‘Alligator Alcatraz’ is just the start of a state plan to remove immigrants. Will it wreck Florida’s economy? 

This article was first published July 1 in The Florida Trident

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis envisions a state run immigration force, complete with its own police force and detention camps, that operates largely outside federal rules. (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

By David Silverberg

Mega-farmer Francis Alfred “Alfie” Oakes III addresses the camera as massive watermelons come rolling down a conveyor belt at one of his farms in Collier County. Behind him are workers, all of them Hispanic, rapidly picking up the melons and putting them in large bins.

“We’re loading as quickly as we can,” Oakes explains in a video he uploaded to Facebook on April 28. “We couldn’t do that without the help of this amazing team here.” 

He continues his praise of immigrant workers, whom he says are superior to the American labor force that used to work his family’s farms. 

Farmer and MAGA supporter Alfie Oakes extols the virtues of immigrant labor (Facebook/Alfie Oakes)

“They really do so much more of an amazing job than what we call the ‘domestic’ workers that we used to get 30 years ago when I started in this business,” Oakes says. “That’s why we can grow a 500 or 600-acre field and load 40 or 50 semi loads a day because these guys really know how to get it done. They’re true masters of their trade.”

It might be surprising to hear such pro-immigrant talk from Oakes, who is well-known as an ultra-conservative, pro-Donald Trump activist and local Republican kingpin. Trump, after all, has relentlessly attacked immigrants over the past decade, claiming they come from prisons and insane asylums, and has made deporting them en masse a cornerstone of his second term in the White House.  

In the video, Oakes, who owns the Seed to Table supermarket in Naples, seems to be telegraphing a plea to Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to leave his business alone in those deportation efforts. He says all the migrants who work for him are documented, but that hasn’t always been the case – in 2014, more than 100 of his employees were arrested for possessing false immigration papers. 

Clearly Trump heard the pleas of farmers like Oakes who rely on immigrant labor, as earlier this month he did an abrupt about-face on his mass deportation plans. 

“Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,” he wrote June 12 on social media. 

After so many years of relentless demonization, Trump was suddenly acknowledging that immigrants – including undocumented workers – have economic value in America. Shortly thereafter he announced the deportation effort would be aimed primarily at America’s cities, the “Democrat Power Center,” as he called it.  

Migrants work at one of Oakes’ farms. (Facebook/Alfie Oakes)

Trump’s admission only echoed what many economists and immigration experts have been saying all along: Migrant labor, rather than hindering the economy, is actually vital to it.

But there’s been no such concession by Gov. Ron DeSantis, and no sign his mission to make Florida the national leader in rounding up immigrants has lost any steam. “We’re leading,” DeSantis said during a May 12 press conference in Tampa. “I think others really need to do more.” 

Florida already has the country’s largest number of local agreements to assist federal deportation, according to ICE, and the governor has even bigger plans. At that same presser DeSantis unveiled his “Immigration Enforcement Operations Plan” detailing his administration’s vision of a new state-run immigration enforcement system to “circumvent federal agency bureaucracy” and essentially operate on its own rules. 

The 37-page plan paints a vision of immigrant holding camps where thousands of arrested immigrants would be detained in jails as well as tents and other makeshift facilities (“soft-side detention”) that it specifically notes may be built and run by for-profit prison companies. And it’s all part of the state’s effort to assist “President Trump’s fight against the ‘deep state’ within federal agencies,” according to the plan. 

And DeSantis, who didn’t respond to an interview request, has a pot of taxpayer money at his disposal for the effort. In February, he signed a bill into law allocating $298 million in state funds toward the effort, with the money going toward the hiring of 50 law enforcement officers and detention facilities, among other things.

Uthmeier, center, walks the “Alligator Alcatraz” site with state troopers in his X video. (X/Attorney General James Uthmeier)

A very dramatic early implementation of the plan is so-called “Alligator Alcatraz” — a detention camp of large tents and trailers in a little-used airport facility located in the environmentally protected Everglades of eastern Collier County expected to hold 3,000 immigrants. The prison is estimated to cost some $450 million annually to run, with funding expected from the Federal Emergency Management Administration. 

“There’s not much waiting for [immigrant detainees] but alligators and pythons,” said Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier in a June 19 X post. “There’s nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.”

The controversial project is moving at lightning speed. Its opening is expected today, with a visit to the site from Trump to mark the occasion, but a lawsuit filed against DeSantis by environmental groups on Friday aims to block its opening. “This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect,” said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, which filed the lawsuit along with the Center for Biological Diversity.

At the same time, the Trump Administration has systematically removed legal status for well over a million formerly documented immigrants – from countries including Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua – that will provide human fodder for camps like “Alligator Alcatraz.” 

Humanitarian and environmental concerns aside, multiple economic and immigration experts interviewed by the Florida Trident warn that mass sweeps, detentions, and deportations would do to the state’s economy precisely what Oakes fears it would do to his own massive farm operation. 

Bring it to ruin.

The need for immigrants

Michael Collins has spent his life in the hospitality industry, doing everything from making beds to running hotels for Hyatt and Wyndham. He’s also interim director of resort and hospitality management at Florida Gulf Coast University’s  Lutgert College of Business – and he told the Trident that a major sweep of immigrants in the state would be financially catastrophic.

“Bottom line, our business could not work at full capacity without foreign workers,” he said. “Next time you’re in a restaurant you might have a two hour wait to be seated, if not for them.”

The Department of Homeland Security, under Kristi Noem, promoted “Alligator Alcatraz” with this AI-generated image. (X/DHSgov)

Temporary workers in the hospitality industry are covered under H2B visas for non-agricultural workers, giving them permission to work up to three years in the United States. When it comes to Collier County as an example, Collins has a precise count: 661 H2B workers were admitted to the county for the first half of the federal fiscal year, which began in October. Of those, 85 percent were in the food preparation and serving business, while others worked in hotels, personal healthcare, and spas.

“That’s in one county,” Collins pointed out. “Double it up in Lee, Sarasota, and go to the east coast.” 

Florida’s iconic citrus industry provides another example of the state’s reliance on immigrant workers, according to Florida Immigrant Coalition spokesman Thomas Kennedy.

“Florida in the 1990s produced 240 million boxes of oranges each year,” said Kennedy, whose coalition represents 83 groups that advocate for immigrants. “This year it’s 12 million. There are issues of land use, a lot of growers leaving the industry, citrus greening disease, hurricanes, the occasional drought, the willingness to make some money by selling land to developers—that’s all happening. But it’s silly to pretend that there isn’t a labor issue. [The growers] talk about the impact of tariffs but they also talk about it being increasingly difficult to find workers that are economically viable for them.”

He noted Florida’s slowing population growth, with more young people moving out of the state and birth rates in decline. “Legal or not legal, any population boost will be from immigration,” Kennedy said. 

The response by state lawmakers to the need for more of these workers has been a flurry of proposals to drop restrictions on child labor and expand the hours that school-enrolled students can work part-time jobs. Even though these measures failed in the legislative session, Kennedy said they reflect the strains of an economy in need of workers.

The DeSantis Administration has “no feasible alternative if they went through with their mass deportation effort,” Kennedy said. “The thing they will never do is admit that they need more immigrants in the state.” 

Roka (FGCU/Center for Agribusiness)

When it comes to the broader agricultural sector, Social Security data shows the stereotypical perception that most of the workforce is undocumented is erroneous, according to Fritz Roka, director of FGCU’s Center for Agribusiness. Most migrant agricultural workers are authorized to come into the United States under the H2A visa program, which produced what Roka calls “a radical shift” in the number of documented workers versus undocumented workers after its launch in 1986 under President Ronald Reagan.

Oakes, the Collier County farmer, made the same point in his video.

“All the workers here are H2A workers that come over here on a work visa from Mexico over here for maybe five months,” he said.

Oakes is especially sensitive to this after 105 of his workers were arrested in a 2014 raid by Florida Division of Insurance Fraud. The workers were charged with multiple crimes, including fraudulent documentation, use of personal identification, identity theft and workers’ compensation fraud. 

While most of those charged were released on their own recognizance and given probation, he has said that ever since he’s been compliant with H2A and E-Verify, the federal database that tracks worker legal status. 

But in the Trump sweeps, holders of legitimate visas and green cards are not immune from arrest, said Fort Myers immigration attorney Indera DeMine. People are being detained when they report for what were once routine meetings with authorities, or at traffic stops, or for lapsed drivers’ licenses, she said, and then transferred from facility to facility so that family and counsel can’t contact them.

“What will we be left with?” 

Evidence of an aggressive targeting of workers in Florida is mounting. In Brevard County, ICE agents have raided construction and landscaping crews, according to Fox 35. In the Florida Keys, a roofing company owner (and Trump supporter) wept on camera during an NBC6-Miami interview after ICE took six of his workers, five of whom he said had valid work permits.

Attorney DeMine (DeMine Immigration Law Firm)

Like the Keys roofing company case, DeMine said she’s seen instances where documented immigrants are being targeted. 

“What we’re seeing is an out-of-control targeting of immigrants, not just the undocumented,” DeMine related. “We’re certainly seeing an uptick in removals and detentions. … If [her clients] didn’t have a criminal history they would be released on their own recognizance, or given probation. Now there’s less discretion.”

While documented workers aren’t being targeted en masse, the Trump Administration has moved the goalposts in its deportation effort by stripping documented status from more than one million immigrants who previously had legal status. The U.S. Supreme Court in May allowed the administration to move more than half a million immigrants here on humanitarian parole from Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua – many of them living in Florida – into the undocumented ranks, making them fair game to be swept up. Just this past Friday, the Trump Administration announced it was stripping temporary protective status for some 500,000 Haitian immigrants, setting them up for round-ups, detention, and deportation back to their home country rife with hunger, crime, and chaos. 

The Trump Administration just paved the way to round up a half million Haitians for deportation. (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

Combined with the federal effort, DeMine said she finds the prospect of the governor’s immigration enforcement plan – with its vision of mass roundups and camps run by a largely unregulated state force – nothing short of horrifying both in terms of constitutional rights and the state economy. 

“It threatens to strip people of their dignity, due process, and protections afforded under the U.S. Constitution,” she said. “It disregards international human rights standards and puts Florida at risk of becoming a state known for hostility and intolerance.

“What will we be left with? … Healthcare, agriculture, landscaping, hospitality and so many other businesses are so reliant on the immigrant workforce and no one in our government seems to be thinking of that.”

About the author: David Silverberg is a veteran reporter who covered Congress, defense, and homeland security during a 30-year journalism career in Washington D.C. As a freelance writer, his work has been published by Mother Jones, Gulfshore Business, and the Naples Press. 

On a personal note: An appreciation of Bill Mitsch, a wetlands warrior

Bill Mitsch in his natural habitat, 2021. (Photo: Bill Mitsch)

March 30, 2025 by David Silverberg

On Feb. 12 of this year, Prof. Bill Mitsch passed away at the age of 77.

William Jerome Mitsch was one of the world’s foremost scientific experts on wetlands like the Everglades and did much of his work in Southwest Florida at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU).

Although no one can stop the march of time and the toll it takes, Mitsch’s passing does leave a gap in the expertise and knowledge so critical to the environmental health of Southwest Florida. His knowledge of wetlands was awe-inspiring and encyclopedic.

Mitsch’s legacy of environmental activism is particularly relevant now as fights over control of wetlands and maintenance of their health flare anew under the regime of President Donald Trump.

The work Mitsch did and the causes he advocated should not be forgotten with his passing.

Mitsch first became interested in water and wetlands growing up in Wheeling, West Virginia, where he explored a nearby creek as a young boy.

“The creek, that must be where I started getting interested in aquatic science,” Mitsch, said at a 2022 presentation in Naples. “We knew everything about this creek, where the deep areas were, where the shallow areas were and how the creek meandered. We learned all this by chasing balls into the creek.”

A 1969 graduate of the University of Notre Dame, he was inspired by the first Earth Day celebrations in 1970 to pursue graduate environmental studies at the University of Florida. He pursued his doctorate under Howard Odum, a pioneering ecologist, at the university’s Center for Wetlands.

From there he pursued an active academic career studying, researching and analyzing wetlands. Among his many books, he was chief author of the standard textbook, Wetlands, now in its sixth edition. He held multiple faculty positions, sponsored over 85 master and doctoral students, published extensively and served on numerous boards.

Locally, Mitsch joined the faculty of FGCU in 2012 when he served as Eminent Scholar and Director of the Everglades Wetland Research Park, located in the Kapnick Center next to the Naples Botanical Garden. (The Park is now part of FGCU’s Water School.)

Mitsch was no ivory tower academic; he literally got his feet wet. And that didn’t just apply to swamps; it also meant the swamp of politics.

No sugarcoating

I first got to know Mitsch after moving full time to Naples in 2013. He was a source on several stories I worked on for Gulfshore Business magazine.

The word that springs to mind when I think of Bill Mitsch is “crusty.” He could be curmudgeonly, gruff and impatient. He was direct and brooked no bull. Even so, I always enjoyed talking to him. He was secure in his scientific expertise and fearless in speaking out about the truths it revealed.

Our first encounter came when I was researching an article for Gulfshore Business on water (“The Trouble with our Water”) in the January 2014 issue. (No longer available online.)

Mitsch provided background information for the article—but then he continued about the sugar industry’s interference in wetlands and water research to the point where I drafted a separate article to cover everything he provided.

In particular, he recalled an incident from 1992 when was distinguished professor and head of Ohio State University’s wetland research park. Along with Thomas Fontaine, then director of the Everglades Systems Research Division of the South Florida Water Management District, he was putting on the fourth international wetlands conference at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. It was sponsored by the International Association for Ecology. Only registered participants were supposed to be admitted.

Just before the conference began Mitsch was suddenly startled by Fontaine banging on the glass door to his office.

“They’re here!” Fontaine shouted when Mitsch got to the door. “They’re filming us and if you don’t get rid of them I’m taking my people and walking!”

“They” were people from the Florida sugar industry.

Mitsch rushed with Fontaine into the large, dark auditorium where the conference was going to be held and high up in the gloomiest murk of the highest seats he could see a tiny red light. He climbed the rows and sure enough, there were two men with a camera.

“I said, ‘I guess you guys are filming this event?’ and they didn’t argue,” Mitsch told me. They acknowledged that they worked for a company in Miami hired by sugar interests. “They were clearly there to hear every word that every state and federal official said.”

Mitsch had to get a legal opinion from the university before he could ask the cameramen to leave – and if they hadn’t departed he had the authority to have campus security throw them out. As it was, they did agree to depart but he also had to request that anyone in the audience turn in any recordings of the proceedings, which forced one poor graduate student to yield his tape recording.

That was hardly the only information he had to share. He plied me with allegations of Big Sugar interfering in research into the sources of pollution from Lake Okeechobee, to the point of industry agents breaking into laboratories to physically destroy notes and material. They blackballed scientists and targeted anti-pollution politicians. Regrettably, juicy as it all was, little of it was verifiable, so the article never appeared. But it was valuable in providing me with an understanding of the stakes and the extremism that water could inspire in this swampy realm.

Mitsch helped me formulate wetlands and Everglades policy positions when I worked as communications director for congressional candidate David Holden who ran in the 19th Congressional District in 2018.

That was also the year that Southwest Florida experienced the Big Bloom, a nasty, persistent red tide off the coast that was coupled with an intense blue-green algae outbreak in the Caloosahatchee River.

The Bloom continued for months, starting around October 2017 and persisted well past the 2018 election. Its cause seemed mysterious and unlike previous blooms, it showed no sign of dissipating.

On Jan. 10, 2019, Mitsch delivered a lecture at FGCU at which he pinpointed what he believed to be the causes, based on his research.

Bill Mitsch pinpoints the causes of 2018’s Big Bloom in a lecture to an audience at FGCU. (Photos: Author)

The cause, he said, was nitrate fertilizer—after years of debate and finger-pointing, it was the first time the source had been so authoritatively identified.

He also said that nitrate-laden rainfall, much of it caused by cars using I-75, leaking septic tanks, and pollution flowing from the Mississippi River drifting across the Gulf of Mexico, fed the naturally-occurring Karenia brevis organisms.

At least in part due to Mitsch’s findings, the state, some counties and towns enacted rules regulating fertilizer use in an effort to cut down the pollution and combat the red tide. To this day Lee and Charlotte counties in Southwest Florida ban fertilizing from June 1 to Sept. 30. In Collier County the cities of Naples and Marco Island do as well.

The birth of ‘wetlaculture’

Mitsch didn’t just chronicle and analyze problems, he also proposed fixes.

At the same lecture where he focused on nitrates as the cause of the Big Bloom, Mitsch argued for a solution to the pollution plaguing the Everglades and all the water that slowly flows south from Lake Okeechobee.

He called it “wetlaculture.”

The concept was that pollution could be defeated by creating new wetlands, which would filter out contaminants. These new wetlands could be created on previously cultivated land. Furthermore, they would create soil so fertile that nitrate fertilizers would not be necessary.

“Wetland restoration and creation are not easy,” Mitsch warned in his lecture. “They require attention to Mother Nature (self-design) and Father Time (projects take time to reach their potential).”

Further, he argued, wetlaculture had to be implemented on a massive scale. He estimated it would take 100,000 acres of wetlaculture to ensure clean water to the Everglades, 14 times more than that provided in Everglades restoration reservoir plans—of which he was very skeptical.

“They’re not digging a hole at all,” Mitsch said of the reservoir in a 2022 Naples Daily News interview. “They’re just putting up a gigantic wall around this rectangle and fill it with 34 feet of water. Nature doesn’t use squares and rectangles. They’re hoping the water will be clean enough but there are not enough [stormwater treatment areas] to put a dent in the nutrients.” 

However, his preferred solution required time—10 years for new wetlands to establish themselves, in Mitsch’s estimation. For 10 years the soil would be used for agriculture. At the end of that time, the soil would be flipped and left fallow for 10 years to serve as a wild, cleansing wetland. Then, it could be flipped again, and so on, indefinitely.

It would also take a lot of money—much more than state government could provide, in Mitsch’s view. That meant it would take a federal commitment.

“We need the feds to keep an eye on our state government,” he said.

A wetlaculture experiment was actually implemented in May 2018 and it can be seen to this day. It’s in a fenced area at the back of Freedom Park in Naples that anyone can visit.

It actually doesn’t look like much. There are 28 kidney-shaped bins in the ground with sawgrass growing out of them. All of them will sit while the sawgrass grows. Researchers experiment with different levels of water and nutrients in the different bins. They measure nutrients in the soil and see if nitrates and phosphorous are being removed. When the soil is deemed to be clean and fertile enough they’ll plant crops and see how well they grow.

It wasn’t clear when the experiment started whether the cleansing process would take just a few years or 10 years, as Mitsch estimated.

But whatever it ultimately takes, in those quiet, stationary bins, Mitsch may just have launched a wetlands revolution.

The wetlaculture experiment in Freedom Park in Naples, Fla., in 2019. (Photos: Author)

A dark day

On the night of Jan. 24, 2020, I happened to be surfing the Internet and went into LinkedIn, which I rarely checked. By pure coincidence I discovered a blistering, infuriated screed from Mitsch, that had been posted minutes earlier.

The day before, Jan. 23, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Donald Trump had rolled back federal protections for wetlands and American waters and Mitsch was outraged.

Trump had boasted: “I terminated one of the most ridiculous regulations of all: the last administration’s disastrous Waters of the United States rule.”

“This is the darkest day for Federal protection of wetlands since it first started 45 years ago. This is a horrible setback for wetland protection in the USA, ” Mitsch wrote.

“I have followed this tug of war for all these years between those who appreciate the many ecosystem services that wetlands provide including cleaning our waters, sequestering and permanently storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and providing the best habitat for hundreds of threatened and endangered species, and the industrial-scale agricultural, energy, and real estate giants.”

He followed with a call to action: “It has always been a David vs. Goliath. I am calling for those of us who appreciate some of the good things that nature has provided for us, whether you are Republican, Democrat, or Independent, to speak out about the rape of our landscape that will surely follow this action. I especially call upon those who are in the business world to help establish environmental bonds, local and state ordinances, and novel approaches to save our remaining wetlands. I also call upon the children and young adults, who are much more knowledgeable about wetlands than their parents and grandparents, to join the ‘silent majority’ who appreciate the role of wetlands to move forward, with or without our Federal government, to save our planet.”

Knowing that this was unlikely to be covered by any other media outlet in Southwest Florida, I wrote up the story for The Paradise Progressive: “FGCU wetlands professor blasts Trump water rules, calls for citizen action.”

The David versus Goliath struggle would continue for the next four years, with battles in courts and appropriations committees.

It reached its next inflection point on June 9, 2021 when the EPA under President Joe Biden reversed Trump’s wetlands decision.

Mitsch was ecstatic: “It’s a good move,” he told me when I called him. “I’m happy because it’s the right direction.”

The EPA’s announcement was made in coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers.

“I’m delighted both agencies have stepped forward,” said Mitsch. “This, in my view, is a good turn for Southwest Florida and especially the Everglades.”

Still, Mitsch had reason to be cautious. “This is déjà vu all over again for me,” he said. “It’s the same issue that keeps coming back. It’s quite contentious.”

The core of the dispute was the definition of “waters” and “wetlands,” which had twice been defined in different ways.

“I hope they don’t get on a third definition that’s political and not scientific. I hope they have the stamina to go through with it,” he said of current efforts. “There is no such thing as a [legitimate] political definition of a ‘wetland’—otherwise we might as well throw out all our scientific books.”

Mitsch opposed the State of Florida’s efforts to take over wetland permitting and environmental protection. That authority was transferred to the state in December 2020 in one of the last official acts of the first Trump administration.

Mitsch’s hope was that the environmentally-aware Biden administration would keep control of permitting.

“I’m very much afraid of Florida taking wetland management away from the feds. What the feds are doing is great but I’ve seen it before,” he said.  “There’s no question why [the state] wanted to take over water regulation; it was for development.” While he said he was discouraged that “the train is out of the station in Florida, I hope the momentum of this [new federal rule] spills into Florida somehow.”

As Mitsch predicted, the battle continues.

On the one hand the federal government won a round on Tuesday, March 25, when the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the US Army Corps of Engineers and against the sugar companies. While the sugar growers sought a larger water allocation than the Corps was providing and sued to get it, the court sided with the Corps, keeping the water flowing for Everglades restoration.

Mitsch would have approved.

However, with Trump back in office, Florida is again trying to seize control of the state’s wetlands.

In 2024 a US District judge vacated the 2020 Trump decision to hand permitting authority to the state, ruling that the transfer violated the Endangered Species Act. The ruling came in response to a 2021 lawsuit filed by Earthjustice, an environmental organization. That lawsuit argued that the state of Florida was still trying to evade the Endangered Species Act restrictions. The lawsuit aimed to force compliance.

The latest twist in the saga will come on May 5. That’s when arguments over permitting authority between Florida and the EPA will be heard in the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Regrettably—or perhaps mercifully—Bill Mitsch will not be present for the latest developments.

Mitsch retired in 2022 after a 47-year career, but he remained alert and interested in his field to the end.

In Southwest Florida, a land so critically dependent on its wetlands, which are extremely endangered and likely to be even more assaulted, it’s worth remembering Mitsch’s work and the enormity of his scholarship and innovations.

But especially at this time it’s particularly important to never forget his activism and his fearlessness in conducting good science, speaking the truth and acting on it. He did that despite controversy and opposition and big forces arrayed against him.

It set a good example and one that has never been more important than now.

He was truly a wetlands warrior.

To read all of The Paradise Progressive’s coverage of Bill Mitsch, click here.

Liberty lives in light

© 2025 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Polling and surveying could put FGCU on the national map—and benefit Southwest Florida

Public opinion research has impact on the region

Volunteers canvas a Naples, Fla., neighborhood during a 2018 campaign. (Photo: Author’s collection.)

June 20, 2023 by David Silverberg

Southwest Floridians could be forgiven if they don’t pay attention to polls. After all, there’s an avalanche of polling going on right now.

Every day political news junkies can see a spectrum of headlines: Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) or former President Donald Trump up or down in polls measuring sentiment in different states; good news or bad news for presidential candidates in increasingly exotic and narrow slices of Republican potential primary voters; approval and disapproval ratings for President Joe Biden and Democrats versus Republicans, are just a few.

Most times, national pollsters don’t bother with Southwest Florida. It’s too obscure and unpopulated to make a decisive difference in any election or have an impact as a market (as compared, say, to Miami).

But popular sentiment in Southwest Florida is important and deserves to be measured regularly, scientifically, apolitically and objectively. Right now there are no reliable, public sources of information about Southwest Florida public opinion. What is more, regional public sentiment will become more important as the area’s population grows.

Southwest Florida should have a better finger on the pulse of the region’s people. Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) could provide an academic, non-political center for such polling and surveying that would be an asset to the region and potentially to the nation. What is more, it could provide a source of income to the school, boost its national reputation and train students for future jobs.

Two examples explain why public opinion research is important in Southwest Florida and the impact it can have.

On the Table and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida

(Terminology note: This article distinguishes between “polls” and “surveys.” A “poll” or “polling” examines choices, whether between candidates or anything else, for example, between different products. A “survey” or “surveying” gathers information to determine attitudes and opinions. Both use representative samples to extrapolate conclusions and probabilities about larger populations.)

Two surveys conducted in Southwest Florida have provided significant insights into the region’s public thinking.

On the Table

One survey was just released yesterday, June 19, by the group On the Table for Southwest Florida. It sought opinions on the area’s most urgent social challenges.

Started in 2014 by the Chicago Community Trust, On the Table is a non-profit organization that attempts to bring communities together to discuss issues of common interest and concern. It claims to have involved over half a million residents in over 25 communities across the country.

In Southwest Florida’s case, the Charlotte Community Foundation, the Collier Community Foundation and the Collaboratory, a community problem-solving network based in Fort Myers, collaborated to hold a community forum on March 30. The forum consisted of networked but physically remote conversations by participants across the region, including people in Glades and Hendry counties. According to On the Table, over 4,000 people participated.

Of those participants, 811 completed a survey on the area’s social problems. FGCU participated in processing the results.

By 70 percent across all counties, the participants ranked the need for affordable housing and the problem of homelessness as the area’s most urgent need.

That was followed by mental health and substance abuse issues at 61 percent, healthcare access and cost at 52 percent, employment and economic development at 49 percent and kindergarten through high school education also at 49 percent. Other issues mentioned included hunger and food insecurity, transportation and traffic, crime and violence, social justice and equality, environmental issues, services for the disabled and senior citizen issues.

Regional social issues listed by On the Table participants, grouped by county and priority.

These results are not statistically authoritative; there are many arguments that could be made about the sample and the methodology and On the Table acknowledged this. “Respondents constitute a non-random sample, as such conclusions cannot be scientifically generalized beyond the collected survey,” it stated in its final report.

However, it added: “Yet, even with that caveat, data provided powerful insights into the most important social issues facing the region.”

That is absolutely true. The On the Table survey was significant in providing insight into people’s concerns about the challenges to the region. In the absence of any authoritative, dedicated think-tank comprehensively analyzing the region’s needs, this was a good start. The results can be used by lawmakers and government officials in shaping solutions and proposals and setting priorities.

It was a significant surveying initiative in a region that has too little such insight as it moves forward.

The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

On Feb. 20, 2019, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, an environmental advocacy organization, released The Southwest Florida Climate Metrics Survey.

It was a survey of 800 adults over 18 years of age that had been done the previous October. It covered 401 respondents in the Fort Myers area, with proportions in Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry and Lee counties.

This survey was significant in revealing that Southwest Floridians understood and believed that climate change was real and was happening—in contrast to their public officials and politicians who until then denied it as an article of faith.

According to the respondents in that survey:

  • 76 percent noticed more severe weather and changing seasonal weather patterns over previous years;
  • 75 percent believed climate change was happening;
  • 71 percent were concerned about climate change;
  • 59 percent believed the effects of climate change were already happening.

The survey found that public attitudes changed after 2017’s Hurricane Irma, which Rob Moher, president and CEO of the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, characterized as “a wake-up call for Southwest Florida.”

It also revealed that residents supported government action to deal with climate change, with 93 percent calling for more government protection of mangroves and wetlands and 67 percent saying the government needed to protect everyone from the impacts of extreme weather.

It cannot be overstated just what a revelation these results were at the time. They helped change attitudes throughout the region. On Sept. 11 of that year, then-Rep. Francis Rooney, the Republican representing the 19th Congressional District, published an article in Politico magazine: “I’m a conservative Republican. Climate change is real. It’s time to stop denying a crisis that our constituents are already seeing every day.

The Conservancy survey was a solid example of how the revelation of citizen attitudes can inform official actions and positions.

It would be very interesting to see the results of a follow-up survey on attitudes in the wake of Hurricane Ian.

A modest proposal: A public opinion research center at FGCU

Given the importance of public attitudes on regional issues, public surveys shouldn’t be as infrequent and sporadic as they are in Southwest Florida.

The region has an institution in FGCU that could serve as an impartial, politically neutral center for public polling.

In this, it can look to the example of Monmouth University in Long Branch, NJ. A liberal arts institution founded in 1933, in 2005 it created its own Polling Institute and recruited Patrick Murray, a professional New Jersey pollster, as its founding director.

“At small schools, the idea is to use the poll as a loss leader for visibility for the institution,” Cliff Zukin, a Rutgers University professor who taught Murray, said in a 2018 New Jersey Monthly magazine interview. The idea, according to Zukin, is to hire good pollsters, then watch them and their numbers flash across screens, emblazoned with the institution’s name. Quinnipiac, Siena, Marist, Fairleigh Dickinson—all are schools that followed this playbook.

Today, Monmouth University is not only highly respected for its polling, which is considered some of the best in the country, it monitors public opinion, works with faculty and students on public opinion research and provides input into government decisionmaking. What’s more, it trains students for jobs in public survey research.

There is no reason that FGCU could not also follow this playbook. Not only would it raise the school’s profile, it would provide regular insight into Southwest Florida public opinion. With time and as its reputation grows, it could expand its reach throughout Florida and the Southeastern United States and then nationally. It could take on commercial, non-political polling and surveying, creating a revenue stream for the University. It could partner with other established academic polling centers like Monmouth University. And it would do this while training students for jobs in public opinion research, which is a field in much demand.

Whether FGCU decides to go this route or not, there is a real need for insight into public opinion in Southwest Florida. The two major surveys done to date have shown how this kind of research can have a real impact. For a growing region, knowing how people are thinking and feeling would provide a useful tool and be an asset both for FGCU and for all of Southwest Florida.

Liberty lives in light

© 2023 by David Silverberg

Help defend democracy in Southwest Florida—donate here!

Closed Rooney Roundtable proceeds despite protests from public and press

439 days (1 year, 2 months, 15 days) since Rep. Francis Rooney has met constituents in an open, public forum

May 7, 2019 by David Silverberg

Updated with WGCU/Twitter reporting, May 8, 2019

Despite anguished protests from Floridians affected by impure or polluted water and outraged demands for public and press access, federal, state and local officials held a secret, closed meeting today at Florida Gulf Coast University’s Emergent Technologies Institute to discuss harmful algal blooms.

The roundtable was attended by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) as well as a variety of officials from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. State officials from a variety of agencies attended as well as officials at the county and municipal levels.

Although DeSantis and Rep. Francis Rooney (R-19-Fla.) held a press conference after the very brief meeting, the public was kept at a sufficient distance from the lectern and speakers so that they couldn’t be heard. No transcript is expected.

A second, public, streamed event on the topic of harmful algal blooms is scheduled to be held Friday, which will be more of a public airing and include local activist organizations.  However, the press and public will likely never know what decisions were reached at the closed roundtable held today.

Some live clips from the meeting courtesy of WGCU via Twitter:

On the impropriety of closing the meeting: https://twitter.com/wgcu/status/1125802351992897537

On the threat to democracy from improper secrecy: https://twitter.com/wgcu/status/1126156718780637184

05-07-19 Panorama of FGCU-ETI, site of Rooney RoundtableA panoramic view of the site where the Rooney Roundtable was held. The orange cones mark the closest distance that the public was allowed to get to the building.    (All photos by the author.)
05-07-19 Protesters at Rooney roundtableA small but vigorous group of people tried to make their concerns about Southwest Florida water quality heard but were ignored by the officials at the Roundtable. A number were protesting the mining activities of the Mosaic Co., which they say is polluting waters in central Florida.
05-07-19 Protester with taped mouth at Rooney roundtableA protester demands clean water and the chance to speak to government officials and lawmakers.
05-07-19 Darlene Lucas and Jan Fennessy, protesters at Rooney RoundtableDarlene Lucas, a retired nurse, and Jan Fennessy drove to Fort Myers from Venice to try to learn about the health effects of algal blooms. Lucas said she had seen severe impacts from impure water in her practice.
05-07-19 Eric Larson, student at FGCU-ETIEric Larson, a student at the Emergent Technologies Institute. Larson had hoped to show Gov. DeSantis the facility and some of his work but wasn’t permitted in the building and was kept outside on the lawn with other members of the public.
05-07-19 DeSantis press conferenceThe closest the public was allowed to get to the outdoor press conference by DeSantis and Rooney.

The secrecy of the Rooney Roundtable was a violation of the spirit and intent of Florida’s Sunshine Law, which holds that decisions affecting the public should be made in public, WINK-TV lawyer Karen Kammer stated in a May 3 letter to Rooney.

Commentary

Rooney and DeSantis’ ability to exclude the press and public from a forum making decisions critical to Floridians’ health and wellbeing sets a dangerous precedent and is a blow to the rule of law in a state with one of the most comprehensive government transparency laws in the nation.

The secret decisions taken at this meeting will now likely trickle down to the county and municipal levels but in what forms and to what ends the press and public may never know.

Liberty lives in light

© 2019 by David Silverberg

Activists show up early at Rooney Roundtable

05-07-19 Tim Ritchie and activists at FGCU ETI

Tim Ritchie (left) and fellow activists Samuel Tarpening and Frank Coz, show up early at Florida Gulf Coast University’s Emergent Technologies Institute to press their case for clean water after a drive from Punta Gorda. Ritchie is founder and organizer of March Against Mosaic, which seeks to ban phosphate mining in Florida. The trio was on hand for the opening of a “private” roundtable organized by Rep. Francis Rooney (R-19-Fla.) to show their concern to officials discussing harmful algal blooms. Rooney closed the meeting to press and public in possible violation of Florida’s Sunshine Law. Nonetheless, public activists will seek to make their voices heard throughout the day.   (Photo: David Silverberg)

WINK-TV lawyer to Rooney: Closed roundtable violates Sunshine Law

04-30-19 Emergent Technologies Institute

Florida Gulf Coast University’s Emergent Technologies Institute where a closed discussion on harmful algae blooms is scheduled to take place on May 7.  (Photo: FGCU)

437 days (1 year, 2 months, 13 days) since Rep. Francis Rooney has met constituents in an open, public forum

May 5, 2019 by David Silverberg

The Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) roundtable scheduled for Tuesday, May 7, will violate Florida’s Sunshine Law if it is closed to the press and public, argues an attorney for WINK-TV, based in Fort Myers, Fla.

“However well-intentioned the notion of closing the HAB Meeting to the press and public may have been, such closure in our view violates Florida’s Sunshine Law,” writes Karen Kammer, a lawyer with the firm Mitrani, Raynor, Adamsky and Toland, Miami, Fla., and counsel to WINK-TV.

Kammer delivered the opinion in a strongly-worded May 3 letter to Rep. Francis Rooney (R-19-Fla.), who organized the meeting (referred to here as the Rooney Roundtable). After publicly announcing the meeting of federal, state and local officials in April, Rooney subsequently declared that the meeting was “private” and press and public would be excluded.

“Respectfully, on behalf of my clients and the public we must object strenuously to closure as a violation of Florida’s Sunshine Law, Section 286.011, Florida Statutes,” argued Kammer.

Kammer noted that the Sunshine Law only allows very narrow exceptions to opening meetings to the public and these exceptions must be made by the legislature, not individuals.

Kammer cited five objections to Rooney’s closure of his roundtable:

  1. He has no legal standing to close a meeting of state and local officials;
  2. The reasons he cited for closure (privacy, personal relationships and unrestricted discussion) don’t exist in Florida law;
  3. Action and decisions based on the roundtable may be taken by public boards and commissions and so it must be open to press and public;
  4. It appears that invitees were chosen specifically to evade the Sunshine Law’s requirements;
  5. Any concerns that Rooney might have about decorum or order during the course of the meeting is not a basis for closure.

“The devastating effect of the algal blooms on the health and welfare of Florida’s citizens, as well as on the state’s economy, is worthy of continued discussion to devise efforts to combat it. Nonetheless, such efforts must be conducted in the sunshine as Florida law requires,” wrote Kammer. “Accordingly, we urge each of you to honor our objections and insist the Meeting be made open to the press and public in the manner described above.”

There is no response to the letter or any other comment on the Roundtable on Rep. Rooney’s website. A query has been sent to Rooney’s office.

This report will be updated as circumstances warrant.

Liberty lives in light
© 2019 by David Silverberg

“You’re not invited”—How the Rooney Roundtable went from success to mess, an analysis

04-30-19 Emergent Technologies Institute

Florida Gulf Coast University’s Emergent Technologies Institute where a closed discussion on harmful algae blooms is scheduled to take place on May 7.  (Photo: FGCU)

436 days (1 year, 2 months, 12 days) since Rep. Francis Rooney has met constituents in an open, public forum

May 4, 2019 by David Silverberg

It takes special effort to transform an impending success to an ongoing mess.

At the end of April, by all conventional measures, the roundtable discussion of harmful algal blooms organized by Rep. Francis Rooney (R-19-Fla.) was looking to be a great success.

He had pulled together all the key players, federal, state and local, who could actually do something about Southwest Florida’s water crisis. They were going to meet each other in the flesh and have a substantive discussion and perhaps reach some decisions. He had commitments that they would show up—no small feat! He had arranged a time and a venue in Southwest Florida. He was burnishing his credentials as a green Republican who cared about his local environment and getting kudos for it. He had the local media playing it up, simply accepting his press release.

But when that media started scheduling their actual coverage of the event, they discovered something startling: they weren’t invited. Neither was the public. For all the promotion, all the preliminary publicity they’d given this event, they were excluded.

Not only that but all the participants were public officials on the public payroll and they were going to conduct public business on vital matters. In a state with perhaps the most sweeping sunshine law in the country, Rooney had simply decided to lock the doors and keep the press and public out—and it seemed that his attendees, all public servants and many in publicly elected offices, were in on the game.

Now coverage of what we’ll call the Rooney Roundtable is a matter of intense public interest and an important point of contention—because if Rooney gets away with closing this matter of vital public importance, it means that the Florida Sunshine Law is a sham and doors will start slamming on the press and public in Southwest Florida and throughout the state in the future. When matters of vital public importance are discussed, no longer will the public know what’s being decided or done in their name or to them. The media, their eyes and ears, will be unconstitutionally blinded and muted.

This comes at a time of heightened awareness of government secretiveness at the national level over topics like the Robert Mueller report, the president’s tax returns and Russian election meddling. Rooney’s promise to hold a press conference after his roundtable smacks suspiciously of what will likely be a local replay of Attorney General William Barr’s deceptive summaries of Mueller’s findings. Rooney may summarize what was said at the roundtable but the public, who pays every attendee’s salary, will not know who said what or which agency each speaker represented. Overall, Rooney is appearing to be cut from the same secretive cloth as his hero and mentor, Donald Trump.

From a political perspective, Rooney’s insistence on secrecy has turned his roundtable from a triumph to a debacle. He now seems to be doing something illicit to the public rather than on their behalf. He has turned what was previously a largely supportive, supine and somnolent local media establishment against himself and the bitterness from this is likely to linger. Whether it will still be remembered next November is questionable. But if Rooney faces a primary challenge, which is likely, it will add fuel to his adversary’s fire.

Rookie mistakes

The most revealing thing about Rooney’s thinking was a statement he made that was quoted by NBC-2’s Dave Elias: “to obtain the participants we have, the forum must be private and technically oriented.”

The statement reveals that Rooney has still not made the mental transition from private businessman to public servant, nor does he understand the nature of public business.

In inviting public officials to his roundtable, Rooney assured some potential attendees—probably all—that their comments would be off the record and shielded from public scrutiny.

First, he did not have the power or authority to do that. There are no “private” government meetings. They’re either open or closed, public or classified. In private life and business he could do whatever he wanted. But every listed participant in Rooney’s Roundtable is a public official doing the public’s business on the public payroll dealing with a matter of vital public interest. As a congressman and public servant, Rooney had no authority to move this off the record and out of public sight. If he was going to do it behind closed doors he needed to declare it a classified meeting and meet all the standards and requirements for classification, which would mean that all participants would be sworn to secrecy and revealing the roundtable’s contents would become a federal crime.

Secondly, Rooney has argued that the roundtable does not violate Florida’s Sunshine Law because no two participating officials are from the same agency. It’s a nice bit of Jesuitical hair-splitting but the intent of the Sunshine Law is to open proceedings affecting the public to public scrutiny and this meeting more than meets the standard. Further, if Rooney is wrong, his attendees from Florida jurisdictions could be guilty of a crime and face a fine. If they’re elected officials they will be giving potential opponents ammunition in their next elections.

As for the contents of the roundtable being too technical for the press and public to understand, that’s just plain arrogance. Every Southwest Floridian has been living with the consequences of harmful algal blooms for over a year. There’s excellent, deep and widespread understanding of the issue, the forces surrounding it and the government mechanisms for dealing with it. If Rooney is saying the press and public are too stupid to understand this topic then he’s also saying they’re too stupid to understand any public issue and ultimately, that they’re too stupid to vote. This is an argument that has no merit whatsoever.

Rooney is accustomed to being the head of a major corporation, to holding board and operational meetings where his word is law and his decisions are final. Like another inexperienced businessman thrust into a high-profile public role, he’s unaccustomed to constitutional and legal restraints on his actions and to meeting public requirements. He’s accustomed to being a ruler, not a servant so he finds the role of serving the public uncomfortable and unfamiliar.

With his roundtable, Rooney is trying to have it both ways. He wants publicity and public credit for organizing it but doesn’t want it to be publicly open and he wants a crisp, decisive meeting that reaches firm decisions without the kind of public sunshine required by law.

What is more, he’s not terribly reflective. As he said in his remarks at The Alamo gun range and store in May 2018, “we need a nation of do-ers, not philosophers.” Well, he didn’t philosophize much or think this through and what he’s doing is putting his foot into a quagmire very, very deeply.

The options

So what can Rooney do now? Options include:

  • The right and best option: Declare the meeting open. Tell his attendees that he made a mistake and that press and public will be in attendance and the meeting is on the record. Those who can’t handle it will simply drop out. Then release an official text of the proceedings.
  • Cancel the whole thing permanently.
  • Cancel this session but regroup and try to do the same thing again, only the right way, perhaps under the auspices of Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) or the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, with those institutions setting the groundrules and guidelines and handling invitations. Another alternative is to hold a formal field hearing or a hearing in Washington, DC, following the rules of the House of Representatives. And, of course, keeping everything open to the press and public.
  • Plow ahead as planned and just hold the roundtable as a “private” gathering excluding the press and public. But remember—this is like plowing a field sowed with landmines. You never know which one is going to blow up. Rooney may get his roundtable as originally conceived but he jeopardizes the wellbeing of his participants, whether civil service or elected. Moreover, this course may work to Rooney’s own detriment in unforeseeable ways.

The aim of the Rooney Roundtable is commendable but the process of putting it together as currently planned was ignorant and inept from both procedural and political standpoints. Its execution may actually be illegal.

So far as this author knows the roundtable is still scheduled for Tuesday, May 7 at the Emergent Technologies Institute of FGCU, 16301 Innovation Lane, in Fort Myers, Fla., which is just off Alico Road, east of Route 75. It’s a good guess that invitees will start showing up between 8:00 am and 9:00 am. Whether anyone else gets in will be up to Francis Rooney.

The press and public should be there. Let’s see if there’s still sunshine in the Sunshine State.

Liberty lives in light

© 2019 by David Silverberg

 

 

Pressure ramps up on Rooney to open government roundtable to press and public

04-30-19 Emergent Technologies InstituteFlorida Gulf Coast University’s Emergent Technologies Institute where a closed discussion on harmful algae blooms is scheduled to take place on May 7.  (Photo: FGCU)

435 days (1 year, 2 months, 11 days) since Rep. Francis Rooney has met constituents in an open, public forum

May 3, 2019 by David Silverberg

Pressure ramped up this week on Rep. Francis Rooney (R-19-Fla.) to open a scheduled roundtable on harmful algal blooms to the press and public.

The roundtable discussion on harmful algal blooms (HABs) is scheduled to take place Tuesday, May 7 at the Emergent Technologies Institute of Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) at 16301 Innovation Lane, in Fort Myers, Fla. It is closed to the press and public.

On April 30, NBC-2 News reporter Dave Elias filed a report on the meeting, in which he quoted Southwest Floridians complaining about being shut out. “There’s something that government officials don’t want us to hear, that’s what I get out of it,” said Emanuel Dimare, a Fort Myers realtor quoted by Elias.

On Wednesday, May 2, the Naples Daily News called for Rooney to open the discussion in an editorial, “Congressman Rooney should let public in on toxic algae discussion at FGCU,” written by Brent Batten for both that newspaper and the Fort Myers News-Press.

On Thursday, May 3, in an investigative report, “Officials schedule private meeting for SWFL water crisis,” WINK-TV reporter Lauren Sweeney attempted to contact all the announced attendees.

“Federal, state and local legislators are coming together in Southwest Florida to fight the water crisis, but you’re not invited,” Sweeney reported. She reported that WINK is considering legal action to open the meeting. (Sweeney’s report also contains a complete list of scheduled attendees.)

Also on Thursday the Naples Press Club, a non-profit, non-partisan organization of active and retired journalists and communications professionals, passed a resolution calling on Rooney to open the meeting. “…Organizers of this meeting should immediately open it to full, live coverage by the press and attendance by the public throughout its duration,” stated the resolution, adding “that no future meeting of this sort attended by public officials and of vital interest to the press and public should be closed to the press and public.”

Rooney press secretary Christopher Berardi had stated that a press conference would follow the meeting but has not yet announced a time.

Closing the meeting may violate Florida’s Sunshine Law (Florida Statute 286.011(1)), which states that any government meeting where decisions are made must be open to press and public in its entirety.

According to Sweeney of WINK-TV, in a statement Rooney maintained that since no two officials at the conference were from the same agency, the law did not apply. Elias of NBC-2 quoted a Rooney statement that declared “to obtain the participants we have, the forum must be private and technically oriented.”

The roundtable is intended to compare notes on the kinds of HABs that plagued Southwest Florida last summer. Officials will examine best practices and discuss preventive measures.

The attendees represent a cross section of federal, state and local officials.

Announced attendees include key federal officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Key state officials will come from the Florida departments of Environmental Protection, Economic Opportunity and Emergency Management. Local officials will come from Lee and Collier counties, the cities of Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach, Sanibel, Bonita Springs and the Village of Estero, as well as representatives of the Lee Health system and FGCU.

Liberty lives in light

© 2019 by David Silverberg