Facing the storm: The impact of Trump-Musk decisions on Southwest Florida

Southwest Florida Trump supporters celebrate his inauguration on Jan. 20. (Image: WINK News)

March 7, 2025 by David Silverberg

On Jan. 6, 2021, a rampaging mob incited by President Donald Trump defiled and vandalized the Capitol of the United States in what even Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.) called at the time, “a warped display of so-called patriotism.”

Beginning on Jan. 20, 2025, the regime led by President Donald Trump began attacking and destroying the government of the United States in a no-less destructive series of executive orders and mass firings.

In his second inaugural address Trump declared that “From this moment on, America’s decline is over” but as with so many of his deceptions and delusions exactly the opposite is true. Under Trump, America isn’t declining, it’s plunging into isolation, ignorance and impotence.

Politically, Southwest Florida is heavily Trumpist. It was long a conservative bastion, whether segregationist Democratic or post-Richard Nixon “southern strategy” Republican. With Trump’s candidacy in 2016 it largely became a pro-Trump, Make America Great Again (MAGA) bastion. His victory and inauguration was celebrated and hailed locally, especially in Collier County.

As part of its political orientation, Southwest Florida has long been hostile to the federal government, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2022. Collier County passed a federal nullification ordinance in 2023. The federal government was regarded as a hostile entity by local activists like Francis Alfred “Alfie” Oakes III and Keith Flaugh and their supporters.

With Trump now dominant, unchecked and unbalanced by Congress or any other institution, with billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) rampaging through federal agencies, and with the much-hated federal government being dismantled, what can Southwest Floridians expect from the Trump policy agenda? What will be the impact on them and their region? How will people feel Trumpism in their personal lives?

Social Security uncertainty

A homeless encampment in Fort Myers under the Matanzas Pass bridge in 2023 in the wake of Hurricane Ian. Homelessness is likely to rise in Southwest Florida if Social Security and other safety net programs are cut or terminated. (Photo: WGCU/Mike Walcher)

Social Security is clearly at risk.

In the past Trump has promised not to touch Social Security—but the same cannot be said for the Social Security Administration (SSA), which administers the program. There, Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has reportedly targeted at least 7,000 jobs for elimination. These are the people who make sure the checks go out on time, who help recipients with difficulties and clear procedural problems.

Musk has called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time” and accused it of being rife with fraud.

In his March 4 State of the Union address, Trump also alleged waste, stating that “Believe it or not, government databases list 4.7 million Social Security members from people aged 100 to 109 years old”—which prompted shouts of “No!” and “It’s false! False!” from members of Congress. In his very next sentence, Trump altered the numbers: “It lists 3.6 million people from ages 110 to 119. I don’t know any of them. I know some people that are rather elderly but not quite that elderly.”

That too was incorrect. According to the Social Security Administration, only 89,106 recipients older than 100 years were listed on Social Security rolls as of December 2024. Leland Dudek, the acting commissioner, said in February that the raw numbers did not reflect actual benefits being paid.

“The reported data are people in our records with a Social Security number who do not have a date of death associated with their record. These individuals are not necessarily receiving benefits,” Dudek clarified.

When it comes to Southwest Florida, according to 2023 figures from the Social Security Office of Retirement and Disability Policy, there were 3,780 Social Security recipients in Collier County, 11,937 in Lee County and 2,779 in Charlotte County. Overall, there were 539,276 Social Security beneficiaries in Florida, the second largest number in the country, after California.

(Editor’s note: The 2023 figures may be the last credible figures available, given cuts to the Social Security workforce and removal of publicly available data across the federal government.)

Social Security doesn’t just provide a steady, reliable income for those who paid into it all their working lives, it helps fuel the local economy.

Any cuts to the benefits will be devastating for fixed-income recipients who depend on the program and will likely have a significant impact on the businesses and services they use, not to mention equally devastating blows to Medicare, Medicaid and other safety net social programs that are being considered for DOGEing.

Beyond that, the regime’s official hostility toward vaccinations and public health measures both at the federal and state levels means that Southwest Floridians will be vulnerable to epidemics and diseases previously rendered non-threatening. Already, one case of measles has been reported in a Florida high school. In Texas the number is 158, with one death.

Thanks to these policies and actions, Southwest Floridians will be both poorer and sicker.

Prices, tariffs and international isolation

President Joe Biden, along with the independent efforts of the Federal Reserve, managed to lower the inflation rate from 7.5 percent as of January 2022 to 2.9 percent by the end of his term in December 2024, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The inflation rate under President Joe Biden from January 2022 to December 2024. (Chart: US Bureau of Labor statistics [click link for full interactive chart and data])

Trump’s economic isolationist policies will undoubtedly drive up prices of all goods and services across the board—this is Kindergarten Economics 101. Completely unnecessary and unprovoked trade wars with America’s biggest trading partners, Canada, Mexico and China, will effectively impose a tax on everything that Americans buy, especially big-ticket items like cars and appliances.

Southwest Florida stands to be hit hard by Trump’s inflation: prices for foodstuffs like tomatoes and common items like imported beer from Mexico will rise, not to mention big ticket items like cars and car parts and anything made of steel and aluminum.

Southwest Florida will also be particularly hard hit by Trump’s economic and verbal attacks on Canada, which was a source of 15 percent of Collier County’s tourism. In 2024, 119,000 Canadian visitors came to Collier County, according to the Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention & Visitors Bureau.

Canadians also accounted for 5 percent of Lee County’s tourism in April and June of last year. Statewide, Visit Florida, the state’s tourism bureau, estimated that over 3.2 million Canadians visited Florida in 2024, making up 27 percent of all international travelers

“Canadians are hurt. Canadians are angry. We are going to choose to not go on vacation in Florida,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in a press conference on Tuesday, March 4, when US tariffs kicked in. “We are going to choose to try and buy Canadian products … and yeah we’re probably going to keep booing the American anthem.”

Unusually, Trudeau addressed Trump directly: “I want to speak directly to one specific American, Donald,” Trudeau said. “It’s not in my habit to agree with the Wall Street Journal, but Donald, they point out that even though you’re a very smart guy, this is a very dumb thing to do.”

When it comes to America’s southern trading partner, Mexico provides considerable produce for Florida consumers including tomatoes, avocados and strawberries. As importantly, it and other Latin American countries have been a major source of cheap labor, whether documented or undocumented, for Florida’s construction, hospitality and agricultural industries, especially in the Southwest region.

But Trump has been at war with Mexican migrants since his very first candidate press conference in 2015 when he called them “criminals” and “rapists.”

Now Trump’s hatred, prejudice and rage against migrants is official US policy and that goes double for Florida where the governor and legislature are competing with each other to enact ever more restrictive and punitive measures.

The effort is ostensibly aimed against undocumented migrants, who have gone from being regarded as people seeking a better life and a source of cheap labor to a criminal invasion that threatens the country. But the hostility to immigrants whatever their status, particularly those from Latin and South America, is unmistakable.

An interesting example of this is a television advertisement from Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem that just began running in Florida markets, promising to hunt down undocumented migrants, urging the rest to self-deport, extravagantly praising Trump and ending with the lines “America welcomes those who respect our laws” while closing with an image of a 34-count convicted felon.

The ultimate end of these efforts appears to be to make Florida the most anti-immigrant state in the nation.

Immigration raids are ongoing in Southwest Florida as they are throughout the country, including possible targets in schools, churches and hospitals. Their net effect for Southwest Florida residents, in addition to the potential for their neighbors and employees to suddenly be deported, will be another force driving up prices, depressing the local economy and eroding the quality of life and availability of all goods and services.

DOGE destruction: FEMA and NOAA

Debris lines a street in Naples, Fla., following Hurricane Ian in 2022. (Photo: Author)

Both the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were targeted by Project 2025, the conservative governing blueprint. These are two agencies are of particular importance to Southwest Florida given its vulnerability to weather, climate change, hurricanes and harmful algal blooms.

DOGE has already fired 500 people from the National Weather Service, an office of NOAA, and another round of 800 layoffs is expected. This means there will be that much less capability for forecasting and warnings of dangerous storms. Even the famous Hurricane Hunters, the heroic pilots and crews who fly into storms to gather crucial data, are not immune. It’s unclear whether there will be any Hurricane Hunter aircraft flying in the future.

This will leave Southwest Floridians with less time to prepare in the event of severe weather and will probably make forecasts less precise, affecting evacuation decisions and endangering the public. It reverses 155 years of steady scientific meteorological progress ever since the US government first started monitoring the weather in 1870.

After a storm comes through, FEMA is likely to have less capacity to help victims and survivors, depending how its budgeting and management emerge from the current shakeup.

One dramatic way that people in Southwest Florida will see this on the ground is in debris removal after a major storm. Instead of several months of inconvenience, debris will now be more likely to linger for years, proving a health and navigation hazard.

After Hurricane Ian in 2022, the Lee County government put the estimated cost of Hurricane Ian in the county at $297.3 million. Over half of this was for debris removal, whose cost came to $156.3 million. Much of that was covered by FEMA funding.

In the future, given likely cuts to disaster assistance, money won’t be there and the debris will linger as counties and municipalities struggle to cope with storms’ aftermaths.

It needs to be noted that Donalds, whose district covers coastal Southwest Florida from Cape Coral to Marco Island, has consistently voted against appropriations bills that would replenish FEMA funding. Moreover, he is now running for governor on a Trump-endorsed platform, so in the event of disasters between now and the 2026 election he cannot be expected to assist affected communities and seek aid from an eviscerated FEMA and a hostile regime.

In all, Southwest Florida will be on its own, before, during and after any storms.

Gulf of Mexico: Exploitation and degradation

Offshore oil platforms and vessels. (Photo: USCG)

Trump’s announcement on Jan. 7 that he was renaming the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America” proved a major distraction—as intended. But it masked a much more serious threat to the body of water and the communities on its shoreline, in particular those of Southwest Florida.

When, as a candidate, Trump was pressed about the possibility of being dictator, he responded that he would be a dictator on day one so he could implement a policy of “drill, baby, drill.”

That day has passed and indeed, the protections Southwest Floridians enjoyed against coastal oil exploration and exploitation on their shores are gone.

On his first day in office Trump declared a national energy emergency and revoked a large number of previous executive orders and memoranda issued by President Joe Biden. Among these were executive actions protecting areas from offshore drilling, including off the coast of Florida. The Trump actions were challenged in court and as of this writing await final disposition.

However, the possibility is much higher now that when Southwest Floridians go to the beach in the future they could be met by a vista of derricks, drilling platforms, ship traffic and wade into water polluted with spills, chemicals and oil debris.

Education and the descent into ignorance

The Collier County School Board building. (Photo: CCPS)

On Monday, March 3, the US Senate voted to confirm Linda McMahon, a former chief executive officer of World Wrestling Entertainment, as Secretary of Education. On Thursday, March 6, The Washington Post reported that Trump was going to issue an executive order calling on McMahon to “take all necessary steps” to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education “to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.”

The Department of Education, created by President Jimmy Carter, has long been a conservative, Republican target.

The closure of the department, whose primary mission is to distribute federal education grants, will negatively impact local school districts. Nationwide, public spending on kindergarten through 12th grade education totals $857.2 billion of which the federal government provides 13.6 percent.

This reaches down to every school and school district. In Southwest Florida, for example, in its tentative 2024-25 budget released last July 31, the Collier County School District estimated it would receive $7,243,150 in direct federal funding and nearly $80 million in federal funding passed on through the state. This money goes for everything from school lunches, to salaries, to supplies, to services, to furniture and more. Lee County is expecting $87,879,653 in federal funds during the 2024 to 2025 fiscal school year both directly and through the state.

The uncertainty and unpredictability of federal education funding under Trump-McMahon will make it nearly impossible for local school districts to reliably and credibly budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal school year. They cannot even budget based on previous fiscal years or hold spending steady, since the past can no longer be a guide to future funding.

What is more, if the funds are cut off altogether, as seems likely, every school district in the country will be impacted. The big losers here are the students, who will lose everything from teaching materials to facilities, and the country itself, which will become less educated, less capable and less informed.

Once again, no comfort or assistance should be expected from Southwest Florida’s congressional representative, Byron Donalds, who, along with his wife has been a longtime critic of public education and proponent of non-public alternatives. As a Trump-endorsed candidate for governor, it is unlikely that he will go against Trump’s decrees and argue the case for funding state and local public schools in Congress when the ax falls.

Commentary: Barbarians through the gates

In the year 455 of the Common Era, a barbarian tribe known as the Vandals sacked the city of Rome. They occupied it for two weeks and during that time their wanton, random, mindless destructiveness gave rise to the word “vandalism.”

Currently, it is as though the tag team of Trump and Musk is trying to replay the sack of Rome in Washington, DC, complete with ruin and barbarity. Trump is driven by hatred and a desire for revenge and Musk is pursuing an elusive and undefined “efficiency” that thoughtlessly changes daily based on his whims. They are making big decisions on the basis of stereotypes, assumptions and emotions that make them feel strong or outraged rather than dispassionate examination of a complicated reality. And they are acting without regard to law, due process or constitutional restraints.

Together they are carelessly upending the 249 years of painstaking thought and effort that built the United States and the federal system that governs it. This essay hasn’t even scratched the surface of the damage they are doing economically, internationally or scientifically, affecting health, safety, research, military strength, homeland security, law enforcement and every other area of life and civilization involving the United States government. The ultimate victims are the American people and the United States itself.

Those Southwest Floridians who still support Trump and his regime for emotional or sentimental reasons should know that they will not be immune or protected or untouched by the tempest out of the Oval Office. It’s coming to Southwest Florida as surely as any hurricane barreling in from the Gulf of Mexico. They’re going to get wet too.

There is a rising opposition to this in Southwest Florida, as people begin to demonstrate and protest. Perhaps the same spirit that led Ukraine to fight Russia’s aggression—and motivated American patriots to oppose a distant king’s tyranny nearly 250 years ago—can help contain some of the damage from the human-caused storm that’s already breaking on Southwest Florida’s sunny shores.

A building destroyed by Hurricane Ian on Fort Myers Beach, Fla., four months after the storm came ashore in September 2022. (Photo: Author)

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Can John Morgan launch a real political party in Florida?

John Morgan discusses his plans to create a new political party in Florida with Dave Elias, political reporter for Gulf Coast News on Feb. 28. (Image: Gulf Coast News)

March 1, 2025 by David Silverberg

John Morgan, the personal injury lawyer of Florida’s incessant and ubiquitous television advertisements, has announced that he is forming a new political party.

As of this writing there are not a lot of details. Morgan announced the new party in a series of X postings.

Here is the sequence, which began at 4:35 pm on Wednesday, Feb. 26. They provide as much detail as Morgan has chosen to make public to date. (Punctuation as posted.)

4:35 PM · Feb 26, 2025:

I am forming a new political party for those of us stuck in the middle.

Our two party system is broken due to Gerrymandering and divisive issues… both sides.

No labels is not an option. Everyone wants a team or tribe.

Ron Myers is my lawyer drafting the paperwork. Stay tuned. #ForThePeople

7:04 AM · Feb 27, 2025:

I need 4 people to file my paperwork. Phil Levine is in… What about you Rod Smith and John McKay? This is ecumenical…

7:45 AM · Feb 27, 2025:

This party is not for “me” necessarily… it’s for “us”

Both parties have things I like. But what I don’t like is that everything is a bloodsport. It’s all or nothing. Compromise is a dirty word and civility has been abandoned.

The last time America was together was right after 9/11. And I liked that feel. Just like the greatest generation in WW2.

People… we are all on the same fucking team. I didn’t vote for Trump but I’m pulling like hell for Trump. I didn’t vote for Kamala either btw. It’s time for a third choice. If the choice is only vanilla or chocolate… you never get to eat strawberry.

Life is like a box of chocolates.

8:15 AM · Feb 27, 2025

What I have learned with my constitutional amendments and others… is that when an issue is not associated with a party most of us agree on most things.

– Marijuana

– Minimum Wage

– Felons rights

– Fair districts But special interests own the politicians in DC and throughout America.

We need to focus not on me… but US!!

Most laws passed today benefit insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and other monopolies.

How about some laws for the people?

People told me my constitutional amendments had no chance and that I was a dreamer. Dream it… Do it… #ForThePeople


2:00 PM · Feb 27, 2025

The next Governor of Florida should do a few things first…

Expunge or clear every criminal record for possession of pot.

Legalize recreational marijuana immediately. I take a gummy every night and enjoy a few puffs every now and then.

Allow people to home grow pot.  A no brainer.

And allow the hemp industry to grow and prosper.

Those would be day one and it’s what Florida wants.

Aside from whatever hallucinations might be induced by those puffs and gummies, how realistic is a third party in Florida? Might Morgan succeed in establishing one—and even becoming governor?

An unpromising history

Most people don’t realize it but there are far more than just two political parties in the United States. As of this January there were 55 distinct national-level political parties and 238 state-level parties, according to Ballotpedia.

Only the Republican and Democratic parties are qualified in all 50 states. The Libertarian Party is qualified in 38 states, the Green Party in 23 states and the Constitution Party in 12 states.

In Florida, according to the Department of State, which oversees elections, in addition to the Democratic and Republican parties, there are 14 additional qualified parties:

The No Labels Party of Florida disbanded last November and the People’s Party  had its qualification revoked last October.

For the most part third parties have revolved around individuals.

The largest and most successful was then-former President Theodore Roosevelt’s Progressive Party, better known as the Bull Moose Party, which won 27.4 percent of the vote in the 1912 presidential election—eclipsing incumbent President William Howard Taft’s Republicans, who won 23.2 percent.

The logo of Theodore Roosevelt’s Progressive, “Bull Moose” Party. (Art: Wikipedia)

That campaign only succeeded in making Democrat Woodrow Wilson president and the party collapsed when Roosevelt declined to run in 1916 and tried to hand the baton to a successor.

In more recent times third party presidential bids were made in 1980 by John Anderson, a Republican congressman from Illinois who ran against President Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, and entrepreneur Ross Perot who ran as an independent in 1992 and qualified in all states. He ran again in 1996.

In state campaigns, former professional wrestler Jesse Ventura succeeded in winning the governorship of Minnesota in 1998 as the Reform Party candidate. However, he left that party after a year and joined the Independence Party of Minnesota.

Florida has had a third party governor before.

In 1916, after losing the Democratic Party nomination under suspicious circumstances, Sidney Catts ran as the Prohibition Party candidate and won with 47.7 percent of the vote. (The Prohibition Party still exists and claims to be the oldest one in the United States.)

(Parenthetically, Catts won by pounding two themes: 1) complaining that the nomination had been stolen from him by the Democratic political machine and 2) what one historian described as “an almost psychotic anti-Catholicism.” Catts charged that the Pope in Rome was planning to come to Florida to take over the United States with the help of nuns and monks who were stockpiling weapons in convents and monasteries—along with Catholic immigrants who were flooding the country. While there was never any proof of any of his conspiracy theories, they resonated with rural Floridians.)

So no matter what its basis, there is precedent for a third party gubernatorial bid in Florida—and a victory.

Hungering for a third way

For some time there has been a hunger for a third, centrist political alternative in Florida.

In October 2022 the University of South Florida (USF) released a comprehensive public opinion survey in advance of the gubernatorial election at that time.

In the survey of 600 Floridians, 46 percent said they would be supportive of a third party and the same percentage said they would be likely to vote for a centrist, third party candidate.

The survey also showed the disillusionment with the established parties: fewer than half of respondents had a favorable view of either the Democratic or Republican parties, with only 41percent of Democrats and 43 percent of Republicans backing their own parties.

Both Democrats and Republicans felt that their parties reflected their most extreme wings (24 percent of Democrats and 30 percent of Republicans).

Have things changed in the last two years? Is Donald Trump’s presidency or Gov. Ron DeSantis’ (R) governorship driving a longing for a third alternative? Regrettably, there has not been a similar survey of public opinion in Florida since the USF survey, as best this author can determine. While there will likely be many partisan polls in the days to come, the prospects for non-partisan and objective polling and surveying is uncertain at best.

Morgan may touch a chord with his call for non-partisanship. No doubt he will be commissioning his own polls. But given Florida’s woeful lack of neutral, non-partisan public opinion research, the prospects for a third party will rest on hopes and dreams rather than hard data.

Obstacles

There are enormous obstacles to third party political bids, not least of which is qualifying for the ballot in enough jurisdictions to have a reasonable shot at winning.

Beyond just getting on the ballot, third parties face funding restraints, media indifference, legal obstacles, voter unfamiliarity and a system that is simply built around the assumption of two competing parties—in addition to the vociferous opposition of the existing parties.  

A real party aiming at a permanent presence seeks to run candidates at all levels for all open offices. As an example of this, last year Florida Democratic Chair Nicole “Nikki” Fried did extensive and strenuous work getting credible Democrats to run for all available seats. It was a major accomplishment when she filled all the slots—even if the vast majority lost. But she understood the importance of the goal.

In every recent third party instance, the party did not last beyond the candidacy of its founder and chief candidate. People like Anderson, Perot and Ventura never built the infrastructure, organization and networks required to take the party from election to election, through both victories and defeats, and build a roster of officeholders, candidates and aspirants that would allow it to endure.

If Morgan is really going to build a third party and not just a lone, independent candidacy, he needs to recruit and qualify candidates for every office up for election in 2026, from mosquito controller to governor.

The good news for him is that there is over a year and a half before the election; the bad news is that that’s actually not a lot of time for an effort of that magnitude.

Analysis: What to watch

Right now Morgan’s declaration is fueling a lot of media excitement.

Morgan himself remains very vague about the future. “I don’t know. I’m going to just test the waters,” he told Gulf Coast News’ Politics Reporter Dave Elias in an interview on Feb. 28.

He also made the point that leadership of the new party “…doesn’t have to be me” and at 68 years old going on 69, “I would consider it if all the stars lined up.”

This is salutary humility because he really has to decide between a run for governor and starting a new party. Either one is a serious endeavor and will take all his energy, attention and focus.

He could do both and that’s been the historic pattern of third party candidates. But the historic pattern is also that when attempting both, neither is done well.

Morgan certainly has the managerial, political and financial chops to make either endeavor credible: he’s built the largest injury law firm in the country, with offices in all 50 states. He’s succeeded in lobbying through two Florida constitutional amendments. He has an estimated personal and family wealth of $1.5 billion according to Forbes magazine (and $453 million in personal wealth in 2024, according to ImpactWealth.org). He could draw on talent from all over the country.

Whatever he does, if he’s going to be active he has to decide what he’s doing and get going now. As of this writing it is 612 days until Election Day, Nov. 3, 2026.

That may sound like a lot of time but when it comes to starting a real, permanent political party it’s barely the blink of an eye.

Then again, in politics, a single day can be an eternity.


Commentary: A modest proposal…

A potential party logo. (Art: Wikimedia Commons)

John Morgan says he doesn’t know what his new party name will be. He’s thinking of the “Capitalist Party.” If he chooses to go with his law firm’s slogan, it would likely be the “For the People Party.”

Here’s a thought: how about the RINO Party?

Right now RINO is an insult among Republicans, standing for “Republican In Name Only.” It’s usually used against anyone who isn’t a Trump true believer.

Owning political insults is a time honored tradition. Take the political names “Tory” and “Whig.”

A “Tory” was originally an insulting Irish name for “outlaw” (from the Middle Irish word “tóraidhe”) that British politicians hurled at their opponents in the 17th century. Over time those called tories came to own the epithet and informally adopted it as their nickname. During the American Revolution it was what revolutionaries called loyalists.

Similarly a “Whig” was the contemptuous British name for Scottish cattle drovers. It was applied to fanatical Protestants, “Whiggamores,” when they raided Edinburgh in 1648. It was used as an insult and then adopted by a British political faction. In the United States, it became the name of a major political party opposing President Andrew Jackson in the 1830s.

So owning insults with pride has a long history and there isn’t any reason that RINO shouldn’t be used the same way.

Of course, what Morgan calls his party is his business and the party’s but with a RINO (and a rhino) at least they won’t have to look far for a logo and a mascot.

What’s more, RINO doesn’t have to stand for Republican In Name Only. It could also stand for “Really Independent Nasty Opponent.”

And you’d better get out of the way when they’re charging.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

The Donalds Dossier: Byron for governor? The possibilities and pitfalls

Byron Donalds embraces Donald Trump at a 2019 awards ceremony in South Carolina. It has taken six years for Trump to embrace him back. (Image: Donalds campaign)

Feb. 23, 2025 by David Silverberg

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.) looks like a shoo-in for governor of Florida—and if the election were held tomorrow he likely would be.

The cause of the current excitement is President Donald Trump’s near-full endorsement of Donalds in an X post at 6:12 pm Thursday night, Feb. 20. The only reason it’s not a “complete and total endorsement” is that Donalds has not yet filed to run for the office. As Trump stated in his post, “should he decide to run” then he would have Trump’s “Complete and Total Endorsement.”

And the post ends with: “RUN, BYRON, RUN!”

After Trump’s years of snubs, indifference and neglect, in politics it doesn’t get much better than that.

But in fact the election is a long ways off. As of this writing it is 1 year, 8 months and 11 days before Election Day, Nov. 3, 2026—or perhaps more importantly, 1 year, 5 months and 26 days before the primary election on August 18, which will likely decide the contest.

A lot can happen.

An endorsement this early brings with it a great many advantages—and downsides.

So where does Donalds really stand in any quest for the governor’s seat in Tallahassee?

(Editor’s note: On Jan. 7, The Paradise Progressive reached out to Rep. Byron Donalds through his office with a request for an in-person interview. No response has been received to date.)

The race

Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is term-limited and must step down at the end of his current term.

While he was raised from a congressman struggling to win a Republican primary by a Trump endorsement in 2017, he then had the temerity to run for president despite the wishes of the disgraced, twice-impeached Trump in 2023.

Although Trump destroyed DeSantis’ candidacy with name-calling and insults, he has never forgiven this act of disloyalty and heresy, despite gestures of reconciliation—or in DeSantis’ case, complete and total submission.

In 2023 Donalds had to pick between DeSantis and Trump, with both of whom he had been close. In April of that year he chose to turn his back on DeSantis and endorsed Trump for president, one of the first Florida Republicans to do so. Donalds maintained ties with the former president even during his darkest days of disgrace after the January 6th insurrection (which Donalds condemned at the time, calling the rioters “lawless vigilantes,” “a bunch of lunatics,” “an unruly mob,” who were guilty of “thuggery” in “a warped display of so-called patriotism”).  For several years running, Donalds welcomed Trump to annual Christmastime fundraising visits in Naples—whose exact locations were kept secret.

Rep. Byron Donalds’ full statement in the immediate wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection and Capitol attack. (Emphasis and highlights by the author.)

When Trump ran again Donalds jumped right in. For the past two years of his term in Congress Donalds has been a faithful spear carrier for Trump in the legion of Make America Great Again (MAGA) cultists.

He actively campaigned for Trump, worked the media to regurgitate the full litany of Trump delusions, and was slavishly praiseful of the master. For a time he thought a vice presidential nod might be his but neither that nor an administration appointment came to pass when Trump won the election.  

But immediately after the election Donalds evinced an interest in the governorship. In January of this year he hired the polling and political consulting firm Fabrizio, Lee & Associates, based in Arlington, Va. Tony Fabrizio, head of the firm, did polling for Trump’s 2016 campaign and for his MAGA Inc., super political action committee.

His next move was to release a poll that showed him vastly ahead of any other potential gubernatorial contender. On Jan. 29, the Fort Myers polling firm Victory Insights released a poll that showed Donalds polling well ahead of other Republicans in a potential primary race. Donalds came in at 31 percent approval versus Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuñez at 4 percent, Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson at 3 percent, and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez at 1 percent. Donalds similarly led the field against potential candidates in an April 2024 poll by the same firm when pitted against Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-1-Fla.), Rep. Michael Waltz (R-6-Fla.), Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis and Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson. (Waltz has since been named National Security Advisor.)

These polls could be dismissed as campaign tactics to scare potential rivals out of the race, given that they were not conducted by a disinterested party like a non-partisan pollster or an academic institution. Further, among hundreds of other pollsters, Victory Insights has been rated 209th by ABC/538.com, which gave it a one-star rating overall, a score of 1 for bias (negative numbers are better) and a low .7 score for transparency, the amount of information it discloses about its polls.

Also, these polls left out other potential rivals, most notably Casey DeSantis, Florida’s first lady who is also rumored to be considering a run.

Whether or not Donalds’ polls showed the true state of play or not, they certainly served the purpose of impressing Trump, who first referenced the Jan. 29 poll in a Feb. 17 Truth Social posting highlighted by Donalds.

The Feb. 20 Trump near-endorsement has led to a wave of publicity and media coverage virtually presuming that Donalds is already elected governor.

But that is hardly the case.

The advantages

There’s no doubt the Trump endorsement carries great weight in Florida, which Trump carried by 56 percent in the 2024 election.

It has undoubtedly already scared off many potential rivals. Those who might think of running will certainly reconsider.

Perhaps the greatest advantage of the Trump endorsement is its potential to open the spigots of cash that will be necessary.

That cash will be important. With numerous fragmented media markets, Florida is an expensive place to run a statewide campaign.

All indications are that Donalds is not widely known in the state outside of his Southwest Florida district, nor does he have a large or devoted following. A statewide campaign will have to introduce him to the majority of Florida Republicans and then all other voters and that will take a lot of money.

However, Florida elections can be bought, as evidenced by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), another personally unpopular politician who has run very expensive campaigns that he won on very thin margins.

In his congressional campaigns Donalds was dependent on corporate and ideological political action committees (PACs), which heavily funded his races in exchange for a variety of ideological and political pledges. The Trump endorsement raises the prospect that Elon Musk, the shadow president, Trump backer and richest man in the world, will intervene on Donalds’ behalf. If so, Donalds wouldn’t have to rely on numerous PACs but would be completely beholden to Musk alone.

A Donalds victory would play to Trump’s advantage in that he would be getting a completely subservient governor of ostentatious loyalty in his home state.

Also, if Donalds wins, Trump’s record as a kingmaker remains intact. As his endorsement elevated DeSantis in 2017, he would show that he could do it again and that he completely dominates Florida.

All voters regardless of party should take comfort in one aspect of the endorsement: it indicates that Trump expects there to be a competitive 2026 election, as scheduled. In the radical regime Trump has established, that is not to be taken for granted.

The disadvantages

Being the front runner makes Donalds the biggest target in the field. Being the front runner two years out from the election means there will be a lot of time for rivals and opponents to marshal their resources to hit that target.

That means two years of opposition research into all of Donalds’ personal failings, failures and faults—and Donalds’ life and his family will be subject to a scrutiny and exposure he has never experienced as a state legislator or congressional candidate.

When he was 19 years old, Donalds was arrested for drug possession with intent to sell and was let off easy. He has never hidden it and acknowledged it in his very first run for Congress. There was also a bribery allegation when he was a student, for which he gave various explanations and which was expunged from his record.

Last July, The Florida Trident, an independent investigative news site, featured an article based on an interview with Donalds’ first wife, Bisa Hall (Trident Exclusive: Trump VP hopeful Byron Donalds’ ex-wife shares her story, says what he’s doing is “super-dangerous”).

It was detailed, extensive and revealing. Hall was alarmed by Donalds’ relationship with Trump.

“I have big reactions to that man, I don’t think he’s a good human,” Hall said of Trump. “It’s not even political; I just think he’s a bad person.”

She continued: “To see [Trump and Donalds] in collusion together, it was like, ‘If [Donalds] were a good human, would this very bad person be pushing him as a poster child?’” she asked rhetorically. “They’re both very opportunistic. You trot him out there and it makes some people feel better about Trump. I think what he’s doing is super dangerous and I think morally he and I have no crossover at all.”

Hall is African-American. She and Donalds met while they were students at Florida A&M University. They married in 1999 when her scholarship ran out and she needed a claim to Florida residency to maintain her in-state tuition.

After their marriage Donalds attended Florida State University where, despite his marriage, he started dating a white, wealthy student named Erika Lees from a politically conservative family (and to whom he didn’t reveal he was married, according to Hall). When he got Lees pregnant in 2003, he asked Hall for an expedited divorce—and also asked her to cover the divorce costs. He promised to pay her back, which he had not done as of last July, Hall stated.

Donalds married Erika on March 15, 2003. They had their first child five months and six days later.

“I don’t find him considerate, I don’t find him genuine,” Hall said of Donalds. “In all these years since, you’ve changed the nature of your character? No.”

At one time these kinds of allegations and this kind of behavior would have disqualified a candidate for elected office at any level. However, in an era when a convicted felon, sexual assaulter, mob inciter, contract welcher and even arguably a murderer (Iranian General Qassem Soleimani) can be elected president, Donalds’ misdeeds and misbehavior are unlikely to count as disqualifiers with the Florida public.

There is also Donalds’ congressional record, which is hardly distinguished, featuring just one signed piece of legislation enacted into law during his first four years in office.

Nor does he have any relevant management experience that would even remotely qualify him for an executive job like the governorship.

And then there is the one big and unavoidable factor Donalds has tried to overcome, ignore or get the public to overlook in his public career—when it suited his interests. When it served his interests he took a different tack.

The race card

If elected, Donalds would be Florida’s first African-American governor. Race will play an inescapable role in the campaign.

From the very beginning, Donalds has used his race to build his brand—in contrast to most black politicians and activists who have sought to further civil rights and end racial discrimination.

“Today, I’m everything the fake news media tells you doesn’t exist,” he said in a 2020 campaign ad. “A strong, Trump-supporting, gun-owning, liberty-loving, pro-life, politically incorrect Black man.”

After working as a financial advisor in the private sector, Donalds began his political career in 2010, running as a Tea Party candidate opposed to the nation’s first African-American president, Barack Obama.

Donalds said he was inspired to get into politics by the 2008 financial collapse, which occurred on the watch of Republican President George W. Bush. Nonetheless, Donalds leaped into the Tea Party movement.

Byron Donalds in 2010, speaking at a Tea Party rally.(Image: YouTube/Byron Donalds)

His 2012 congressional campaign bid failed but he was elected to the Florida legislature in 2016, representing the 80th House District, which covered largely rural eastern Collier County and the mostly Hispanic, migrant farming town of Immokalee. Donalds won the Republican primary with 64 percent of the vote and was unopposed in the general election.

In 2016 he was all in on the campaign for Donald Trump.

In 2020, upon the retirement of Rep. Francis Rooney from the 19th Congressional District, Donalds barely edged out a nine-candidate Republican field to win the primary and then the general election against Democrat Cindy Banyai.

Throughout this career, Donalds advanced and defended a movement that was largely seen by critics as white-supremacy oriented and often racist, especially in Florida, which had a history of deep segregation and racial violence.

Donalds even saw a silver lining in the segregationist Jim Crow era when he said last June at a Trump campaign event for black conservatives that “during Jim Crow the black family was together. During Jim Crow more black people were not just conservative—black people were always conservative minded—more black people voted conservatively. And then, HEW [Health, Education and Welfare], Lyndon Johnson, and then you go down that road and we are where we are.”

His consistent defense of the MAGA movement and promotion of Trump brought the scorn of his black colleagues in Congress.

“[For what it’s worth, Byron Donalds] is not a historic candidate for Speaker,” tweeted Rep. Cori Bush (D-1-Mo.) in January 2023 after Donalds made an unsuccessful bid for Speaker of the House. “He is a prop. Despite being Black, he supports a policy agenda intent on upholding and perpetuating white supremacy. His name being in the mix is not progress—it’s pathetic.”

His entire time in Congress, Donalds was snubbed by the Congressional Black Caucus, which has not added him to its ranks to this day.

As recently as Jan. 22, Donalds was defending Trump’s attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in an interview with Chris Cuomo on the cable network News Nation.

“Look, I think at the end of the day everybody wants to be sure that people that are getting jobs are qualified to do them,” Donalds told Cuomo. “That is most important but you can’t put diversity for diversity’s sake ahead of qualifications.”

(Perhaps it is unkind to point this out but Donalds himself lacks executive and managerial experience and qualifications for a governorship, which is an executive, managerial job.)

Rep. Byron Donalds is interviewed by Chris Cuomo on Jan. 22. (Image: News Nation)

Ironically, if he runs for governor, the attacks on Donalds for his uncritical Trumpism and opposition to inclusion are likely to be loudest outside Florida, coming from national black politicians and civil rights activists.

Within the state, the Trump endorsement may move Florida’s MAGA faithful in Donalds’ direction and dampen any racist white supremacist objections to him. Given the state’s current political makeup, Donalds only has to win the Republican primary in August to be elected. The Trump endorsement will likely go a long way toward achieving that goal.

Nationally, Trump is no doubt hoping the endorsement will deflect longstanding charges of racism against him, especially given his wholescale attacks on DEI in the federal government and in society generally.

Whether a “prop” or shield for Trump, the role of “politically incorrect Black man” is one that Donalds is clearly only too happy to play. Whether it gets him into the governor’s mansion will be determined when the votes are counted.

The danger of disruption

Another danger of declaring a candidacy two years out is that major disruptions can intervene and nowhere is this truer than in Florida, where hurricanes and other disasters play outsized political roles.

There is nothing that tests a chief executive like a natural disaster—and while the public may not remember a good response, it never forgets a bad one. Rick Scott, for all his other failings, performed fairly well as governor in the face of Hurricane Irma in 2017. So did DeSantis in the face of hurricanes Ian, Idalia, Debby, Helene and Milton.

Donalds has never been tested in an executive role in the face of a disaster.

This is particularly ironic in that his coastal district on the Gulf of Mexico is very vulnerable to extreme weather events and suffered extreme devastation from Hurricane Ian in 2022.

Donalds’ responses to disasters has always been tepid, tardy and tentative. He has walked the ruined landscape for photo opportunities with other Florida politicians once the storm was over and joined his Florida colleagues sending letters to federal agencies calling for relief. However, he has never been aggressive in seeking aid or intervening on his constituents’ behalf. Nor has he advanced legislation to provide relief and protection from his district’s other environmental threat, harmful algal blooms.

Two hurricane seasons loom in the time until the election and if Donalds is a gubernatorial  aspirant his reactions will be in the spotlight, even if he doesn’t have the executive authority to command the response. What is more, Florida will be dealing with a purged and weakened Federal Emergency Management Agency and a federal government whose budget-cutting will severely undermine the kind of relief and support it can provide, whether that means boots on the ground or dollars in the bank.

On top of that, DeSantis will still be in the governor’s seat and his wife may be running to succeed him. There is a real possibility that DeSantis will blame Donalds rather than Trump or Elon Musk for any shortcomings in emergency responses and any lack of federal resources and personnel available to aid afflicted areas—and Florida’s Republican voters will believe him.

Hurricanes aren’t the only kinds of disaster that could derail a Donalds gubernatorial run in the next two years: the state, along with the rest of the nation could face an economic crash, another epidemic, a drastic drop in the food supply due to livestock or agricultural issues, hyper-inflation, a trade cutoff, Social Security termination, an energy crisis or any other number of calamities, self-inflicted or otherwise. In Washington an enervated and eviscerated federal government may be unable to help.

Trump’s actions and policies are increasing the likelihood of all those dangers. As the face of Trumpism in Florida, Donalds may get much of the blame, no matter how much he and Trump try to deflect or distract the public.

The forgotten district

Lost amidst all this is the district that Donalds was elected to represent in Congress, Florida’s 19th.

Donalds has never shown a great deal of interest in the district; he’s made clear that it’s only a stepping stone for him to move on to grander things. He wouldn’t even be living in the district if DeSantis hadn’t gerrymandered the congressional map in 2020 to include his home address, which is east of Interstate 75.

If he largely neglected the district in the past, in the next two years Donalds is likely to give it his “complete and total” inattention.

Instead, if he runs he will be fixated on campaigning throughout the state, reaching out to voters from the Panhandle to Key West and relentlessly pursuing the prize. The local problems and needs of Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach, Estero, Bonita Springs, Naples and Marco Island will just be an annoyance, like sand flies buzzing at the beach.

Analysis: Peaking too early?

Given the range of uncertainties and possible pitfalls, it is entirely possible that the Donalds gubernatorial campaign may have just peaked, two years before it needs to climax.

It’s also worth noting that as of this writing, Donalds has not formally filed his candidacy papers or announced that he is actually running. He has until noon on April 24, 2026 to qualify for the primary.

At the Conservative Political Action Committee meeting in Maryland on Feb. 21, Donalds told attendees to “stay tuned” for his possible candidacy.

Despite his hiring of the Fabrizio firm, there exists the possibility that Donalds might not run or might seek a different office. After all, the Trump endorsement urged him to “RUN, BYRON, RUN”—meaning Donalds was undecided.

But in the MAGAverse a Trump suggestion is tantamount to the master’s command. It’s worth remembering what the son of 2022 Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker told the world in an X posting during that campaign:

“The Truth: Trump called my dad for months DEMANDING that he run. Everyone with a brain begged him: ‘PLEASE DON’T DO THIS. This is too dirty, you have an insane past… PLEASE DON’T DO THIS.’ We got the middle finger. He ran.”

The problem with supporting a dictator is that sometimes the dictator dictates that you do something you don’t want to do and you have no choice but to obey. If there is any reluctance on Donalds’ part—which seems unlikely—Trump has commanded him to run and as a loyal MAGA he must.

The Trump command and endorsement also means that for the next two years Donalds will also have to stay in the good graces of Trump, a notoriously fickle and mercurial master who has invariably turned on the people around him, betraying allies, supporters and sycophants alike.

That’s a tall and perhaps impossible order.

But for the past eight years Donalds has tied his fate and future to this felonious godfather. In 2024 that paid off when Trump won the presidency again. It may pay off in 2026 with the governorship.

Or then again, he may end up at the end of two years like Rudy Giuliani, who also gave his soul to Donald Trump and went from Time’s Man of the Year and “America’s Mayor” to a soulless,  impoverished, hair dye-dripping, clownish caricature of himself.

It’s worth contemplating Giuliani’s fate as Trump’s servant. As Florida pundit and Trump opponent Rick Wilson has pointed out: “everything Trump touches dies.”

That truism may now apply to the United States, the state of Florida, and ultimately, depending on his life choices, Byron Donalds himself.

To read The Paradise Progressive’s previous coverage of Rep. Byron Donalds, click here.

Liberty lives in light

                                                        © 2025 by David Silverberg                                                      

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

After the storm: Looking ahead at the state of democracy

A lecture delivered at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Greater Naples, Fla., Feb. 5, 2025.

The author speaking at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Greater Naples, Fla. (Image: UUCGN)

This was the 2025 kickoff of the Progressive Voices speaker series.

The speech begins at mark 13:00 and goes to mark 43:00 followed by the Q&A. Total time is 1 hour, 18 minutes.

As prepared for delivery

Feb. 5, 2025

I know that I’m speaking on a secular topic. But since we’re in a house of worship, I thought that it would be appropriate to begin with a story from the Old Testament.

I take as my text Genesis 25, from verses 23 to 29.

It tells the story of Esau and Jacob, both sons of Isaac. Esau was the older son, a hunter-gatherer and due to inherit all his father’s flocks and wealth. Jacob was “a man of the tents,” a pastoralist and a homebody.

One day Esau came in from hunting in the fields, he was tired and hungry and Jacob was at a fire cooking what the King James version calls “pottage,” or in Hebrew, “adamshim.” It was a stew or soup and the Bible is very specific: it consisted of lentils, or beans, and bread and it was colored red. It sounds like a chili.

Esau was famished and demanded a portion – the King James version calls it “a mess”—of the stew. Jacob said he could have it, but he would have to trade his birthright—his inheritance—for it. Esau, according to the story, said he couldn’t see any use for his birthright and he just wanted to eat so he agreed.

So based on this conversation, Jacob became the inheritor of all his father’s wealth, with the ultimate result that he became the father of the nation of Israel and Esau was left to live off roaming and hunting.

So why is this story relevant today?

On November 4, 2024, Americans had a birthright—a birthright—to inalienable rights, among them democracy, freedom of thought, expression, worship, health, freedom from want and freedom from fear. They had a right to determine how they were governed and a right to assemble and protest when they didn’t like it. They had a right to American citizenship at birth—a literal birthright.

The next day, on November 5, 2024, when the votes were counted, a narrow majority had chosen to sell that birthright for a stew of lies, illusions, hatreds, empty promises and a mirage of lower grocery prices. Talk about a literal “mess of pottage.” Talk about selling your birthright!

So here find ourselves today. And I’m sure you’re wondering, as I am, what to do and how to respond and most of all, how to protect what we hold dear, our freedom, our rights and out Constitution.

Now, we can go over all the awfulness that has happened so far. But given our limited time, I think that’s unproductive. We all have our lists of outrages.  We can get into what I call a “spiral of hate.” I think it’s more essential to figure out how we’re going to preserve our freedoms, our democracy and ultimately—our sanity.

And that brings to mind another Biblical reference: The Book of Ecclesiastes. “To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to sow and a time to reap,” and it goes on to enumerate the different actions.

Well I would add: There’s a time to progress and a time to protect.

I think it’s pretty clear that now is the time to protect and defend.

In our system we have our say in an election and then we give the levers of power to those we elect, trusting they’ll act responsibly on our behalf.

But this time, this is not a mere change of administrations. It’s a revolution from the top starting with Donald Trump and it’s from the right from his cultists, enablers and his sycophants. It aims to affect every aspect of our lives.

Those of us who are so inclined are not going to break any new ground. We’re not going to right newly found wrongs. We have to protect and defend the essentials: our birthright, which means our inalienable rights to life, liberty and happiness, our democracy and our Constitution—because they’re all under attack.

Trump aims to reverse not merely the past four years of the Biden administration, Trump wants to reverse the past 80 years of social progress since Fascism’ s defeat in 1945.

Think of it: they say “make America great again.” When was it great, in their view? How far back do they want to go?

Well, in their attack on birthright citizenship, Trump and his minions are seeking to turn the national clock back to the Dred Scott decision of 1857, when the Supreme Court declared that black people could not be United States citizens.

You have to conclude: Donald Trump sees the time when America was “great” as the time before the Civil War when there were masters and slaves, when black people were considered three-fifths of a human being and when women did not have the vote. He even wants to go back to the days of the Know Nothing Party of the 1850s when there was a movement to cut off immigration and suppress Catholicism.

Everyone who vowed last year that “we won’t go back,” had it right—we shouldn’t. But that’s where this is all going.

Actually, you can make the argument that Trump wants to turn the clock back to before there was a Constitution and a Bill of Rights, to a time when America was ruled by a single ruler, a monarchy. Remember, the word “monarchy” is derived from the Greek words for one, “mono” and power or authority, “archy.” It just means that power flows from a single source, not necessarily someone with the  title “king.”

I would also argue with people who say this is an “oligarchy,” which means rule by a small group. It’ s also been called a “kakistocracy,” rule by the worst people, or a “kleptocracy,” rule by compulsive thieves.

Whatever it is, it’s not democracy, rule by the people.

I wish I could say that we can change this with the push of a button but right now but frankly, I can’t do that.

But today all the levers of power, from the White House to the Capitol, and here in Florida, to the governorship and the statehouse and even down to the Collier County Board of Commissioners are in Trumpist hands. We can’t count on the judiciary or those who implement judicial rulings. As we saw in the special session of this state’s legislature, Republicans in charge are competing with each other to be as extreme as possible in their submission to Trump’s will.

It’s already an awful year and it’s going to get worse. What’s more, it’s going to do permanent damage to the country and its standing in the world.

When I think about it, I’d compare it to a hurricane and as Floridians we all know what to do when those come around: get lots of bottled water, check your batteries, and prepare for a siege.

One other thing that’s a good idea in the runup to a hurricane is to take stock and make an inventory. That means going around the house, maybe taking pictures of each room and all your possessions.

But in this storm it means taking stock of ourselves. I’m not going to offer specific actions or global prescriptions. Right letters to the editor? Yes. Phone banking? Yes. Demonstrating? Yes. Most of all, of course, I’m sure all of us here voted, which is the most important thing although we don’t get another chance until 2026—I hope.

A resistance is coalescing. Democrats, with both a capital D and a small d are regrouping and reorganizing. People who may have been indifferent are now paying attention. People who thought they knew what they were getting with their vote are now waking up to what they really elected.

But that’ s going to take time and in this storm each of has to ask: How can I personally resist the crimes and these injustices I see happening? What can I personally do to protect my freedom and my country’s freedom? How can I personally preserve my rights and the rights of all my friends, family, neighbors, and fellow citizens? How can I personally defend the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the democracy I believe in?

And we have to ask ourselves these questions each and every day because they’ll all be under assault each and every day.

I would point out some dangers where extra attention is necessary and these are potential changes that would permanently institutionalize a dictatorship.

One is any change to the Constitution or Bill of Rights. Whether it’s eliminating birthright citizenship, or ending presidential term limits—in other words, making Trump president for life. Changing the Constitution is, to use a political phrase, a “hill to die on.”

Another is declaration of a state of emergency. This is a classic dictatorial tactic. It’s what Adolf Hitler used after the Reichstag fire. It gives an executive additional, nearly unrestricted powers. It usually means crushing democracy in the name of facing the emergency. Trump has already declared two emergencies—one on the border and one on energy, giving himself power to deploy the military and take on other powers. Another one on the economy has been rumored. But where this will really be dangerous is when it comes to elections. Remember, in 2020, he was considering having the military seize voting machines and he tried to overthrow the results.

That brings us to another threat to watch: any attempt to postpone, suspend or cancel elections. All elections must be conducted on time, as scheduled. That means insisting on a free, fair and open election in two years.

We also have to defend a free press. There’s a lot of turmoil in media right now and some very disappointing kowtowing to Trump in major media—and in local media. We’re already being inundated by a tsunami of lies and propaganda. But we have to determine how we can each seek truth and to the degree that we can, make sure that our media fulfills its fundamental mission.

We can only hope that our judiciary and law enforcement remain true to the law and its impartial application. The early signs are not promising. But to the degree that any of us have any influence we need to do what we can to keep our justice system just.

Like a hurricane, this is all scary and intimidating and seems overwhelming. But also like a hurricane, there’s a point when the storm passes. Even Trump’s storm will eventually run out of energy. The historical pattern is that the regime and the MAGA movement will probably devolve into factionalism and squabbling, especially once Trump himself passes from the scene in some form or fashion.

Also, as I said, resistance to the most extreme measures is already congealing. But that still has a long way to go to be effective.

Now, I’ve been purposefully vague in these remarks because I wanted to provide an overview. I’d like to get into the specifics you have on your minds in the question and answer period, which I hope will be vigorous and lively. Please, challenge everything I’ve said. I truly hope that the bad predictions I’ve made are wrong. I’ve never wanted to be proven wrong so badly.

I want to leave you with two quotes that I think are very relevant to our moment.

I actually heard one when I was working as a journalist in Washington and it came from, of all people, the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Bandar bin Sultan. He was a very elegant and accomplished man, spoke perfect English and he was addressing an audience of diplomats and high officials at the Cosmopolitan Club. He said something then that has stayed with me ever since.

He said, “We in positions of great responsibility have a duty to be optimists.” Now, he was talking to diplomats and a diplomat can never just throw up his or her hands and just say, “It’s hopeless, I give up.” No matter what the problem, there’s always a solution, you just haven’t found it yet. So you’ve got to keep working at it, sometimes it takes years, even decades but there’s no giving up—it’s not an option.

Well, I would argue that all of us are in positions of great responsibility—we’re American citizens. We the people have to make sure the fate of the country remains in our hands. We can’t just throw up our hands and walk away. We will solve these problems, we just haven’t found a way yet. We have an absolute duty to be optimists.

The other quote is this: “America is great because it is good. When it ceases to be good, it will cease to be great.”

This quote has been attributed to Alexis de Toqueville, the French political scientist and traveler who visited the United States in the 1830s and recorded his observations.

Now, President Ronald Reagan’s speechwriters went looking for this quote in de Toqueville and couldn’t find it anywhere.

But it really doesn’t matter. If de Toqueville didn’t say it, he should have, because it’s true.

Right now, America isn’t good, so it’s not going to be great, no matter how much Trump and his clones bray to the contrary.

I think it’s up to us, we the people, to do whatever we can, whenever we can, wherever we can, to try to make America good again.

I’m actually confident we’ll succeed. But only when we do that, will we REALLY make America great again.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

SCOOP! Collier County Republicans condemn Republican officials for supporting TRUMP Act over DeSantis bill—Updated

“When elephants battle, the grass gets trampled”–African proverb. (Art: AI)

Feb. 6, 2025 by David Silverberg

Updated 4:40 pm with additional material.

Updated Feb. 10 with comment from John Meo.

Four prominent local Republican elected officials were condemned in absentia on Monday, Feb. 3, by the Collier County Republican Executive Committee (CCREC) for failing to support an anti-immigration bill favored by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R).

The CCREC voted further to censure the officials if they continued to support the legislative version of the bill in question, the Tackling and Reforming Unlawful Migration Policy (TRUMP) Act (CS/SB 2-B), which passed the both the Florida House and Senate on Jan. 28 in a special session.

None of those condemned were present when the resolution passed by a voice vote.

The condemnation was directed at State Sen. Kathleen Passidomo (R-28-Naples), former president of the Florida Senate, and state Reps. Lauren Melo (R-82-eastern Collier County), Yvette Benarroch (R-81-western Collier County) and Adam Botana (R-80-Lee and northern Collier counties).

The meeting was chaired by CCREC Chair John Meo. Lawyer Douglas Lewis projected both the TRUMP Act and the DeSantis bill version on a screen before the audience. The audience was asked for a show of hands on which legislation they favored. The DeSantis legislation was overwhelmingly favored by a voice vote at the end of the presentation. Meo called the vote unanimous but the group’s parliamentarian corrected him that there were dissenting voices.

At the outset of the meeting Michael Lyster, former chair of the CCREC, argued against proceeding with the agenda item, saying that it was premature and the resolution was improper. He argued that under the CCREC’s rules it cannot censure the party’s elected Republican officials. However, he was ignored.

All the officials were in the Florida capital of Tallahassee at the time and did not participate or have the opportunity to participate in person or remotely. There were no speakers presenting the officials’ side of the story.

The resolution

The Republican Party of Florida (RPOF) officially endorsed the TRUMP Act over DeSantis’ bill, which prompted the CCREC response.

A Republican Party of Florida flyer endorsing the TRUMP Act. Below, the CCREC’s response.
A CCREC flyer responding to the RPOF.

After its establishing clauses stating the current situation as it sees it, the CCREC resolution “formally expresses its displeasure with the Florida Legislature” and “fully supports” both DeSantis’ and Trump’s efforts to deport “criminal illegal aliens.”

It calls on the named Republican legislators to work with DeSantis but if they “fail to work with Governor DeSantis and fail to vote in favor of strong legislation and appropriations, on or before the end of March 2025” on legislation “acceptable to Governor DeSantis” [emphasis theirs], then the CCREC would hold a formal vote censuring the officials.

(Thanks to multiple sources, the full resolution is available at the conclusion of this article.)

Present at the meeting were Collier County commissioners Chris Hall (R-District 2), Dan Kowal (R-District 4), and William McDaniel (R-District 5), School Board members Jerry Rutherford (District 1) and Tim Moshier (District 5). Also attending was Chris Worrell, a Proud Boys member convicted of assaulting police officers with a chemical agent during the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol, who evaded police before being apprehended and incarcerated, and who was just pardoned by Trump.

According to attendees who requested anonymity, the whole event was rushed through, with presentation of the resolutions, debate and a vote taking place in the space of a half hour.

“The CCREC taking action to censure legislators before anything has been decided is totally not within their purview,” Diane de Parys, a former member of the CCREC and president of the Republican Women of SW Florida Federated, told The Paradise Progressive. “The role of the CCREC under the Republican Party of Florida is to get out the vote and taking positions on special session bills that have not been decided is totally wrong in my opinion.”

“Heated, political discourse is to be expected in these challenging times. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with the CCREC disagreeing with how an elected official voted,” noted former Republican county commissioner Penny Taylor in a publicly distributed email. “But leadership who ignore the basic [tenets] of fairness such as giving a man or woman his or her day in court before passing judgement … that leadership is reckless and needs to be questioned.”

“Everyone knew it was going on,” Meo told The Paradise Progressive in a Saturday, Feb., 8th phone call. “Everyone got notice 24 hours beforehand and as far as the number of people complaining, there were very few; not more than two or three.”

The legislators named were able to join remotely. “They had input,” he said. “They could have Zoomed in.” He said he spoke to Melo and Benarroch the week before the meeting. He made the point that the presentation took 35 minutes and was very detailed regarding the dueling bills.

Meo said that there had not been any critical feedback since the meeting and that the majority of Republicans “have been very supportive.”

He also reiterated his support for the substance of the resolution. “We’re in a virtual war with criminal illegals where they’re taking over hotels in cities,” he said. He also hoped that DeSantis, as head of the Florida Republican Party would work out a compromise with legislative leaders but “stay strong” because one thing he cannot abide is having immigration enforcement in the office of Commissioner of Agriculture.

Comment was also requested from Passidomo, Melo, Benarroche, and Botana but no response had been received as of posting time. (This report will be updated if responses are received.)

The context

The CCREC vote comes amidst a dispute between DeSantis and the legislature over the best means of cracking down on undocumented migrants in Florida.

On Jan. 13, DeSantis called for a special session of the legislature in order to pass 10 measures against undocumented migrants, among other proposals. The governor’s bill would:

  1. Mandate maximum participation in the 287(g) deportation program, with penalties for non-compliance, including suspension of officials;
  2. Establish a state crime for entering the U.S. illegally and a process for self-deportation;
  3. Appoint a dedicated officer to oversee coordination with federal authorities and the Unauthorized Alien Transport Program (UATP);
  4. Expand UATP to detain and facilitate the deportation of illegal aliens from the U.S.;
  5. Broaden the legal definition of gang-related activities to include more groups of dangerous illegal aliens;
  6. Repeal in-state college tuition for illegal immigrant students;
  7. Require voter registration affirmation of U.S. citizenship and Florida residency;
  8. Increase penalties for unauthorized aliens committing voter fraud or providing false voter registration information;
  9. Mandate identity verification for foreign remittance transfers; and
  10. Create a rebuttable presumption that illegal aliens are flight risks and deny bail. 

Florida state Senate President Sen. Ben Albritton (R-56-DeSoto and Hardee counties) and Speaker of the House Rep. Daniel Perez (R-116-Miami-Dade County) pushed back against DeSantis’ special session call, labeling it “premature.”

In a memorandum issued within hours of DeSantis’ call, the two stated: “It is completely irresponsible to get out ahead of any announcements President Trump will make, especially when uninformed or ill-timed state action could potentially impair or impede the success of President Trump’s forthcoming efforts to end illegal immigration, close our borders, and protect the sovereignty of our nation.”

The dispute became personal as DeSantis accused Albritton and Perez of “theatrics” and called them “RINOs” (Republicans in Name Only) and said their bill “gutted all the enforcement provisions” in his bill.

“This  is really the SWAMP Act,” he scoffed and complained the bill, “takes power away from me … the power that I’m currently exercising now.”

After an initial standoff, the legislative leaders convened the governor’s special session on Jan. 28 but then immediately adjourned it, without passing any legislation. Then, the same day, they convened their own session and passed the TRUMP Act.

The major difference between the governor’s proposal and the legislature’s bill was that authority for enforcement was put in the hands of the Commissioner of Agriculture, in this case Florida Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson.

In 2023, DeSantis had used his authority as governor and state funds to transfer migrants to locations such as Martha’s Vineyard, Mass., and the Vice Presidential Residence in Washington, DC, as a show of protest and to make a political point. Under the TRUMP Act he would no longer have that authority.

DeSantis was clearly furious when the legislature passed the TRUMP Act.

“They decided to do a bill that not only won’t work, that actually is weaker than what we have today,” he said during a roundtable discussion at the Brevard County’s Sheriff’s Office in Titusville. “Everything that I’ve proposed is stronger than what the Legislature has done.”

Albritton and Perez slapped back with a letter issued the same day: “The Legislature will not act in a disingenuous or dishonorable way by attacking anyone, especially our law enforcement. Unlike others, the Legislature is not interested in misleading or attacking Floridians, especially Florida law enforcement. Our number one goal is to work together with President Trump. Anyone that says anything otherwise is not reading the bill, not reading executive orders, or just not telling the truth.”

DeSantis threatened to act politically against legislators who voted for the TRUMP Act by using funding from his Florida Freedom Fund Political Action Committee to oppose them in primaries.

“The FL Freedom Fund was instrumental in raising huge sums of $ to defeat Amendments 3 and 4 in 2024,” he posted on X on Jan. 30. “For the 2026 cycle, the FFF will raise even more resources (1) to ensure support for a strong conservative gubernatorial candidate and (2) to support strong conservative candidates in legislative primaries. We need to elect strong leaders who will build off FL’s success and who will deliver on the promises made to voters.”

He stated he would veto the legislation when it came to his desk.

As of this writing, there are indications that the two sides were in discussions and might find an accommodation.

“We’ve had great discussions. I think we’re going to land the plane,” DeSantis said on Feb. 3.

Analysis: Impact

Locally, it’s unclear how much weight the CCREC condemnation or censure will have in local Republican politics or how much influence it will have with local Republican lawmakers. However, it yet again displays a streak of authoritarianism that has long been associated with the CCREC and with those local Republican activists who repeatedly use threats to intimidate officials into surrendering to their demands.

And it also bears noting the real losers in all these disputes: migrants and immigrants of all legal status whose labor provides the products, services and assistance that keeps the local, state and national economies working and prosperous.

Below, the full text of the CCREC resolution.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Diaz-Balart is silent as Venezuelans in his district face deportation

Demonstrators in Miami, Fla., protest what was widely seen as a rigged election in Venezuela in 2019 that kept President Nicolas Maduro in power. Venezuelans in the United States have now lost their temporary protected status under President Donald Trump. (Photo: VOA)

Jan. 31, 2025 by David Silverberg

Correction: Feb. 2 — Rep. Darren Soto’s party affiliation was initially incorrectly listed. He is a Democrat.

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-26-Fla.), an outspoken foe of authoritarian Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, while praising President Donald Trump for his immigration crackdown, is otherwise staying silent as Venezuelan asylum-seekers in his district face deportation.

On Tuesday, Jan. 28, the US Department of Homeland Security revoked temporary protective status (TPS) for 600,000 Venezuelans granted permission to live in the United States.

Many of these Venezuelans live in Doral, Fla., in Diaz-Balart’s district. Of Doral’s seven Zip codes, six are fully in the 26th district and one he shares with Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-28-Fla.).

According to 2020 census figures, 30 percent of the residents of Doral, Fla., were of Venezuelan origin. The town’s total population as of 2023 was 79,359 people. Overall, an estimated 640,000 people of Venezuelan origin resided in the United States in 2021, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Many of these people are under TPS, which grants migrants permission to reside in the United States for 6, 12 or 18-month periods while their longer-term status is determined. TPS can be granted to migrants when their home country has been determined to be too dangerous for residence because of civil strife, environmental or other life-threatening causes. For example, in 2010 Haitian migrants were granted TPS following a massive earthquake in Haiti.

Ironically, Diaz-Balart, along with Rep. Darren Soto (D-9-Fla.), was a sponsor of the Venezuela TPS Act in 2019. It passed the House and was initially resisted by Trump but he signed it into law just prior to his departure in 2021. President Joe Biden’s administration granted TPS to Venezuelan migrants in March 2021.

Under the terms of TPS, the Venezuelans can live and work in the United States and can travel abroad and return.

The Venezuelans were allowed in the United States because conditions in Venezuela under Maduro were deemed too harsh economically and politically.

At the time Diaz-Balart stated that “[w]e must not force Venezuelans who have sought safety in the United States to return to such dangerous conditions.”

On Jan. 20, Diaz-Balart hailed Trump’s inauguration as “a new golden age in America.”

On Jan. 29, Trump signed the Laken Riley Act, a law named after a young woman in Georgia who was murdered by an undocumented Venezuelan migrant last February. The law authorizes officials of the Department of Homeland Security to arrest and detain aliens who have committed crimes and gives states the standing to sue the federal government for failures to enforce the law. It is the law that is being widely used in roundups and deportations of migrants with criminal records.

The same day, Diaz-Balart and Reps. Carlos Gimenez (R-28-Fla.) and Maria Elvira Salazar (R-27-Fla.), all of whom have districts that include numerous Venezuelans, issued a joint statement supporting Trump and the migrant crackdown.

Saying that the Maduro regime was “one of the world’s most repressive dictatorships” and its failures had forced millions of Venezuelans to flee, it stated: “Unfortunately, we have seen how some individuals, such as members of the Tren de Aragua [a Venezuelan gang] have exploited our generosity and flouted our laws, with connections to both the Maduro regime and organized crime.”

It also noted that Trump had granted Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) status to Venezuelans in the United States, ensuring their safety. DED, in contrast to TPS, provides an indefinite period of refuge to aliens at the president’s discretion.

It concluded: “The Venezuelan people have endured repression, corruption, and human rights abuses for far too long in Venezuela, and it is still not safe for many to return. We will continue to do everything possible to ensure that those seeking freedom from persecution and oppression are protected.” (Emphasis ours.)

On Jan. 24, Salazar, whose district includes many resident aliens, wrote a letter to the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security asking for leniency for non-criminal migrants.

“I’m urging Homeland Security to PROTECT Cubans awaiting legal status adjustment through the Cuban Adjustment Act,” she stated in a posting on X. “We must ALSO protect the Venezuelans and Nicaraguans without a criminal record going through the asylum process. Don’t penalize them for Biden’s screw-ups!”

She expressed concern over how immigration enforcement would be implemented. She also insisted “Individuals must be afforded due process.”

However, to date, other than his joint statement with Gimenez and Salazar, Diaz-Balart has not publicly weighed in on behalf of the Venezuelans in his district, whose legal status he was instrumental in protecting in 2019.

Meanwhile, with TPS revoked, legal Venezuelan residents in the 26th Congressional District and elsewhere are dependent on Trump’s indulgence in extending them DED protection from deportation.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

The hill to die on: birthright citizenship

The hill to die on. (Art: AI)

Jan. 25, 2025 by David Silverberg

President Donald Trump, as expected, is “flooding the zone” with a blizzard of executive orders as he forces the federal government and nation to do his bidding.

Of his orders, his threat to end birthright citizenship is the most dangerous, in this author’s view, because it aims to change the United States Constitution.

Birthright citizenship is enshrined in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born on the soil or under the jurisdiction of the United States.

As opponents of the regime and lovers of democracy confront all the measures Trump is taking, protecting birthright citizenship is the issue calling for a firm, uncompromising stand and active opposition. It is, to use a political phrase, “the hill to die on.”

Anti-immigrant

Trump has been anti-immigrant from his very first speech in 2015 when he called Mexican migrants “criminals” and “rapists.” In rallies and in his first term he repeatedly compared migrants to snakes and called for “extreme, extreme vetting” to ensure that immigrants “have to be wonderful people that are going to love our country and work hard.”

When it came to birthright citizenship, “Well, we’re going to have to get it changed,” Trump told NBC’s Kristen Welker in an interview on Dec. 8, before taking office. “We’ll maybe have to go back to the people. But we have to end it. We’re the only country that has it, you know.”

Trump was completely wrong: 35 countries have unrestricted birthright citizenship.

Countries that have birthright citizenship, either unrestricted or restricted. (Map: World Population Review. The full interactive map can be accessed at the linked website.)

On his first day in office, Trump signed the executive order titled, Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.

It attempts to evade the 14th Amendment by arguing that people born to undocumented parents are ineligible for citizenship, whether they arrived without permission or overstayed visas. It orders officials not to issue or acknowledge documents recognizing US citizenship to their children.

The order was immediately blocked by Seattle, Wash., US District Judge John Coughenour.

“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case where the question presented was as clear as this one is,” he told a federal attorney defending the order.

“This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said, adding, “I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order.”

Coughenour’s order stands for 14 days and will then be reviewed to determine whether it will stand for longer.

The likelihood is that its constitutionality will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court.

In the House of Representatives, as soon as the executive order was issued, congressional Republicans rushed to codify it in legislation.

Rep. Brian Babin (R-2-Texas) and other Republicans announced on Thursday, Jan. 23, that they would be introducing legislation that would effectively repeal the 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment has been targeted since it was introduced and passed in 1868. Its intention then was to give citizenship to freed slaves. It’s been under attack ever since with repeal efforts introduced in consecutive congresses. In 2010 Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) called for its repeal, saying, “Birthright citizenship doesn’t make so much sense when you understand the world as it is.”

If the 14th Amendment is repealed, it will open the door to other alterations to the Constitution, designed to permanently change the United States government from a democracy to an outright dictatorship.

A President-for-Life?

Three days into the Trump regime, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-5-Tenn.) introduced House Joint Resolution (HJRes) 29 to amend the Constitution to allow Trump a third term. As of this writing it had no co-sponsors.

The resolution is tortuously written so that it allows Trump a third term but not former President Barack Obama.

A third term was also called for by Steve Bannon, an advisor in the first Trump administration, at a Republican gala on Dec. 15.

While Ogles’ resolution doesn’t explicitly repeal the 22nd Amendment limiting presidents to two terms, that is in fact what it does. Ironically, the 22nd Amendment is a Republican one, introduced by Republicans in 1947 and ratified in 1951. In a further irony—or perhaps deliberately—it mirrors actions taken by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Both extended their own countries’ presidential terms from four years to six and then lifted term limits.

It enabled both to effectively become presidents-for-life and that is essentially what this would do for Trump.

Stopping the stampede

This is the high tide of the Trump regime. He and his people have momentum, fervor and he clearly feels a sense of invincibility.

That said, constitutional checks and balances, no matter how battered and weakened, are still in place.

Once the Trump regime begins repealing amendments, it is likely to create a momentum to completely remake the Constitution to take away basic rights and institutionalize a dictatorship.

The goal of the Trump effort is to steamroller all opposition. In the past even the most partisan presidents and legislators attempted to handle opposition as legitimate as long as it was within the bounds of the law and they at least made a show of respect for honest opinions, even from opponents.

That is not the case with this president or his regime. They are pursuing absolutism.

The battle over birthright citizenship, presidential term limits and the Constitution is being fought by officials, legislators and jurists of the three branches of government.

However, activists, civic organizations and people at the grassroots who oppose these measures have a role to play. And when they face the spectrum of threats to their freedom, they should keep changes to the Constitution uppermost in their minds as they mobilize, organize and resist authoritarianism.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Day One Presidential executive orders and their impact on Southwest Florida

President Donald Trump signs an executive order yesterday following his taking the oath of office. (Photo: AP /Matt Rourke)

Jan. 21, 2025 by David Silverberg

The Donald Trump revolution has begun with 46 executive orders, issued immediately after his taking the oath of office, yesterday, Jan. 20.

They are sweeping, diverse in the areas they address and radical in their actions. There is also considerably redundancy, with different orders repeatedly directing the same actions.

In this analysis, ten orders appear to particularly affect Southwest Florida and its residents given their focus on immigration, border enforcement, energy exploitation as well as renaming the Gulf of Mexico.

The following is a list of the regionally relevant orders with brief analyses of their impacts. They are in the order they are listed on the official White House website, beginning with their official titles.

(A note on terminology: While this is not the usage in these orders, it is the usage of The Paradise Progressive that when it comes to immigration, an “immigrant” is someone who has legally been admitted into a country and all “immigrants” are ipso facto legal. A “migrant” is someone who has or is moving. (A useful mnemonic device is to remember that all immigrants are “in,” while all migrants are “moving.”) An “undocumented migrant” is someone who does not have the legal permissions to be resident in a country. An “alien” is any foreigner.)

Guaranteeing the states protection against invasion

This is a proclamation that declares an invasion on the southern border and closes the border by declaring that “entry into the United States of such [unauthorized] aliens be suspended until I issue a finding that the invasion at the southern border has ceased.”

While Florida does not share a land border with any country, it has been a destination for many migrants in the past. To the degree that this directive stops all in-migration to the United States, it will cut down the flow of migrants into Florida.

Restoring names that honor American greatness

This order re-names Mount Denali in Alaska to its previous designation, Mount McKinley, and changes the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

When it comes to the Gulf, it directs the Secretary of the Interior to alter the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) to expunge references to the Gulf of Mexico and “update the GNIS to reflect the renaming of the Gulf and remove all references to the Gulf of Mexico from the GNIS, consistent with applicable law.” All “agency maps, contracts, and other documents and communications shall reflect its renaming.”   

Protecting the American people against invasion

Like the order “protecting” the states, this order restricts immigration into the United States and declares that it is US policy to “faithfully execute the immigration laws against all inadmissible and removable aliens” and “to achieve the total and efficient enforcement of those laws… .” Like the other order, it will cut down on in-migration to Florida.

Temporary withdrawal of all areas on the outer continental shelf from offshore wind leasing and review of the federal government’s leasing and permitting practices for wind projects

This order directs the relevant officials not to permit wind energy leasing in the outer continental shelf. While Florida does not have any offshore wind farms, this order prohibits any in the future.

Declaring a national energy emergency

This is one of two “drill-baby-drill” orders. It declares that the United States is in an energy crisis and directs the relevant officials to “to facilitate the identification, leasing, siting, production, transportation, refining, and generation of domestic energy resources, including, but not limited to, on Federal lands.”

For Florida, this means that its shores will be open to oil exploration and exploitation.

Securing our borders

This order repeats the orders contained in others that seek to close the border, with the addition of building walls and barriers and other measures more relevant to the Southwestern land border, like stopping use of the “CBP One” mobile application for entry into the United States.

Protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship

This order attempts to nullify the Fourteenth Amendment granting birthright citizenship.

It orders officials not to issue or recognize documents recognizing US citizenship to people with parents who are not in the United States legally. It would appear to negate Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), while not mentioning that program specifically.

Realigning the United States refugee admissions program

This order cuts down on the number of refugees and asylum seekers admitted to the United States “to admit only those refugees who can fully and appropriately assimilate into the United States.”

Florida is home to numerous refugees and asylum-seekers from countries like Cuba, Venezuela and Haiti.

Unleashing American energy

This order repeats the earlier order allowing energy exploration and exploitation on federal lands, whether territorial or maritime, including the Outer Continental Shelf. There is no exception for Florida waters.

Delivering emergency price relief for American Families and defeating the cost-of-living crisis

This vaguely worded order directs officials to “deliver emergency price relief, consistent with applicable law, to the American people and increase the prosperity of the American worker.”

While directing the officials to cut down costs, eliminate unnecessary expenses, create jobs and “eliminate harmful, coercive ‘climate’ policies that increase the costs of food and fuel,” it provides no further specific actions.

Presumably, this will affect Southwest Floridians in the same way it affects all US citizens.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

On a personal note: Thanks and farewell, Joe!

Then-Sen. Joe Biden as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2004. (Photo: Foreign Policy)

Jan. 17, 2025 by David Silverberg

Watching President Joe Biden deliver his farewell address from the Oval Office last Wednesday, Jan. 15, I had the feeling that he wasn’t just saying goodbye to the presidency and the American people but that we the people were saying farewell to decency, democracy, patriotism and public service—all of which are embodied by Joe Biden.

As a reporter and editor in Washington, DC, I had the opportunity to cover Biden as a senator. He was always thoughtful, empathetic, and staunch in his belief in America as a place of freedom and opportunity.

And loquacious. My God, he could talk. And talk. And talk.

I used to cover afternoon hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when he was chairman. All the witnesses had testified. All the other senators were done with their questions. I had to pick up my son on time in daycare in a Virginia suburb and if the hearing wrapped up at that moment, I’d have a good chance of getting there promptly and avoiding an extra charge.

I’d be primed to spring up and race off Capitol Hill.

Then Joe would start talking. He was chairman and there were no time limits. The reporters at the press table would groan. He’d begin exploring the topic of the hearing. He’d ponder the issues at hand. He’d speculate about the past and future. He’d offer observations and opinions.

It was interesting and insightful. And I’d be late to daycare and have to pay a fine.

But now all is forgiven. Americans are losing a thoughtful, empathetic, very smart president with decades of experience who was deeply committed to democracy and the “soul” of America.

One example of his decency and empathy was the fact that when he ran for president in 2020 he was the only candidate who used the word “heal” in his speeches.

In contrast to all the hostile campaign propaganda thrown at him, Biden was an extremely effective president. He guided the United States out of an incompetently handled COVID pandemic, righted the economy, restored American prestige and standing in the world, fully backed a besieged fellow democracy and held off an authoritarian thug, expanded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and made crucial investments in infrastructure and manufacturing. He protected the environment and advanced clean energy solutions. He understood the threat of climate change and worked to meet it. He would have enacted a comprehensive, bipartisan border solution except for the sabotage by the man who will succeed him and the subservience of Senate Republicans.

All of Biden’s good works and accomplishments are going to be under assault by Donald Trump and his regime in the days ahead. It will be like a mirror image of the real world, where they project their own crimes and shortcomings onto him. They will do all they can to diminish him and rewrite history to their liking, casting him as a villain. This will be done while objective facts are distorted by an avalanche of “alternative facts,” a phrase created during the first Trump presidency.

“Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation enabling the abuse of power,” Biden warned in his address. “The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact-checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.

“We must hold the social platforms accountable to protect our children, our families, and our very democracy from the abuse of power,” he said.

 Americans will need to approach their media with a much deeper sense of skepticism than they have in the past when they could rely on professional journalists to ferret out the truth. When it comes to the history of this era and particularly the Biden presidency, they need to reject the revisionism and falsehoods.

That revisionism is already well under way. For example, at one point Trump called the insurrection and attempted overthrow of the US government on Jan. 6, 2021 a “day of love.” There is a near-certainty that this kind of revisionism is going to infuse his inaugural address.

Americans who know the truth shouldn’t allow this rewriting to happen. Even if the truth can only reside in their memories, they should cherish it, record it, protect it and pass that truth on to their descendants.

Another truth is that Biden was one of the best and most effective presidents of the 21st century. The other was Barack Obama. Both are going to have their achievements and legacies attacked and defamed in the days ahead. But as Americans enjoy reasonable healthcare, buy medicines at affordable rates, obtain the necessities of life and still believe themselves to be a free people, they should remember the presidents who helped make it possible.  

Biden’s departure coincides with the passing and mourning period for Jimmy Carter, another deeply committed and patriotic American who set an example of humanitarianism and faith.

The era that is coming will be one of darkness and insanity, full of lies, distortions, selfishness, greed, groveling and corruption on a gargantuan scale.

Much of the coverage of Biden’s farewell address has focused on his warning of an emerging American oligarchy and its potential abuse of power.

“Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead,” he said.

This is certainly true.

“…In a democracy, there’s another danger to the concentration of power and wealth,” he continued. “It erodes a sense of unity and common purpose. It causes distrust and division. Participating in our democracy becomes exhausting and even disillusioning, and people don’t feel like they have a fair shot.”

But for all the threats and perils to America and democracy, Biden also issued a challenge to all Americans: “…we have to stay engaged in the process.”

He compared the future to the storms that can lash the Statue of Liberty, which he noted, is walking forward, trampling the chains of slavery and oppression.

“Yes, we sway back and forth to withstand the fury of the storm, to stand the test of time — a constant struggle—constant struggle, a short distance between peril and possibility.

“But what I believe is the America of our dreams is always closer than we think. And it’s up to us to make our dreams come true.”

Then, as he did in ending his presidential campaign, he passed on the torch.

“After 50 years of public service, I give you my word, I still believe in the idea for which this nation stands, a nation where the strengths of our institutions and the character of our people matter and must endure.

“Now it’s your turn to stand guard. May you all be the keeper of the flame. May you keep the faith.

“I love America. You love it too.”

Thanks, Joe. Well said.

And this time I don’t have to rush off to daycare.


Below is the full text of President Joe Biden’s farewell address as issued by the White House.

8:00 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: My fellow Americans, I am speaking to you tonight from the Oval Office.

Before I begin, let me speak to important news from earlier today. After eight months of nonstop negotiation, my administration — by my administration, a ceasefire and a hostage deal has been reached by Israel and Hamas, the elements of which I laid out in great detail in May of this year.

This plan was developed and negotiated by my team and will be largely implemented by the incoming administration. That’s why I told my team to keep the incoming administration fully informed, because that’s how it should be: working together as Americans.

This will be my final address to you from — the American people from the Oval Office, from this desk as president. And I’ve been thinking a lot about who we are and, maybe more importantly, who we should be.

Long ago, in New York Harbor, an ironworker installed beam after beam, day after day. He was joined by steelworkers, stone masons, engineers. They built not just a single structure but a beacon of freedom.

The very idea of America was so big, we felt the entire world needed to see — the Statue of Liberty, a gift from France after our Civil War. Like the very idea of America, it was built not by one person but by many people, from every background and from around the world.

Like America, the Statue of Liberty is not standing still.
Her foot literally steps forward atop a broken chain of human bondage. She’s on the march, and she literally moves. She was built to sway back and forth to withstand the fury of stormy weather, to stand the test of time, because storms are always coming. She sways a few inches, but she never falls into the current below — an engineering marvel.

The Statue of Liberty is also an enduring symbol of the soul of our nation, a soul shaped by forces that bring us together and by forces that pull us apart. And yet, through good times and tough times, we’ve withstood it all.

A nation of pioneers and explorers, of dreamers and doers, of ancestors native to this land, of ancestors who came by force, a nation of immigrants who came to build a better life,
a nation holding the torch of the most powerful idea ever in the history of the world that all of us — all of us are created equal. That all of us deserve to be treated with dignity, justice, and fairness. That democracy must defend and be defined and be imposed, moved in every way possible. Our rights, our freedoms, our dreams.

But we know the idea of America — our institution, our people, our values that uphold it — are constantly being tested. Ongoing debates about power and the exercise of power, about whether we lead by the example of our power or the power of our example, whether we show the courage to stand up to the abuse of power or we yield to it.

After 50 years at the center of all of this, I know that believing in the idea of America means respecting the institutions that govern a free society: the presidency, the Congress, the courts, a free and independent press. Institutions that are rooted not — they just — not to reflect the timeless words, but they re- — they — they echo the words of the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” Rooted in the timeless words of the Constitution, “We the People.”

Our system of separation of powers, checks and balances, it may not be perfect, but it’s maintained our democracy for nearly 250 years — longer than any other nation in history that’s ever tried such a bold experiment.

In the past four years, our democracy has held strong. And every day, I’ve kept my commitment to be president for all Americans through one of the toughest periods in our nation’s history.

I’ve had a great partner in Vice President Kamala Harris.

It’s been the honor of my life to see the resilience of essential workers getting us through a once-in-a-century pandemic, the heroism of service members and first responders keeping us safe, the determination of advocates standing up for our rights and our freedoms.

Instead of losing their jobs to an economic crisis that we inherited, millions of Americans now have the dignity of work; millions of entrepreneurs and companies creating new businesses and industries, hiring American workers, using American products.

And together, we’ve launched a new era of American possibilities — one of the greatest modernizations of infrastructure in our entire history, from new roads, bridges, clean water, affordable high-speed Internet for every American.

We invented the semiconductor — smaller than the tip of my little finger. And now it’s bringing those chip factories and those jobs back to America where they belong, creating thousands of jobs.

Finally giving Medicare the power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for millions of seniors.

And finally doing something to protect our children and our families by passing the most significant gun safety law in 30 years and bringing violent crime to a 50-year low.

Meeting our sacred obligation to over 1 million veterans so far who were exposed to toxic materials, and to their families — providing medical care and education benefits and more for their families.

You know, it will take time to feel the full impact of all we’ve done together. But the seeds are planted, and they’ll grow and they’ll bloom for decades to come.

At home, we’ve created nearly 17 million new jobs — more than any other single administration in a s- — single term.

More people have health care than ever before.

And overseas, we’ve strengthened NATO. Ukraine is still free. And we’ve pulled ahead of our competition with China. And so much more.

I’m so proud of how much we’ve accomplished together for the American people. And I wish the incoming administration success, because I want America to succeed.

That’s why I’ve upheld my duty to ensure a peaceful and orderly transition of power to ensure we lead by the power of our example. I have no doubt that America is in a position to continue to succeed.

That’s why, in my farewell address tonight, I want to warn the country of some things that give me great concern. And this is the dangerous concer- — and that’s the dangerous concentration of power in the hands of very few ultra-wealthy people, and the dangerous consequences if their abuse of power is left unchecked.

Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.

We see the consequences all across America. And we’ve seen it before, more than a century ago. But the American people stood up to the robber barons back then and busted the trusts.

They didn’t punish the wealthy. They just made the wealthy pay the by — play by the rules everybody else had to. Workers won rights to earn their fair share. You know, they were dealt into the deal, and it helped put us on the path to building the largest middle class and the most prosperous century any nation the world has ever seen, and we’ve got to do that again.

In the last four years, that is exactly what we’ve done.

People should be able to make as much as they can, but pay — play by the same rules, pay their fair share in taxes.

So much is at stake. Right now, the existential threat of climate change has never been clearer. Just look across the country, from California to North Carolina.

That’s why I signed the most significant climate and clean energy law ever — ever — in the history of the world, and the rest of the world is trying to model it now. It’s working, creating jobs and industries of the future.

You know, we’ve proven we don’t have to choose between protecting the environment and growing the economy. We’re doing both.

But powerful forces want to wield their unchecked influence to eliminate the steps we’ve taken to tackle the climate crisis to serve their own interest for power and profit.

We must not be bullied into sacrificing the future, the future of our children and our grandchildren. We must keep pushing forward and push faster. There is no time to waste.

It’s also clear that American leadership in technology is unparalleled — an unparalleled source of innovation that can transform lives. We see the same dangers of the concentration of technology, power, and wealth.

You know, his farewell address, President Eisenhower spoke of the dangers of the military-industrial complex. He warned us then about, and I quote, “the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power,” end of quote.

Six day lec- — six decades later, I’m equally concerned about the p- — potential rise of a tech-industrial complex that could pose real dangers for our country as well.

Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact-checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.

We must hold the social platforms accountable to protect our children, our families, and our very democracy from the abuse of power.

Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is the most consequential technology of our time — perhaps of all time. Nothing offers more profound possibilities and risks for our economy and our security, our society, our very — for humanity.

Artificial intelligence even has the potential to help us answer my call to end cancer as we know it. But unless safeguards are in place, AI could spawn new threats to our rights, our way of life, to our privacy, how we work, and how we protect our nation.

We must make sure AI is safe and trustworthy and good for all humankind.

In the age of AI, it’s more important than ever that the people must govern. And as the land of liberty, America — not China — must lead the world on the development of AI.

You know, in the years ahead, it will help to be — it’s going to be up to the president, the presidency, the Congress, the courts, the free press, and the American people to confront these powerful forces.

We must reform the tax code — not by giving the biggest tax cuts to billionaires, but by making them begin to pay their fair share.

We need to get dark money — that’s that hidden funding behind too many campaigns’ contributions — we need to get it out of our politics.

We need to enact an 18-year time limit — term limit — time and term — for the strongest ethics ref- — and the strongest ethics reforms for our Supreme Court.

We need to ban members of Congress from pra- — from trading stock while they’re in the Congress.

We need to amend the Constitution to make clear that no president — no president — is immune from crimes that he or she commits while in office. The president’s power is limit- — it’s not absolute, and it shouldn’t be.

And in a democracy, there’s another danger to the concentration of power and wealth. It erodes a sense of unity and common purpose. It causes distrust and division. Participating in our democracy becomes exhausting and even disillusioning, and people don’t feel like they have a fair shot.

But we have to stay engaged in the process. I know it’s frustrating.

A fair shot is what makes America, America. Everyone is entitled to a fair shot — not a guarantee, but just a fair shot, an even playing field — going as far as your hard work and talent can take you.

We can never lose that essential truth — remain who we are.

I’ve always believed and I’ve told other world leaders America can be defined by one word: possibilities.

Only in America do we believe anything possible, like a kid with a stutter from modest beginnings in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Claymont, Delaware, sitting behind the — this desk in the Oval Office as president of the United States.

That’s the magic of America. It’s all around us.

Upstairs in the residence of the White House, I’ve walked by a painting of the Statue of Liberty I don’t know how many times. In the painting, there are several workers climbing on the outstretched arm of the statue that holds the torch. It reminds me every day I pass it of the story and soul of our nation and the power of the American per- — people.

There’s a story of a veteran — this is — a veteran, a son of an immigrant, whose job it was to climb that torch and polish the amber panes so rays of light could reach out as far as possible. He was known as the “keeper of the flame.”

He once said of the Statue of Liberty, quote, “speaks a silent universal language, one of hope, that anyone who seeks and speaks freedom can understand.”

Yes, we sway back and forth to withstand the fury of the storm, to stand the test of time — a constant struggle — constant struggle, a short distance between peril and possibility.

But what I believe is the America of our dreams is always closer than we think. And it’s up to us to make our dreams come true.

Let me close by stating my gratitude to so many people. To the members of my administration, as well as public service and first responders across the country and around the world, thank you for stepping up to serve.

To our service members and your families, it’s been the highest honor of my life to lead you as commander in chief.

And, of course, to Kamala and her incredible partner — a historic vice president. She and Doug have become like family. And to me, family is everything.

My deepest appreciation to our amazing first lady, who is with me in the Oval today, for our entire family. You are the love of my life and lifes of my love.

And my eternal thanks to you, the American people. After 50 years of public service, I give you my word, I still believe in the idea for which this nation stands, a nation where the strengths of our institutions and the character of our people matter and must endure.

Now it’s your turn to stand guard. May you all be the keeper of the flame. May you keep the faith.

I love America. You love it too.

God bless you all. And may God protect our troops. Thank you for this great honor.

8:17 P.M. EST

The Statue of Liberty trampling the chains of oppression. (Photo: US Park Service)

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

SWFL-sponsored bills passed in 2024 will aid disaster victims

Victims of disasters like the California wildfires, with damage shown here, will receive tax breaks thanks to a bill introduced by Rep. Greg Steube and signed into law by President Joe Biden. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

Jan. 15, 2025 by David Silverberg

In an unprecedented feat for Southwest Florida members of Congress, two representatives succeeded in getting laws passed in the last session, a remarkable achievement.

Both pieces of legislation were propelled by the devastation of Hurricane Ian in 2022 and will benefit disaster victims in the future.

Rep. Greg Steube (R-17-Fla.) introduced and then shepherded to passage his Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2023 (House Resolution (HR) 5683).

For the first time Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19-Fla.) moved a legislative proposal all the way to enactment with the FISHES Act (Fishery Improvement to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation) (HR 5103).

Both bills were passed by the House and Senate and were signed into law; HR 5683 on Dec. 12 and HR 5103 on Jan. 4.

Ironically, both bills were enacted by President Joe Biden, whom both Steube and Donalds repeatedly attacked, denigrated and insulted during the preceding two years.

The Tax Relief Act

Of the two laws, Steube’s has the wider national impact. In the most current disaster situation, it will help victims of the California wildfires.

The bill provides tax relief for victims of disasters. Taxpayers can exclude compensation they receive for disaster losses from their income taxes and specifically losses caused by wildfires. It also extends tax relief to the victims of the East Palestine, Ohio train wreck in 2023.

Steube introduced the bill in October 2023, almost exactly a year after Hurricane Ian. It went through the committee process but after being reported out by the Committee on Ways and Means, which oversees tax measures, it got stuck when Speaker of the House Rep. Mike Johnson (R-4-La.) didn’t advance it to the floor.

To overcome this roadblock, Steube relied on a rarely used procedure called a “discharge petition.” It provides that if a majority of members want legislation advanced it must go forward.

Steube and his staff began the laborious work of rounding up 218 member signatures, a notoriously difficult task in a fractious and partisan House of Representatives. However, the Democratic leadership chose to support it and by May, 189 Democrats and 29 Republicans signed the petition.

“I am grateful for the motivation and support of 217 of my bipartisan colleagues as we join forces to deliver tax relief for Americans all across the country,” Steube stated at the time. “That’s a testament to how important this issue is for ALL of our constituents.”

When the vote was taken on the floor the bill passed overwhelmingly, with a vote of 382 to 7. All seven nay votes were Republican. (Donalds didn’t vote on the measure.)

Following this the Senate took it up and passed it on a voice vote on Dec. 4.

It then went to President Biden, who signed it on Dec. 12.

The FISHES Act

In the 118th Congress Donalds was a prolific introducer of legislation; according to the official record of Congress, he introduced 61 bills, very few of which related to his district, which runs along the coast from Cape Coral to Marco Island.

Of all the bills, only four passed the House, one was voted down and the rest languished in committee, never advancing past their introduction.

However, the FISHES Act made it all the way through the House, Senate and onto the President’s desk.

Another product of Hurricane Ian, the bill is aimed at helping the fishing industry after disasters.

Under current law, after a disaster, funding to help fishing industry applicants has to be approved within 90 days. Once approved, it is up to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to sign off on a spending plan for disbursement within 90 days.

The bill speeds up the approval time to 10 days. If a grant applicant’s plan is incomplete, NOAA must tell the applicant what’s necessary to finish the application and then further tell the applicant when the plan is satisfactorily finished.

The plan can be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as long as its review doesn’t extend the timeline past 90 days.

The bill was backed by 49 cosponsors, 31 Republicans and 18 Democrats. It was also backed by 107 fishing-related organizations, associations and lobbying groups.

On Dec. 3 it passed the House by a voice vote. In the Senate it was approved by what is called “unanimous consent”—i.e., no one objected.

On Jan. 4, President Joe Biden signed it into law.

One question that will affect its implementation, though, is that Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation master plan for the Trump administration, advocates elimination of NOAA. If in fact NOAA is disestablished, the authority for issuing funds will be called into question as well as implementation of the FISHES Act.

Analysis: District needs and distractions

To date Southwest Florida members of Congress have had a poor legislative record, particularly given the needs of the region.

These successes are rare exceptions.

Both Steube and Donalds are intensely ideological congressmen, pledging total loyalty to Donald Trump and his agenda.

In the past, Steube has largely been notable for introducing firearms-related legislation; i.e., making guns faster and easier to get (and allowing their presence in the US Capitol, pre-Jan. 6, 2021). Donalds is a prolific bill introducer on a wide range of topics unrelated to his district (most notably nuclear power and premium cigars) who has shown next to no interest in follow-up and passage. He largely spent the past two years stumping for Trump around the country.

However, the prevalence of disasters and environmental challenges to the region requiring federal attention clearly forced both to propose practical measures transcending ideology.

Steube’s tax bill in particular is a nationwide measure that will bring considerable relief to victims of natural disasters and it is particularly timely in light of the California wildfires now burning.

It bears repeating that Steube’s success would have been impossible without the support of the entire Democratic caucus and leadership, who put his discharge petition over the goal line—and President Joe Biden, who signed the bill into law.

Donalds’ measure is much narrower in scope and far less impactful to the public at large, just making assistance approvals a bit quicker for fishing industry victims.

Following these successes, both congressmen immediately reverted back to ideological combat.

Steube had another legislative success yesterday, Jan. 14, when the full House passed his Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 (HR 28) by a largely party line vote of 218 to 206. The bill establishes that in athletics receiving federal funds, “sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth”—i.e., it prohibits transgender athletes.

Steube’s other bills in the current Congress include HR 320 to eliminate the “marriage penalty” in certain tax brackets, HR 244 to provide military healthcare to eligible veterans, and HR 321 to expedite airport gate passes for caregivers, guardians and parents boarding airplanes.

Donalds has not introduced any legislation yet this year. In the early days of his past two terms he introduced and then re-introduced the Harmful Algal Bloom Essential Forecasting Act and the Combat Harmful Algal Blooms Act, both of which are of direct relevance to his district. However, he never followed up on either of them.

This year so far, his attention appears focused on preparing a run for the Florida governorship in 2026. (More about this in a future posting.)

This year will be a tumultuous one, given the change of presidential administrations. Steube, Donalds and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-26-Fla.) will all no doubt be working legislatively and, certainly, rhetorically to advance the Trump agenda both in Southwest Florida and nationally.

The thing for Southwest Floridians to watch as the year unfolds is whether these men can keep any of their attention focused on the real needs of their districts and constituents—without the impact of another hurricane.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!