Publication Editors. In 2014 he was also founding editor of the BorderNewsNetwork.com, an online effort to cover news of all the world’s borders.

A US Border Patrol agent examines a shipment of jalapeno peppers destined for the United States for contraband and contamination. (Photo: CBP)

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

DeSantis’ book warns of danger to America—from him

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis promotes his book in Davenport, Iowa on March 10 of this year. (Photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

May 9, 2023 by David Silverberg

Any day now, Florida Gov. Ronald DeSantis (R) is going to declare his candidacy for President of the United States.

The legislative session is over. An exception has been made to the state’s resign-to-run law enabling him to run. Trips to key primary states have been made and an international tour has attempted to establish his international credentials (with very mixed success). Consultants have been hired, funds raised and an organization built. All the gears are grinding toward a presidential campaign.

Among his many preparations, a book has been published under DeSantis’ name called The Courage to Be Free: Florida’s Blueprint for America’s Revival.

It’s easy to dismiss candidate campaign books and political autobiographies. They’re written and published with clear ends in mind: to prepare the way for future runs and/or to justify past actions. An effective campaign book does both.

Yet for all their self-serving ends, all the staff-written ghost writing, all the vetting and editing and weighing of words, often by committees, they can still be revealing. They’re especially valuable for explaining political goals and ends. No matter how little the actual author did the writing, they still unveil a personality and an individual’s thinking.  

One of history’s most complete and revealing campaign books was Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Perhaps if more people had actually read it and realized what he was saying when it was first published he would have been stopped and there wouldn’t have been a Second World War.

The Courage to Be Free is not Mein Kampf. But it is a DeSantis manifesto and worth careful reading, review and analysis.

A simple style for simple readers

Stylistically, this is a very plain and easily read book. It’s very straightforward and accessible in its narrative.

DeSantis has a distinctive “voice” but it’s not present throughout the book. His introduction, “A Florida Blueprint” lays out his ideology and doctrinal principles. This is the one chapter that doesn’t “sound” like him. It’s stilted, almost as though copied verbatim from some conservative political cribsheet, or perhaps it represented his first writing effort, or his final summary. Whatever the reason, if there’s any chapter that reads as though it were written by a different author, this is it.

It also appears that DeSantis and any co-author or editors decided that this was the chapter most likely to be hastily skimmed by casual readers, voters or journalists and they wanted to get their doctrinal material up front.

It is in this introduction that DeSantis lays out his main themes: that the United States is run by illegitimate “elites,” that he is a bold and brave governor, that his governorship led to freedom and success and that Florida under his administration represents the future.

“Florida has consistently defended its people against large institutions looking to cause them harm—from public health bureaucrats looking to keep kids out of school to large corporations trying to undermine the rights of parents and to federal agencies trying to push people out of work due to COVID shots,” he writes.

Much of the rest of the book is more personal. It’s a memoir of his upbringing, life in politics and rise through the ranks. It recounts his time as a representative in Congress and his run for governor. It then goes over the issues he tackled in office and why he tackled them the way he did.

Like his prose, the person that emerges from this book is relatively straightforward and simple. DeSantis is not a deep thinker, although he’s careful to cite credible sources, especially the Federalist Papers, for his arguments. However, there isn’t any introspection, or contemplation or even nuanced consideration of larger issues. While there’s some acknowledgement of wider causes and effects, there’s little attempt to derive insight from them. Unlike, for example, a Henry Kissinger memoir, there’s no effort to peer deeply into a topic and reflect on the history behind it or draw lessons from it. Once DeSantis has made his assumptions and has his set conceptions the rest follows, largely without reflection.

DeSantis was a baseball athlete in school and one cannot help but consider that this is the kind of account that any jock might produce for a sports memoir.

Trump vs. Trump-lite

Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign book.

DeSantis’ main political rival at this point in time is former president, former mentor and fellow Floridian, Donald J. Trump. Trump is certainly a topic in DeSantis’ book but a gingerly treated one.

It’s interesting to contrast DeSantis’ memoir with Trump’s own 2016 campaign book, Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again.

Reading Crippled America was a fascinating, if exhausting, experience. No matter what the topic being addressed at the top of any page, by the bottom of the page the prose had turned to an extravagant, adulatory paean to Donald Trump. Every. Single. Page.

As the world discovered during his presidency and afterwards, Donald Trump loves Donald Trump. But not just “loves.” The English language does not quite have the words that fully convey his self-regard. “Selfish,” “egomaniacal,” “narcissistic” all apply but not at the cosmic depth and intensity that burned from the pages of Crippled America. In this book Trump was revealed as a universe unto himself, a universe with a single inhabitant at whose core was not a soul but a throbbing black hole of me-ness that sucked in all energy, light and life.

Mercifully, even if the DeSantis personality that emerges from Courage is simple and often simplistic, at least it has some grip on reality.

It’s very interesting to contrast the DeSantis and Trump accounts of Trump’s endorsement of DeSantis for governor when he first ran. Then, DeSantis was an obscure congressman running against Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putnam, an overwhelmingly favored rival for the Republican gubernatorial nomination.

As DeSantis tells it: “In late 2017, I asked the president if he would be willing to send out a tweet touting me as a good candidate for Florida governor. He seemed amenable, but at the same time, I was not holding my breath; the president has a lot on his plate, and this was not likely to rank on his list of things to do. About a week later, a Trump tweet appeared:

“Congressman Ron DeSantis is a brilliant young leader, Yale and then Harvard Law, who would make a GREAT Governor of Florida. He loves our Country and is a true FIGHTER!”

That’s it. He then goes on to recount the campaign and how he won.

As Trump told the story in a lengthy, rambling, digressive interview with Sean Hannity, DeSantis requested a meeting with him and, “with tears in his eyes” begged for an endorsement. Although Trump thought DeSantis had little chance, saying: “Ron, you’re so far behind I can’t imagine that if you got George Washington’s endorsement, combined with the late, great Abraham Lincoln, if you had their endorsements, that you would win,” Trump decided to take a chance because, unlike Putnam, DeSantis had defended Trump against impeachment charges. Trump describes the endorsement as variously having the impact of a nuclear bomb or a rocket launch.

That the endorsement made the difference in the race is undeniable, although Trump gets next to no credit in DeSantis’ book.

Despite the bad blood that has bubbled between the two men, DeSantis continues to defend Trump against charges of Russian collusion. He does this, however, in the context of attacking what he always calls the “legacy media.”

 “The Mount Everest of anonymous source-fueled political narratives was the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theory, which was a media-driven hoax designed to cast doubt on the results of the 2016 presidential election and strangle the Trump presidency in the crib,” he writes. “The theory—that Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russian government to steal the 2016 presidential election—represented perhaps the most serious charge ever leveled against an American president.”

(Russia’s involvement in the 2016 presidential campaign was extensively documented in the Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election by Robert Mueller. The role that Florida played is covered in the 2019 article, “Trump, Florida, Russia: Tracking the Sunshine State in the Mueller Report.”)

It is noteworthy that nowhere in the book does DeSantis mention Trump’s incitement of the January 6th insurrection and its mob violence, even as he condemns disorder. “Since mob violence constitutes a mortal threat to social order, swift and strong accountability is the only logical response,” he writes, touting his own anti-protest legislation. He condemns rioters in Portland, Oregon in the wake of George Floyd’s death but not those who attacked the United States Capitol, tried to destroy Congress and overturn the election.

Of course, in the Trump universe DeSantis has gone from “a brilliant young leader” to “Ron Desanctimonious” and “Meatball Ron.” However, if there’s any resentment on DeSantis’ part, it never made it into the book.

Instead, DeSantis’ resentment is reserved for other targets, those that will resonate with Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) base and presumably win DeSantis the nomination.

The targets

Chief among DeSantis’ targets are “elites.”

“Whom, exactly, are these elites?” DeSantis asks in his introduction. He relies on a definition provided by author and academic Angelo Codevilla, defining them as an “ideological, incompetent, and self-interested ‘ruling class’ that has consolidated power over American society in the past fifty years.”

He continues: “These elites are ‘progressives’ who believe our country should be managed by an exclusive cadre of ‘experts’ who wield authority though an unaccountable and massive administrative state. They tend to view average Americans with contempt, believe in the need for wholesale social engineering of American society, and consider themselves entitled to wield power over others.”

Of course, unmentioned is the fact that these “elites,” ever more open to talent, intelligence and education rather than heredity or class or race, led the United States through a Great Depression, a world war, a Cold War, a terrorist war, and made the country the richest and mightiest in history with the widest distribution of prosperity. They shaped the world according to rational rules that spread democracy and secured a rough peace for nearly a century.

But no matter, throughout the rest of the book, DeSantis wages rhetorical war on these elites and experts whenever possible.

He does not overlook his own elite Ivy League education at Yale University, where he graduated magna cum laude, and Harvard Law. But DeSantis maintains that he was untainted by elitism.

“Experiencing unbridled leftism on campus pushed me to the right,” he writes. “I had no use for those who denigrated our country or mocked people of faith.” Although he thought that the leftist ideas he found on campus would whither in the light of reality, he writes that he was mistaken. On the contrary, “the ideology that dominates so many major institutions in American life, including our largest corporations, is a clear reflection of the campus dogma that has infected a generation of students at elite American universities.”

It is when it comes to this ideological combat that DeSantis’s book proves most valuable because it puts his actions as governor into an overall context. Like many other conservatives, DeSantis sees all of American society dominated by an elite-guided “woke” ideology. “These elites control the federal bureaucracy, lobby shops on K Street, big business, corporate media, Big Tech companies, and universities,” he writes.

DeSantis is at war with all these institutions and the book documents his battles. His attacks on the Florida university system and its professors are just one part of his ideological crusade. His war with the Disney Company is a front in his struggle against a “woke” corporate culture. His attacks on “Big Tech” are an essential element of his battle with elites.

DeSantis devotes an entire chapter to the COVID-19 pandemic and his response to it.

“Florida bucked the ‘experts’ and charted a course that sought to maintain the functioning of society and the overall health of its citizenry,” he writes of the pandemic. “Power-hungry elites tried to use the coronavirus to impose an oppressive biomedical security state on America but Florida stood as an impenetrable roadblock to such designs.

“We also recognized the intellectual bankruptcy and brazen partisanship of the public health elites, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci. The performance of these so-called experts—they were wrong on the need for lockdowns, the efficacy of cloth masks, school closures, the existence of natural immunity and the accuracy of epidemiological ‘models’—was so dreadful that no sane person should ever ‘trust the experts’ ever again.”

DeSantis goes into great detail describing how he and his surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, disproved the data coming out of Washington and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and reached their own conclusions about defying the guidance and administering vaccines—or not.

“I was not going to allow our state to descend into a Faucian dystopia in which people’s freedoms were curtailed and their livelihoods destroyed,” DeSantis writes. “Florida protected individual freedom, economic opportunity and access to education—and our state is much better for it.”

While DeSantis acknowledges that there was some “mortality” in Florida from COVID, the 86,850 Floridians who died from COVID or the 7.5 million who were stricken get short shrift. Nor does he have a word of praise or appreciation for the healthcare workers who struggled to care for and cure them. These people, living and dead, apparently did not merit mention.

He also doesn’t address a two-week period in December 2021 when he disappeared from public view and rumors swirled that he had a bout of COVID. (In an almost-covert act, DeSantis received a vaccination in April 2021.)

In addition to the “biomedical security state,” throughout the book DeSantis constantly attacks what he variously calls the “legacy media,” or “corporate media,” and, of course, what Trump characterized as the “fake news.”

On this issue, DeSantis does have a solid example of shoddy reporting to bolster his claims: the 2021 report by the television show “60 Minutes.” That broadcast, “A Fair Shot,” irresponsibly and inaccurately drew a connection between DeSantis and the award of a contract to provide COVID vaccines through the Publix supermarket chain. (To read in-depth coverage of the incident and Publix politics, see “Publix: Where politics bring no pleasure.”) “60 Minutes” was condemned by just about all parties for implying wrongdoing where none was proven and using smear tactics to further its preferred story.

However, despite this legitimate complaint about this particular report, DeSantis’ hatred of the media is painted with a far broader brush. He agrees with Trump’s infamous tweet that the media “is the enemy of the American people.” (This came one month into Trump’s presidency when the world refused to buy his obviously false insistence that he’d had the largest inaugural crowd in history).

For DeSantis, “The national legacy press is the praetorian guard of the nation’s failed ruling class, running interference for elites who share their vision and smearing those who dare to oppose it. All too often, the legacy press operates in bad faith, elevates their preferred narratives over facts, and indulges in knee-jerk partisanship.”

He writes: “Legacy media outlets have evolved into something akin to state-run media. They do not seek to hold the powerful accountable. Instead, they protect the nation’s left-leaning ruling class, including the permanent bureaucracy in Washington and Democratic elected officials.”

DeSantis also fully explains his feud with the Disney Corporation in a chapter titled “The magic kingdom of woke corporatism.”

DeSantis sees private companies as purely political entities, writing, “corporate America has become a major protagonist in battles over American politics and culture. The battle lines almost invariably find large, publicly-traded corporations lining up behind leftist causes. It is unthinkable that these large companies would side with conservative Americans on issues such as the Second Amendment, the right to life, election integrity and religious liberty.”

Guns and mass shootings get only passing mention, as in DeSantis’ Second Amendment reference above. The 2018 Parkland shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School resulted in new gun reforms in Florida, which DeSantis stated he would have vetoed had he been governor at the time. Otherwise, he writes, “Rather than a firearms issue, I viewed the Parkland massacre as a catastrophic failure of leadership that cried out for accountability.” He blames the Broward County sheriff for the shooting and points to spending $750 million on school safety measures during his tenure.

This is particularly interesting because on June 14, 2017, after a baseball practice, DeSantis and another congressman were approached by a man who asked if baseball players on a playing field in Alexandria, Va., were Republicans or Democrats. DeSantis’ companion said they were Republicans and then the two went to a car and left. It was only later in the morning when he was in the congressional gym that he learned the man had shot at the players, wounding Rep. Steven Scalise (R-1-La.) before being killed himself.

In other hands, this incident would be an excellent opportunity to reflect on the problem of gun violence in America, or the need for more widespread mental health care, or even the fragility of life. DeSantis only relates that he was relieved he left practice early.

Other than a similarly passing reference to “the right to life,” DeSantis doesn’t examine the abortion issue in Florida in the book. As governor he signed into law a ban on abortions after six weeks, although he didn’t address—or discourage—calls to ban abortions completely.

Another subject that gets short shrift is foreign policy. As a congressman, DeSantis supported moving the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. He also opposes Chinese Communist Party activities in the United States. Other than that, the world outside Florida doesn’t interest him much, at least as far as his book is concerned.

Analysis: Florida and the future

Political autobiographies usually set out to do two things: get the author elected and provide a blueprint for what he or she would do if elected.

In terms of getting DeSantis elected, the book certainly spells out what he believes and how he perceives the world. Theoretically, it should confirm the biases and orientations of the Trumpist, MAGA base, whose votes DeSantis is seeking.

However, whatever his thoughts and feelings, as long as Trump is in the race DeSantis can only run as “Trump-lite” and the master himself will provide the pure, unadulterated hatred, prejudice and rage that MAGA addicts crave.

This brings up another factor evident in the book—and one that is actually commendable.

Nowhere in the book does DeSantis advocate violence or extralegal measures. Trump, by contrast, encouraged violence among his followers and even took physically violent action himself. On Jan. 6, thwarted by his electoral failure, he incited a full-scale riot and insurrection, encouraged the attempted lynching of his vice president and grabbed the throat of a Secret Service agent who wouldn’t drive him to the Capitol. He has never apologized or expressed regret or remorse (or been held to account) for any of this and he’s touted incarcerated rioters as political prisoners. He’s never condemned violence in principle.

DeSantis presents himself as a law and order governor and so there are no insinuations or incitements to political violence in his book (or during his appearances). This is not to be overlooked or minimized or, for that matter, taken for granted. Political violence is a hallmark of true fascism and Trump encouraged it as part of national political life.

However, it would be especially commendable if, as part of his condemnation of mob violence, DeSantis would also take a firm, principled stand condemning the insurrection of Jan. 6 and those who participated in it. In the absence of that, he does what he accuses the left of doing; applying the law and condemnation selectively, depending on the cause and the participants in the disorder.

That said, in its first goal of getting him the nomination, the DeSantis book might win over a few wavering Trumpers but it’s unlikely to convert anyone outside the MAGA orbit to DeSantism. Its narrative is not so compelling or its arguments so powerful that it will sweep voters into his corner.

Looking to its larger purpose of providing a blueprint for governing, the book will likely prove repugnant to thinking Americans who don’t want Trump or a Trump-like president.

The key reason for this is that for all their differences, Trump and DeSantis share a most important characteristic: both are absolutists.

Trump classifies people by their personal loyalty to him. For DeSantis, the dividing line is whether they agree with his agenda, the one spelled out in this book. Ultimately, though, both men want absolute obedience—and that is not the American way.

DeSantis’ demands are perhaps somewhat more complex and more subtly expressed than Trump’s but their intents are the same. DeSantis is at war with “woke” as he defines it and whether it’s individual citizens or schools or universities or businesses or corporations or scientists or public servants or the media, he doesn’t want them thinking the way he opposes. He doesn’t want to convince them to his thinking, he wants to crush their heresy through legislation, legal action or all the tools of the state.  

As Floridians are finding out, no one is safe from DeSantist demands, whether those demands are made by the governor himself or by a servile legislature competing to implement this absolutist agenda.

As so many would-be tyrants have proven through history, absolute agendas of this sort may be called “freedom” by their advocates but in practice they’re anything but free. DeSantis may claim that he’s showing courage by pursuing absolute power despite criticism and opposition. Maybe, though, his opponents and detractors see something different and more oppressive to which he himself is blind.

So in many ways, it’s a good thing that Ron DeSantis has laid out his blueprint for America’s “revival” in The Courage to Be Free. By reading it and being aware of his agenda, freedom-loving Americans will gain their own wisdom and have their own courage to ensure that America stays free from his absolutism—which threatens them so absolutely.

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

An open memo to Nikki Fried: A request of the Florida Democratic Party

Florida Democratic Chairwoman Nikki Fried. (Image: Florida Democratic Party)

April 28, 2023

To: Nikki Fried, Chairwoman, Florida Democratic Party

From: The Paradise Progressive

RE: Request

Chairwoman Fried:

Back on March 15 you tweeted an open request for suggestions for the Florida Democratic Party: “Tell me what you want to see from your new @FlaDems Party. Today, this cycle, this decade. I’ll read the replies.”

The most constructive and long-term contribution I believe you can make to the Florida Democrats is to define what the Party is for.

I don’t mean issues; the Democratic Party has plenty of good issues. But the opposition has themes, broad, simple concepts that they can pound into the most primitive brains.

I’m writing from a lone liberal perspective way down at the bottom of the state and at the root of the grassroots—or in the sand, the sawgrass and the mangroves, as it were. Here in deep red, fanatically MAGA Southwest Florida, Democrats are outnumbered 65 percent to 35 percent in party registrations.

Anyone on any street corner in Southwest Florida can tell you in a nutshell what MAGA Trumpers believe; basically, God, guns and Trump, as well as, in no particular order: no vaccines, no health mandates, no science, no education, no church-state separation, no abortion, no women’s rights, no learning, no tolerance, no immigrants, no voting, no government and no inclusion.

A souvenir t-shirt sold in Naples, Fla. (Photo: June Fletcher)

Democratic principles can’t be recited the same way by either friends or foes. They’re all over the place. Will Rogers’ old adage still holds true: “I don’t belong to an organized political party. I’m a Democrat.”

What is more, DeSantis, Republicans, MAGAs and Trumpers have successfully used the most extreme fringe causes of the Democratic Party to shape the party’s identity in the public mind. They are defining the Democratic Party.

So what would be most helpful would be a three-word encapsulation of the Party’s core values and principles. Three-element slogans have enormous power. (For example, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” or “our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor” or “liberté, egalité, fraternité” or “truth, justice and the American way.” Donald Trump himself once inadvertently best characterized his principles as “hatred, prejudice and rage.”)

If it were up to me, I’d like to see the Party’s principles be “democracy, dignity and justice.” But while that floats my boat, I’m not sure how it would focus-group. There may be more effective slogans out there. The main point, though, is that the Democratic Party has to stand for something positive and whatever that is has to be clear, simple and strong.

So, I’m just asking for three words. Any three words you think would work. I think if you can provide them, we’ll all be better off.

Thank you for your time and attention and I’m available for any questions or to provide any further information you may require.

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Collier County interfaith group warns against religious indoctrination by school superintendent candidates

The Collier County School Board building. (Photo: CCSB)

April 25, 2023 by David Silverberg

A newly-formed interfaith group in Collier County, Fla., is warning members of the county School Board to avoid allowing religious indoctrination in the school system by selecting a religiously-oriented new superintendent of schools.

“We strongly encourage the Board of Education to ask its finalists their position on this important issue: Does the candidate understand that public schools cannot seek to promote, teach, or persuade students—either directly or indirectly—to adopt the specific values and worldviews of any religion?  Or, does the candidate believe that we should ‘return God’ to schools and teach Christian values? If yes, that candidate should be disqualified,” says the statement from Kristin Muschett and Rev. Sharon Harris-Ewing, the co-leaders of the Interfaith Alliance of Southwest Florida.

Selection of the superintendent is down to two candidates: Leslie Ricciardelli, who is currently serving as the interim superintendent of the school system and has 23 years’ experience in the district in a wide variety of capacities, and Charles Van Zant Jr., whose chief qualification is service as superintendent of the Clay County School District in Green Cove Springs, Fla., for four years from 2012 to 2016.

Both candidates will be interviewed for the position at a special board meeting at 8 am tomorrow, April 26.

A final selection is scheduled to be made at the regular Board meeting on May 9 at 4:30 pm.

Ricciardelli rose through the ranks of the Collier County school district, serving as a teacher, principal, assistant principal, dean of attendance and discipline, executive director of teaching and learning and then assistant superintendent of school learning before stepping into the role of interim superintendent upon the departure of Kamela Patton, who abruptly left the school district last December following the election of the new school Board.

“Throughout my career I have focused on ensuring that all students have the support and resources they need to succeed, regardless of their background or ability level,” Ricciardelli stated in her application to the Board. “Those who know me best will describe me as serious, collaborative, and passionate about my work. I am committed to making decisions that are transparent, data-driven, and in the best interests of all students, staff and administrators while being mindful and respectful of the desires of our parents.”

The initial search for a superintendent was made by the executive search firm Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates (HYA).

HYA described Van Zant as a “nontraditional hybrid candidate.” He served for 32 years in the US Army, rising to the rank of lieutenant colonel. His experience is primarily in the field of human resources and education-related business development. He told the Board in his application that, “I am encouraged to see traditional and conservative values returning to Florida schools.”

During the 2022 campaign for school Board there was a strong inclination to inject religious indoctrination into the school system among many of the candidates.

The Interfaith Alliance’s concern that religious indoctrination from a single faith might be introduced into Collier County’s schools is based on these statements. The Alliance supports separation of church and state in the classroom.

The Interfaith Alliance was formed this month in Collier County. It consists of lay people and clergy from different traditions and is committed to “advocate for an inclusive vision of religious freedom challenging both the idea that any religion is the single, authentic voice of faith and the deeply harmful effects of extremist rhetoric and legislation.” It also seeks “to protect local communities from bigotry, discrimination, prejudice, racism, and all forms of hate.”

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Collier County health ordinance takes effect; worst damage to public was avoided

The Collier County Board of Commissioners votes to approve the proposed ordinance on April 11, 2023. (Photo: CCBP)

April 21, 2023 by David Silverberg

The health ordinance passed on April 11 by the Collier County Board of Commissioners is now in force, having been filed with the state of Florida on April 17.

The Collier County Commission vote came one day after President Joe Biden signed a bipartisan congressional resolution officially declaring the COVID emergency at an end.

Given significant revisions in its final version, the “Collier County Health Freedom Ordinance,” does no harm to hospital operations or the public, as its initial version threatened to do.

However, in the event of another infectious disease outbreak along the lines of COVID-19, public health measures will be less effective and more difficult to implement.

The ordinance and its accompanying resolution, which is a statement of county opinion rather than law, were introduced by Commissioner Chris Hall (R- 2-North Naples) and unanimously approved after a session that saw 52 speakers weigh in on the measure, most opposing it. The resolution was approved by a 4 to 1 vote, with Commissioner Burt Saunders (R-3-eastern Collier) voting against it.

Opponents included two speakers from the Collier County Medical Association and the president of the local League of Women Voters. Most of the opponents were long-time residents of Collier County.

Proponents included the COVID Tyranny Task Force, a loose group of perhaps 100 people in the Naples area and anti-vaccine (anti-vaxx) activists from outside Florida.

(Links to the full text of both the final ordinance and the resolution are at the end of this article.)

The ordinance

The main change between the draft and the final versions of the ordinance was a weakening of a requirement for unanimous votes of the Board to impose mask mandates or require vaccine “passports” from the public. It also established that vaccination mandates cannot be imposed on Collier County employees.

The ordinance established no new county authority since Chapter 381 of the Florida statutes prohibits mask or vaccine mandates and supersedes any county measure, as acknowledged by the ordinance. The state law took effect in November 2021. If there are changes to state law, county law will change as well.

Otherwise, the final version of the ordinance follows the same establishing clauses (“whereases”) in the original. These initial four paragraphs state that numerous county residents expressed their concerns about federal government authority and World Health Organization (WHO) efforts to impose health mandates.

Both the original and final versions (as well as state law) prohibit businesses and the county from requiring vaccine or “post-infection recovery documentation” to receive service or entry.

Both versions prohibit private employers from imposing vaccine mandates on employees or requiring testing. If this rule is violated employees are eligible for re-employment as well as civil damages. Similarly, employees wishing to get vaccinations cannot be stopped from doing so by their employers.

Any penalties for violation will be in accordance with those imposed by state law.

The resolution

In contrast to the ordinance, the resolution underwent extensive rewriting. It will not affect medical treatment, hospital authority and is unlikely to impede public safety measures in the future.

The most significant deletion from the resolution’s initial draft was removal of a clause providing for a “right to mental health review” and prohibiting anyone in Collier County from being held for mental health reasons for longer than 72 hours without a jury trial. This addressed a fear of involuntary institutionalization for mental health reasons among anti-vaxxers.

Proponents of the original resolution also wanted to compel hospitals to follow patients’ wishes over the directives of doctors and medical professionals. It sought to force hospitals to recognize power of attorney conferred by patients and made legal, family and personal doctor visitation a right as opposed to a convenience. (During the worst of the pandemic, visits by all outsiders were limited by hospital administrators due to the extreme infectiousness of the disease.)

Furthermore, it held that if a patient wants to leave a hospital even against medical advice, “the hospital must immediately release the patient.” While not explicitly stated, this includes forcing hospitals to release patients who may be infectious and might harm the wider community.

The final version affirmed the right to patient visits by advocates, families and personal doctors but did not make allowing the visits compulsory on the hospital. However it does state that hospitals “must” release patients if they want to depart, even against medical advice.

Also extensively deleted from the original version was an attack on every outside federal agency and international scientific body.

“Human rights are given to us by God,” declared the original resolution, and “these rights cannot be restricted or infringed by United States and foreign bodies such as but not limited to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the “CDC”), the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”), United States Department of Health and Human Services (the “HHS”), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (the “NIAID”) , the World Health Organization (the “WHO”), the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), corporations and the United Nations.”

All that verbiage was removed from the final version, which simply states that the US and Florida constitutions protect Floridians’ rights “against any mandates from the World Health Organization or any other international body.” It kept the reference to God.

While the initial draft had 14 establishing clauses, three were deleted entirely and these were the most extreme and accusatory. One argued that health protections given to hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and medical professionals along with mandates left Collier County citizens “subject to death and injury with little recourse.” Another stated that the Pfizer vaccine had caused deaths, sickness and injury and this information was censored in Collier County. The third stated flatly that the US and Florida constitutions were “no longer upheld” in Collier County.

Other establishing clauses were moderated.

The opening clause stated that federal and state health agencies displayed “a clear inability to be truthful, transparent and consistent.” This was moderated to state that they had “not demonstrated transparency and consistency” in protecting citizens.

While the draft version held that constitutional rights “were violated,” that was softened to state they were “possibly” violated. The draft version argued that doctors “are no longer” allowed to speak freely (presumably about the supposed benefits of discredited treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin). The final version stated they “were” not allowed to speak freely, putting the problem in the past.

The last establishing clause held that the resolution was being adopted because of the “failings of our federal, state, and local governments and healthcare institutions, which are directly causing harm, including death,” to citizens of Collier County. When rewritten, the final version stated the resolution was necessary because of “injustices and decisions” (rather than “failings”) of “three letter agencies” and these faulty decisions caused “potential” harm and “even” death. Lastly, the final version states that the Board of Commissioners “intends” to protect the constitutionality of its citizens rather than just flatly stating that this is what the resolution does.

Analysis: Venting rage vs. protecting health

As was pointed out during the debate over the ordinance, the real authority for establishing health mandates—or prohibiting them—lies with the state of Florida, which already forbids mandates. The Collier County ordinance simply restates this on the county level.

Essentially, the whole ordinance/resolution package was introduced to give vent to the accumulated anger and frustration of anti-vaxxers and opponents of public health protections over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. They opposed vaccines, masking, or any restrictions on their behavior because an infectious disease was ravaging the world. Protecting their fellow citizens was not a priority and they rejected all established experts, credible scientific evidence and government efforts, especially those by federal agencies. Encouraged by a president who promoted denialism, they put faith in unproven and ineffective nostrums and remedies that the medical world rejected based on scientific evaluation. Now the political forces in Collier County are aligned in a way that they are able to express themselves in legislation.

With modifications, the Board went along with them, politically threading the needle between fully placating Hall and the anti-vaxxers and doing no harm to hospitals and the considerable healthcare establishment of the county.

The most important result of passage of the package was that the ability of doctors and hospital administrators to protect the public was not infringed. While the resolution establishes that patients should be allowed to leave hospitals on their own initiative, even if sick and infectious, hospitals and doctors are not legally required to do so, since that “right” is mentioned only in the resolution. Hospitals can also still restrict patient visitation if necessary, although this is also discouraged in the resolution, but it does not have the force of law.

Nonetheless, the most important substantive change in the ordinance was the raising of the bar for approval of vaccine mandates, documentation and treatment of Collier County employees.

In 2020, the Board by a simple 3 to 2 majority established a mask mandate to protect Collier County residents. Hall and his allies sought to require a unanimous vote to do the same thing in the future. However, the Board took a middle path, requiring a supermajority or 4 to 1vote to establish any future mandates (which would depend on changes to state law anyway).

From a practical, immediate, political standpoint, the move to a supermajority deprives Hall of a veto on future mandates. If a situation arises that requires a mandate of some kind, Hall, a MAGA anti-mandate Republican, is likely to reject any mandatory health measures on principle. However, he—or any other commissioner—can now be overcome by a supermajority of the Board. It’s a tougher standard than previously but still allows for a degree of flexibility.

Rejecting the world

Both the ordinance and the resolution reflect a profound and willful ignorance of the role of the World Health Organization, an agency of the United Nations.

WHO is an advisory and advocacy organization. It collects health and infectious disease data from all over the world, analyzes it and issues recommendations based on its conclusions. It has no direct authority anywhere in the world. It cannot make anyone do anything.

It was WHO that declared COVID a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, citing the disease’s alarming spread outside of China and recommending that governments take aggressive action to stop it.

(A note on terminology: To this day there remains confusion about the differences between the words “endemic,” “epidemic” and “pandemic.” All are based on the Greek word “demos,” meaning “people.” “Endemic” means that a disease or condition is “in” the people, like seasonal colds or the annual flu. “Epi” is Greek for “on” and an “epidemic” means a disease is “on the people,” like a localized outbreak. “Pan” is Greek for “all” and indicates that a disease is present in every country in the world. The words describe the extent of a disease, not its severity.)

WHO was extremely careful before officially declaring COVID a pandemic and did it only when the data confirmed its wild and uncontrollable spread in every country—until vaccines halted that spread.

Even though WHO had no authority anywhere in the United States to compel anyone to do anything, anti-vaxxers and COVID-deniers felt that it did because of the respect with which its recommendations were regarded in the media and among medical professionals. In this they largely reflected the biases of President Donald Trump during his term in office when he largely rejected advice and sound practice based on scientific evidence and credible data.

The resolution rejects any international intrusion into Collier County, which international bodies had no power to do anyway. It reflects isolationism in its purest form.

Facing the future

The world has endured two extremely deadly pandemics since 1900: the global influenza of 1918 and the COVID outbreak of 2019. If this pattern holds, the next pandemic could come in 2118 or 2119—or not. It might never happen or it could arrive tomorrow.

Collier County suffered during the COVID pandemic. Estimates of COVID deaths in Collier County range from 551 to 1,175 people. According to the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center, an estimated 86,850 people died in Florida. Some 1,125,366 people are estimated to have died in the United States, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The World Health Organization estimates that COVID took 6,887,000 people worldwide.

When—not if, when—there’s a new outbreak, Florida will be extremely vulnerable and may face many more deaths than elsewhere, not only in the country but in the world. Its governor chose to ride resentment of unpopular COVID health precautions to re-election in 2022 and he is doing everything he can to minimize public health precautions for the future. He is betting on the notion that the dead don’t vote and the living forget the dead.

Florida will have fewer protections, procedures and mechanisms in place the next time it confronts an infectious disease and its hospitals and medical professionals will face greater legal obstacles and hindrances in saving lives and protecting its citizens.

It is rare that societies, having experienced trauma and loss, choose to step backward in time and make themselves weaker and more vulnerable. With its fulminations against public health protections, science, outside authority and global coordination, the Collier County ordinance and resolution represent a step backward.

Fortunately, in this instance, cooler heads minimized the damage these measures sought to do.

With thanks ro Lisa Freund for her reporting..

Follow this link to read the full text of the Collier County ordinance.

Follow this link to read the full text of the Collier County resolution.

A video of the entire April 11 Board of Commissioners meeting can be viewed here.

The full text of the initial versions of the ordinance and resolution are included here.

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Fascism in Florida? ‘Blood and Power’ provides perspective

The visage of Benito Mussolini glowers down from Fascist Party headquarters in Rome in 1934 against a backdrop urging a ‘si’ or yes vote in a referendum. (Photo: Scientific American)

April 17, 2023 by David Silverberg

“Fascism” is a term thrown around a lot these days, especially in Florida.

However, are the kinds of repressive, extreme and anti-democratic measures being proposed and imposed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and the Florida legislature actual Fascism, as their critics charge? Is the rise of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) right in America actually fascism as the ideology and movement have historically been defined?

To answer those questions, one has to reach back into history to Fascism’s origins and evolution.

In America, Nazi Germany has always defined the image of fascism in the popular imagination. However, it was in Italy immediately after World War I that the name “fascism” was used for the first time, Fascism first developed as a political movement, and fascists seized government power.

Fortunately, there’s a recently published book on exactly that subject: Blood and Power: The Rise and Fall of Italian Fascism.

(A note on style: This article follows both the Associated Press and the Chicago Manual of Style, which hold that nouns and adjectives designating political and economic systems of thought are lowercased, like fascism and socialism, as opposed to the names of political parties like the National Fascist Party, or formally titled movements like Nazi or Fascist.)

Published in September 2022 by Bloomsbury Publishing in London, Blood and Power is by English historian John Foot, a professor of modern Italian history at the University of Bristol. Foot has written extensively on topics of Italian history and knows this subject thoroughly.

Violence from the start

“Italy invented fascism,” Foot writes in his prologue, and from its beginning at two little-noticed meetings in Milan in March 1919, fascism was violent.

“Fascists embraced violence, both in their language and on the streets. At first, they were overshadowed by a socialist uprising where revolution seemed inevitable during the ‘two red years’—biennio rosso—of 1919-20. But soon, groups of fascists, known as squads, dressed in black, were on the march in the countryside and cities of Italy, destroying a powerful union movement, crushing democracy and spreading fear through the country; 1921-22 were the ‘two black years’—the biennio nero.”

In 1922 the fascist squadristi marched on Rome. Their leader, former socialist Benito Mussolini, was named prime minister when the king of Italy and the government caved in to their demands.

“Having taken power through murderous violence, Italian fascism held onto it through further bloodshed and occupation of the state. In power, fascism eliminated all vestiges of free speech,” Foot writes. Further, fascism “eliminated its opponents with gusto or reduced them to a state of fear. It also rewrote its own history, painting the fascist movement as a glorious defender of the fatherland as a revolutionary and modernizing force, but also as a return to order. Fascism was built on a mound of dead bodies, cracked heads, traumatized victims of violence, burnt books and smashed up cooperatives and union headquarters. Most of those who ended up governing Italy had committed crimes for which they were rarely investigated, let alone tried.”

Foot acknowledges that “There has been considerable historical debate about the meaning of Italian fascism.” He asks: was it forward-looking or backward-looking? (Or put in a modern American context, did it aim to “make Italy great again?”)

Foot’s answer: “Italian fascism looked forwards and backwards.” It built both radically modernist structures and neo-classical throwbacks, both daring art and unimaginative tributes to Il Duce, Mussolini’s title. “It understood the power of the media and advertising, but it also glanced back longingly to a rural Italy that was fast disappearing. It was at times radical, but also radically reactionary, and often simply pragmatic. It claimed to be anti-system and anti-political, but most of its leading proponents were corrupt, and enriched themselves. These contradictions were also its strengths.”

In this history Foot emphasizes the ground-level violence that fascists employed against their opponents and competitors—and against democracy and its mechanisms. American histories of the era often overlook the street brawls, maulings and fights that accompanied fascism’s rise. They’re summarized in a word or paragraph, whether they took place in Italy or Germany.

Foot, however, is at pains to show that violence was integral to fascism. “Without violence, both before and during the regime, fascism would never have come close to power. It was fundamental, visceral, epochal and life-changing: both for those who experienced it, and those who practiced it.”

The same reliance on street-level violence in the onset of German fascism has been referenced in numerous accounts of the rise of Nazism.

What Foot documents very well was the relentless, violent hammering at all the institutions and aspects of democracy by Italian fascists. Whether in town or provincial councils or the national parliament, fascists attacked the mechanics of parliamentary process and procedure, as well as those who were trying to maintain it. Time after time they stopped government at all levels from functioning, whether by disrupting parliamentary proceedings or beating or killing those who administered it.

This reliance on violence was partially driven by the fact that Fascists were in the electoral minority. Socialism was very popular in Italy after the First World War and socialists were often democratically voted into office. Fascists had to smash democracy to impose their will on the population.

In Bologna in 1920 fascists succeeded in forcing the dissolution of an elected city government through terrorism in the streets and an assassination in the city council chamber. To this day it’s unclear whether they deliberately killed one of their own councilors. Regardless, they used Bologna as a model and went on to destroy local democratic governments throughout Italy, culminating in their march on Rome two years later and takeover of the nation.

There was strong, often equally violent resistance to this effort. But the decisive change came when the instruments of the state, the police, the Carabinieri and Royal Guards either stood by or joined the fascists. Fascists gradually grew confident that they wouldn’t be prosecuted or jailed for their crimes or else they could intimidate or dominate the forces of law enforcement and the judicial system.

With both the cudgels and daggers of the squadristi and the authorities of the state arrayed against it, democracy was gradually ground into dust. It simply couldn’t function in such an atmosphere and those who believed in it failed or were unable to take the kind of action necessary to preserve it.

John Foot (Photo: University of Bristol)

Recognizing fascism

It would be much easier to oppose fascism if there was a single, definitive expression of its meaning and beliefs, the way there is with the Communist Manifesto.

Mussolini had been a journalist and an editor but perhaps because he didn’t serve a jail term as fascist leader he never collected and organized his beliefs into a single document. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf was so peculiar to Germany that it couldn’t really serve as a template elsewhere, although it succeeded in conveying his racism and anti-Semitism to the world and layed out a blueprint for German conquest.

As a result, today in America it’s difficult to recognize Fascism as a formal movement. Its adherents don’t march waving little black books the way Chinese communists waved red-colored copies of Mao Zedong’s sayings. Even the neo-Nazis and racists who demonstrated and rioted in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017 did not formally call themselves Fascists.

Nonetheless, Americans will clearly recognize themes, beliefs and practices that hearken back to the classic fascism of Mussolini and Hitler.

Foot is well aware of these patterns and points them out in his epilogue.

“More recently, Donald Trump has often been compared to Mussolini,” he writes. “His speaking style…his policies (nationalism, racism, autarchy, a corporate state, a distaste for democracy itself)—have led to associations with Il Duce.”

He continues: “Democracy does not last forever. Indeed, it is often extremely fragile. Italian fascism showed how democracy, and its institutions, can quickly crumble in the face of violence, disaffection and rage. Some of this was seen in the USA after 2016, and not just in the armed attack on the Capitol in January 2021. When the ‘forces of law and order’ are also on board, things can quickly disintegrate. Collusion between parts of the state and the fascists was a key factor in Mussolini’s victory.”

Lastly, he warns: “Fascism’s historic attempt to ‘deliberately…transform its lies into reality’ certainly chimes with much of what is happening today on the far right, and more widely on social media. Fascism will not return in the same form yet may still make a comeback in some way. It could be argued that this might have already happened in different times and various places.”

Fascism and Florida

Today Florida is the laboratory for an American anti-democratic experiment. A former president in residence, a radical right governor and an extremist legislature are following unmistakable paths that were plowed almost exactly a century ago in tumultuous Italy.

One of these is the attack on the autonomy of local governments. (“In push to the right, Florida cities and counties become focus for DeSantis and lawmakers,” Tallahassee Democrat, Feb. 17, 2023.)

Another is the effort to muzzle the press. (“DeSantis, GOP lawmakers pursue bill to gut press freedom,” Miami Herald, Feb. 25, 2023.)

A third is the effort to constrict and restrict the vote. (“DeSantis signs additional voting restrictions into law before cheering crowd,” Florida Phoenix, April 25, 2022.)

A fourth is the assault on freedom of thought in schools and universities. (“FL Governor DeSantis’ proposals on higher education pose a grave threat to academic freedom and free speech at public colleges and universities,” PEN America, Feb. 2, 2023.)

A fifth is the attempt by the governor to create his own military force answerable only to himself. (“DeSantis seeks $98 million to fund Florida’s own military,” Click Orlando, March 9, 2023.)

In the legislature, state Sen. Blaize Ingoglia (R-11-Citrus, Hernando and Sumter counties) is attempting to outlaw the Democratic Party in Florida through “The Ultimate Cancel Act” (SB 1248). This is clearly an effort to create a one-party state of the kind that Mussolini and Hitler established in Italy and Germany.

Ingoglia may want Florida to be a one-party state but in fact his own party is facing its own two distinct anti-democratic movements built around their leaders.

Trumpism, which centers on former President Donald Trump, is not only threatening for its fascistic tendencies, but more closely resembles classic fascism in its propensity for violence. After all, Trump encouraged violence throughout his 2016 presidential campaign, during his term in office and then incited the insurrection and assault on the US Capitol and Congress on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump directly attempted to overthrow the duly elected national government and negate a free and fair election. It was a leaf not only out of the fascist playbook, it mirrored what Mussolini and the fascists did in Italy.

What might be called DeSantism (or Florida+Fascism=”Flascism”?) has not expressed itself in violence—yet. Nonetheless, DeSantis’ war on what he calls “woke” clearly follows classic fascist strategies. As mentioned above, these include: reducing local autonomy, muzzling or intimidating the press, restricting the vote, and assaulting freedom of speech and thought. Add to this mix his anti-competitive gerrymandering of election districts, his dominance of a wide variety of boards and panels and his bullying of private enterprises like the Disney Corp., for their ideological dissent.

It’s worth remembering that both Italian and German fascist movements represented themselves as revolutionary resistance efforts against what they saw as looming threats. They focused on specific causes for their countries’ plights and they targeted scapegoats on which all blame could be heaped. In the early 1920s in Italy the threat was Bolshevism, the plight was Italy’s “mutilated peace” and the scapegoats were Socialists. In Germany, the threat was Communism, the plight was the Versailles Treaty, and the scapegoats were Jews.

For Donald Trump the threat is “radical, leftist Democrats,” the plight is a supposedly stolen election and among his many scapegoats is billionaire George Soros. For DeSantis the threat is a “woke mob,” the plight is liberal “woke” ideology and the scapegoat is the media—and also, George Soros.

The specifics may be different but the patterns are the same. Only a century separates them.

But it would be remiss not to note the differences.

American carnage

When Fascism arose in Europe it was at the end of a world war. Both Italians and Germans felt defeated, dissatisfied and humiliated. Russia had fallen to Bolshevism and a militant communist movement appeared ready to dominate the world through revolutionary violence. Both countries had millions of demobilized men with military training, accustomed to military regimentation and were looking for causes transcending themselves. Fascism provided an outlet for their energies and experience and a focus for their rage.

America in 2016 presented a very different picture. It was wealthy and confident. It was the dominant power in the world. Its culture and the rules it had established with its allies ever since World War II governed global trade and diplomacy. Its chief opponents, the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact, were gone and their successors sought Western acceptance. Communism was dead as an active force. American forces had captured and killed Osama bin Laden and largely destroyed the terrorist jihadist threat from abroad. America was stable politically, economically and socially. Its population was largely united on the fundamentals of its Constitution, laws and believed in its mission in the world. And it was the world’s oldest, continuously functioning democracy, the value of which was unchallenged.

Running against this reality, Donald Trump had no chance of winning the presidency. To pose as America’s savior, he had to create American carnage first. He had to create a situation of dissatisfaction and disorder and so he conjured up phantom dangers, conspiracies, plights, grievances and scapegoats. He exaggerated the threat from his political opponents, painting them as treasonous, dangerous and monstrous. He worked to destroy a moderate, middle political ground, dividing Americans into absolute loyalists or absolute enemies. He and his allies, who included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Fox News, spun an unreality that was the polar opposite of the true state of affairs and then tried to impose it on an otherwise moderate populace.

In 2016 the majority of Americans rejected Trump and Trumpism, delivering 48 percent of their votes to Hillary Clinton compared to Trump’s 46 percent, a difference of 2.9 million ballots. However, with razor-thin margins in key Electoral College states and Russian help, Trump gained the presidency and America has been crippled ever since.

For DeSantis, the chosen path to power was to conjure a “woke” threat that made simple open-mindedness, free thought, an obscure academic theory and social tolerance into an apocalyptic phantasmal “woke” peril of grooming, racism and coercion.

Now this battle is continuing in Florida as Trump and DeSantis compete for the Republican Party presidential nomination, the White House and ultimately, control of the nation. The state of Florida has the misfortune to be their initial battleground. Trump is using his national platform to spread Trumpism throughout Florida and beyond; DeSantis is promoting DeSantism and imposing its precepts on the state through his power as governor, while openly hoping to propagate it nationwide.

Analysis: The verdict

So is Florida a fascist state?

Perhaps at this point it might be most accurate to label it as “fascistic” rather than overtly Fascist.

Florida cannot simply be labeled Fascist because it does not have a registered Fascist Party by that name. It is not seeing the kind of pervasive political violence that accompanied the rise of European fascism. While Trump is still advocating violence (warning of “potential death & destruction” if he was arrested), DeSantis is not, nor is political violence evident in everyday life. There are still multiple legal political parties, although this is threatened in the legislature. Laws still govern, although their authority is becoming shaky as is the application of national laws and the Constitution. (e.g., “DeSantis: Florida won’t cooperate with Trump extradition.”).

That said, there are strong currents propelling the state in a fascistic direction, as detailed above.

But the triumph of fascism in Florida is no more assured than it was at its outset in Italy or Germany.

The strongest defense against fascism is simply the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, which when actively applied prevents the kind of oppression imposed by fascism.

One potential countervailing force is an active and vigorous effort to preserve democracy at the grassroots. This means protecting parliamentary democracy at the city and county level and even in local school boards. Key to this is defending the voting franchise for all eligible citizens and encouraging active participation. It is especially important that the public preserve its right to petition government for a redress of grievances and to freely express opinions to lawmakers, a right already threatened in Florida at the state and local levels. (“Just 30 seconds? Despite complex bills, Floridians are limited on public testimony in Legislature,” Florida Phoenix, March 14, 2023.)

Simply ensuring that elections are free, fair and their results counted accurately and without impediment or interference by impartial, non-partisan, professional election supervisors, is another defense. This is threatened by DeSantis’ special “election police” who have the potential to negate election results he doesn’t like and by MAGA attempts to dominate election of supervisors at the local level.

Another defense is ensuring that candidates commit in advance of their elections to accepting the tabulated results and a willingness to concede if they lose. At every debate and in every press conference, candidates should be pressed to state that they will accept the official results. Trump’s fantasies of a stolen election and his refusal to accept defeat has been incredibly damaging to the United States and it spawned imitators like Arizona’s Kari Lake. Candidates need to be clear and unambiguous that they will accept election results without qualifications or caveats, otherwise they should be condemned and disqualified.

But asking firm questions and holding candidates to the results requires a free and independent press. That is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution. The danger of an independent and inquiring press to fascism was fully recognized by Mussolini and Hitler and they did all they could to suppress it. Russian President Vladimir Putin also recognizes the threat that truth and real information pose—as does Trump and DeSantis and extremist Florida legislators as they hammer away at press freedoms.

But perhaps the single most important defense of democracy against fascist encroachment lies in a neutral, impartial police and the equal and vigorous application of law to all citizens regardless of status or stature.

As Foot shows in Blood and Power, once the state authorities entrusted with the tools of coercion and force stood by or joined the fascists, the game was over. This was also true in Germany. When the forces of the state stood firm against Hitler and his Nazis in 1923 when they attempted a putsch, the Nazis were stopped in their tracks and law prevailed. When the Nazis took state power in 1933 and directed Germany’s civil authorities to enforce Nazi doctrine with criminal penalties, Germany became a completely tyrannical state.

This is why exceptions cannot be made in charging a political figure like Trump for any criminal acts he may have committed, whether in office or not. He cannot be granted immunity just because he wants it and those who argue that he deserves it are aiding and abetting fascism, whether they know it or not. There is a large contingent in Florida making exactly that case—but would these people have argued that Mussolini shouldn’t have been held accountable for his crimes? Or Hitler? The case is the same.

But apolitical law enforcement is also essential at the local level, perhaps even more so. When Sheriff Grady Judd of Polk County, Florida tells potential Floridians: “So we only want to share one thing as you move in hundreds a day. Welcome to Florida. But don’t register to vote and vote the stupid way you did up north, or you’ll get what they got,” that is a fascistic threat. When Sheriff Kevin Rambosk of Collier County endorses a “Bill of Rights Sanctuary” ordinance that seeks to nullify federal law in his jurisdiction, that erodes democracy at the grassroots.

There is no doubt that fascism had its attractions a century ago and still has them today. But America, like no other country, committed to democracy at its founding and defended it repeatedly over the past two centuries.

As Foot notes in Blood and Power, “Democracy does not last forever. Indeed, it is often extremely fragile. Italian fascism showed how democracy, and its institutions, can quickly crumble in the face of violence, disaffection and rage.”

But one might also respond that democracy and its institutions can stand firm, strong and resilient when its defenders are aware, united and determined.

And in Florida, even if its government is trending fascistic today, that does not mean it has to be Fascist tomorrow.

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

An open letter to Collier County Commissioners, opposing anti-health measures and favoring a COVID memorial

The Collier County Board of Commissioners considers an anti-health ordinance and resolution at its March 28 meeting. (Image: CCBC)

April 10, 2023 by David Silverberg

Honorable Commissioners:

I am writing to address the misleadingly titled “Collier County Health Freedom Bill of Rights Ordinance” and the “Collier County Health Freedom Resolution” that you are scheduled to consider tomorrow as agenda item 10A.

I very much regret that it appears I cannot be there to speak in person, so this message, which I am also publicly posting online, will have to do.

The objections I expressed to the ordinance at your March 28 meeting have not changed: the ordinance is redundant of state law; it is unnecessarily time consuming; it is unnecessarily expensive; it is unnecessarily divisive; it interferes with the professional and scientific administration of medical measures both individual and for the public as a whole; it is likely to be challenged on constitutional grounds and the county will have to bear the costs of any litigation defending it. Also, it will impede public health measures in the event of another emergency. Lives will be lost because of it.

Additionally, both the ordinance and the resolution, as last drafted, contain significant errors of fact and perception.

As Commissioners McDaniel and LoCastro pointed out at the last meeting, the draft resolution submitted then was angry, accusatory, conjectural and even violent in its language.

Neither the ordinance nor the resolution are worthy of approval and implementation in Collier County. They both should be rejected unanimously by the Board. Alternatively, as Dr. Michael Finkel has suggested, the ordinance could be submitted to a full referendum by the voters in next year’s general election.

Far more appropriate and constructive would be a memorial honoring the efforts of Collier County’s medical and healthcare professionals. They served and protected the county during the worst ravages of the COVID pandemic. Nor should the victims of COVID be forgotten. I elaborated on this in my message of April 2nd and posting of April 3rd.

At the very least Collier County should honor these professionals and victims with a resolution and proclamation expressing the county’s gratitude for their efforts and memorializing their passing and I urge you to pass such a measure.

Once again, I strongly urge you to reject this proposed ordinance and resolution. By doing so, you will be protecting the health of Collier County’s residents and maintaining its reputation in Florida and the world as a welcoming place of reason, rationality and common sense.

Liberty lives in light

©2023 by David Silverberg